Think the army won't turn on it's citizens?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 01:38 PM by kattraxx
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to
post by kattraxx



Keep in mind both sides were uniformed soldiers. In effect, 2 countries fighting to become one under one set of rules.

Big difference between the civil war and soldiers shooting innocent men, women and children CAUSE SOMEONE SAID SO .


You don't think the civil war soldiers shot innocent men, women and children? Besides, I'm not talking justification here, for either side; not the point. Point is, with the right propoganda, you can get almost anyone to kill almost anyone.

Read up on Kent State. Uniformed soliders killing student protesters armed with rocks.

[edit on 12/26/08 by kattraxx]


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 02:10 PM by jstatz
reply to post by crmanager
[more i dont hate the military but im smart enough to know that a stranger is only gonna worry about his own family,not me.



reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 02:13 PM by jstatz
reply to post by jfj123



im not insulting the military,just stating a fact that history has proven over and over


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 03:07 PM by Muundoggie
reply to post by jfj123



OK they fired first. I stand corrected.
However, is it illegal to posses Firearms in the US. Are grenade casings illegal? I have seen them in Surplus stores and at Gun shows.
I'm not saying the Davidians were or were not going to use them but I think we still live under "innocent until proven guilty." Wait, it's the other way around now isn't it?
I am very certain that there are MANY groups that have modified their semi's.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 04:12 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by kattraxx
Originally posted by jfj123
reply to
post by kattraxx



Keep in mind both sides were uniformed soldiers. In effect, 2 countries fighting to become one under one set of rules.

Big difference between the civil war and soldiers shooting innocent men, women and children CAUSE SOMEONE SAID SO .


You don't think the civil war soldiers shot innocent men, women and children?

Again, not the point. The civil war was about 2 opposing, uniformed, identified enemies. Innocent people die all the time in war, UNFORTUNATELY, however, there is a huge difference between collateral damage and some instances of random brutality and ONLY RANDOM BRUTALITY against civilians.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 04:18 PM by jfj123
Originally posted by Muundoggie
reply to
post by jfj123



OK they fired first. I stand corrected.
However, is it illegal to posses Firearms in the US.

It is currently illegal to posses automatic weapons.

Are grenade casings illegal?

Not positive but as far as I am aware, YES.

I have seen them in Surplus stores and at Gun shows.

Those are dummies or inert, as opposed to prepped live grenade casings. Everything I've read states that dummy/inert/replica grenades are manufactured so the cannot be made live.

I'm not saying the Davidians were or were not going to use them

You don't build a grenade unless you're going to use it.

but I think we still live under "innocent until proven guilty." Wait, it's the other way around now isn't it?

No. The Davidians shot at ATF agents when they tried to serve them. They had enough proof for a judge to issue a warrant. This was not a blind raid.

I am very certain that there are MANY groups that have modified their semi's.

Yes, I'm sure there are. It's a federal offense to do so.



reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 04:37 PM by jstatz
reply to post by dooper



they say the jews in germany thought that way to,look what happened


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 05:22 PM by dooper
reply to post by jfj123


Not true. You can buy all you want, and I don't care when they were manufactured. You want a Browning .50 belt fed machine gun? You got the money, they got the guns.

I'm talking federal. States may vary, but we've been allowed to purchase full auto weapons all along. Legally.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 05:51 PM by Vector J
This is an extremly interesting thread, and I take the OP's point fully.

What I find intruiging is the people saying 'Soldiers won't fight against their own people, because of their morals/personal judgement/whatever.'. These are the same people that agree that solideris are trained to follow orders.

Anyone notice the problem?

If we believe that soldiers follow orders, then we must believe that they would follow their superiors orders and turn on their fellow countrymen.

If we beleive that soldiers have a moral or otherwise stance that means they wouldn;t follow orders they judge to be 'illegal' or against their personal code, then, of course these brave men and women wouldn;t fire upon their fellow citizens.

The problem is that, if soldiers just picked and chose what orders they followed based on morals or sense of justice or what they view as right or legal, then they'd be pretty ineffective soldiers.

Therefore, I can fully imagine soldiers turning on their brothers and sisters, because thats what they are trained to do, to follow orders. Yes, we've heard from people saying they know soldiers that say they wouldn;t, but they don;t speak for them all, for every soldier who will fully follow his duties when in foreign countries, but then flips on his 'moral center' when dealing with his own countrymen, there are many others saying 'Yes Sir, No Sir, Three bags full Sir' and will happily comply and blow them away whislt on their way to control the rest of the populace.

Prehaps a cynical, but entirely possible idea...

EDIT: Just wanted to point out that this is not meant to offend, simply an idea, and not one I throw myself behind. I also did not intend to make any such sweeping statements as 'soliders have no moral compass' or anything like that, merely that it can be observed that they will follow orders, that could prehaps be of lower moral standards, and yet apparnelty they would hold themseleves to higher ideals at home. Ahain, apolgises, I didn;t mean to offend...

[edit on 26-12-2008 by Vector J]



reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 06:00 PM by TheRepublic
reply to post by jfj123



not to rehash the civil war but you have heard of shermans march to the sea havnt you?

that was brutality and it was random and carried out against civilians.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 06:01 PM by dooper
reply to post by Vector J



There are a proverbial $*itload of orders that soldiers will not follow. Don't think that just because orders come down the line that they are carved in stone and originated on the mountain.

I went round and round with my officers on stupid orders alone. I can tell you what happens. If you get orders to do something that will get you killed foolishly, you'll not do it.

If you get orders to do something that may get you killed, but everyone is doing what they can to minimize deaths to the soldiers, then they'll do it.

If they tell you to throw down on civilians, you may have one or two who would, but trust me, they won't make a habit of it.

Either the officers get fragged, or the shooters themselves are shot. Normal soldiers prefer the known. They have a moral center. There are lines that they as a group will not cross.

In any population, there will be a few, just like on a typical Bell Curve, that are outside the norm. Fortunately, they normally don't last long, once they begin to actually operate outside the norm.

I'm not concerned at all that our soldiers will just throw down on their countrymen. And if I were a soldier, I'd be some kind of pissed that anyone would suggest such a thing.

As far as Kent State - UNTRAINED young men, who were having $#it thrown at them, lots of yelling, and a few either got pissed or scared. They never were shown how to face an angry crowd.

Each man, even in crowd, can feel mighty alone. If no one would have been yelling and throwing things, this would have never happened.

It is always unfortunate that those who instigated these events never seem to get shot. Just bystanders.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 06:11 PM by Vector J
reply to post by dooper



My apologies if I offended you, that was not my intent. I was aiming to present an idea that I'd had, and one that on further reflection I tend not to fully agree with...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Rothschild Speaks: Want\'s One World Currency
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags
ACTA and You - Important Video - It has Begun
  Posted 14 days ago with 15 member flags
Know Thine Enemy! Iran Warns of Coming Great Event.
  Posted 9 days ago with 12 member flags
Overpopulation is a scam
  Posted 9 days ago with 8 member flags
Obama/Soros Pushing Class Warfare
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags