Terrorist Attack, Washington DC, Inauguration Day

And just to help move things along on inauguration day in case of a terrorist attack. They want to ensure..uhh..i mean warn people that the cell phone networks might be down that day...no pictures,video,text messages, or phone calls...


www.washingtonpost.com...

The reason for their faux treason or not telling us what is really going to happen (assuming that they do know details but are just letting out a dribble of a generic warning) is that they dont want to "panic the people" needlessly (or at least prematurely, ie, before the incident).

I have read this forum and believe me there are a lot of people that are not even aware of what could and i repeat could happen. It has already been established that Obama is not African but Muslim so if he really is an american that would make him Muslim/American and according to his belief in the koran he cannot denounce the faith or he will be beheaded.\
The Muslim's are the ones that took down the twin towers to kill as many American's as possible and if we think about that why don't we think about how many people would be at the inaugration possibly MILLION'S and in that the revenge for Obama could be killed and MILLION'S of innocent people. If that does not register in your thought's you have a problem. Something else to think about is why won't Obama show his "Birth Certificate" I for one of "WE THE PEOPLE" want to know is he born in Kenya or is Obama not his father or are the dates of his birth wrong or what is the reason for not letting the American people know.
My daddy always told me if you lie with dogs you will smell like a dog and if you hang with crooked politions you are prolly crooked. and one last thing which should have a lot of concern to the American People is Obama wants to change the constitution and if you want to see what we should be concerned about just Google "con con new constitution" and read for yourself. if this is passed we will not be able to post on these forums without government approval that is my two cents worth "May God Watch over this Great Nation before it is too late"

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

---

Sorry to burst your bubble, but I think that by now it's safe to say that certain elements in the United States government were responsible for that.

reply to post by enigmania

---

Thank you, I was going to say that.

The possibility of something happening before then is likely. Dick Cheney is the greatest evil this world has ever faced, just ask Paul Craig Roberts, he knows.

In just a few weeks the world can be ablaze....

So which topic are we talking about, assassination, or terror attack. Those are two different things with different motivations.

I doubt that Obama has anything to worry about in the way of assassination. Most of the elements in our society who are likely to attempt an assassination, voted for Obama.

Several people have mentioned white supremicists, skin heads, etc. However, with the exception of MLK Jr., I know of no assassination that these groups ever attempted.

On the other hand the Manson family tried to bump off Gerald Ford, twice.

Also, Michael Moore talks about a planned ambush of President Bushes motorcade on the day of the first Bush innauguration. He claims that the crowd was armed with tomatoes and eggs, we have his word on that. (wink wink) The Secret Service redirected the motorcade and thwarted their plans.

Last of all, on the topic of assassination, the Secret Service knows what they are doing and there will be plenty of police presence on the scene on innauguration day.

The topic of a terrorist attack is something else. A large outdoor gathering of Americans of all types, is a very tempting target for al-Quada. I am sure that they have taken notice. It is very difficult to stop a few committed individuals from carrying out a terror attack, especially if they are willing to die in the attempt.

What form would a terror attack take?

Well, one of the easiest things to do would be to highjack an airliner and crash it into the crowd. It would be impossible to clear everyone out in time. The death toll would be high. I am sure though that there will be a number of armed fighter aircraft in the air, with a huge no fly zone.

Something almost as effective would be to highjack a bus or some other large vehicle and plow it into the crowd. If they planned a few weeks ahead they could disguise their own vehicle and pack it full of explosives. This would be almost as effective as the highjacked airliner. There will be plenty of traffic barriers in place though. If the crowd estimates are accurate though, the potential for this type of attack would be very great.

Then there is the possibility of a series of suicide attacks. Something like the London bombings. A number of disguised individuals, wearing or carrying bombs, all strategically placed and timed to go off in stages. The crowd could be made to stampede and the death toll from the stampede alone could be thousands. There will be bomb dogs on the scene though, along with metal detectors, and plain clothes police. Still this type of attack cannot be ruled out.

Then there is the possiblitly of a disease vector being released in the crowd. This type of attack may take days before it is recognized. If the terrorists have a bio-weapon and are willing to wait for the delayed effect, then this is something that they might try. We don't know if al-Quada has the ability to carry out this type of attack. If they do though, this is the type of event that would cause them to use it.

These are a few of the possibilities.

I would like to mention one other thing. I know that during the election, a lot of fur was ruffled over the question of whether Obama is or isn't a Muslim. Regardless of whether he is or not, there are a lot of Muslims around the world who think that he is, because of his father, and because he has a Muslim name. This could work to our advantage, since many Muslims would be reluctant to carry out an attack on a fellow Muslim. Again, I am not saying that Barack Hussein Obama is a Muslim, I am saying that many Muslims believe that he is.

reply to post by enigmania

---

I don't see why it's "safe to say" that certain elements of the US Gov. brought down the WTC.

In fact everything that I saw on 9/11 and since says that Osama bin Laden and his buddies did it. Including, Osama himself on three different occastions. Also, in the Middle East they revere the "magnificent 19" and they believe the OBL did it.

It is one thing to say that you believe otherwise, but don't assume that everyone takes it for a fact that your wild eyed conspiracy theory is a fact.

reply to post by lunarminer

---

I think that ALL air traffic will be grounded for several hours prior to the event.
Nope, I'm wrong


[edit on 26-12-2008 by Muundoggie]

reply to post by Muundoggie

---

Well certainly air traffic in and out of the DC area will be shut down for the duration of the innauguration ceremony. They can't shut it down for the whole day though. It is a certainty that there will be alert birds in the air with a full load of missiles.

So, the highjacking idea is a long shot at best.

Call me cynical...I dont believe anything that happens anymore after Oklahoma City and all the loose ends on that operation. 911 was about the sloppiest one yet.

I yawn at the rulers that the gods intrusted to run the planet and they can no longer hide in the shadows...that might sound arrogant but I find it to be where Im at in this point in time

Think it will still be a good day for a nuke. Lots of people, congress, both old and new administrations and most of supreme court.

I was just there 2 hours ago and I can tell you that they are pulling out all the stops. They expect 5 million people to show up.

What they are doing now is that the federal employees are off the fri before and mon after. All federal buildings(so most buildings) will be closed with no access whatsoever.

I doubt there will be a security gaurd in the area with any time off.

There is a ton of security anyways.
No one is going to move without it being watched.

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

---

Ok first of all Mr. Anonymous, contrary to the above statement.. it has NOT been established that Obama is a Muslim.. and FYI there is a difference between religion and race, Obama IS of African origin contrary to what you say.

Second, I happen to live in Saudi Arabia where Islam is the main religion, "officially" it's a 100% Muslim country, but in reality it is 90% Muslim. I am NOT a religious person, but I can assure you that NO WHERE in the Quran does it state that someone who denounces Islam or whatever is to be beheaded. You(and others) contribute to ignorance and religious stereotyping when you make stupid statements like this, don't talk about something you don't know **it about and without any evidence either.




The Muslims? ... you phrase that in a way to make it seem like Islam and Muslims as a 'collective whole' have nothing better to do in their lives than to seek the torment of American people or those differ from them. Again.. YOU are wrong. They have lives of their own to worry about(work, education, research, development, marital/family affairs etc..) and not flying about in air planes messing with other nations because of difference in beliefs.

I am not denying that there are groups who use the name of God or religion to seek followers who would help them achieve their political goals. But Islam is NOT a terrorist religion as you make it out to be. Perhaps you need to be reminded of the Christian extremists in Ireland or the very real threat of Zionism which is a form of Jewish extremism which arguably control every major influential position in the world(media, hollywood, congress etc...). But you don't hear anyone talking against those religions do you?.. Just because some minorities of extremists exist doesn't mean that a particular religion is based on such an extreme nature or is any affiliated to these minorities.

But I will say that there is NOT one shred of solid evidence to say that Muslims carried out the attacks of 9/11. IMO it isn't even logical that a bunch of uneducated rebel individuals were able to carry out an attack of this magnitude on American soil. I refuse to believe that the CIA had no knowledge of an eminent threat (perhaps they know more than let on?). It is my opinion that whatever group carried this out must have been extremely efficient, intelligent, and precisely coordinated and well planned to be able to pull this off. Doesn't really sound like a bunch of amateur fanatics to me. The purpose of this attack? .. again, it is my opinion that the purpose of such an attack was to justify conquest in the middle east and invasion of a sovereign nation(Iraq) not to mention demonizing Arabs and Muslims. And in this case, the Zionists ring a bell. Israel have long dictated U.S foreign policy, to them.. killing a few hundred of God's NOT chosen people only serves their "greater good" and allows them to attain their goals. If you notice, since 9/11.. the concept of terrorism has been promoted by the controlled media outlets over and over again throughout these years. Ask yourself.. what is the point of promoting this 'term' to the point of insanity?

So Mr. Anonymous, next time you want to make ignorant statements like the ones above, at least register your own user name.

Peace all,

Majorion

well I'm going to the inauguration (class trip thing) so if I survive ill be sure to tell of the chaos that is sure to ensue.

but its a pretty prime target ill admit, I mean its almost like throwing a baby seal at a polar bear.

Got to throw the BS flag here. Ok a "part of that percentage" lets say .1%, and I bet there is a lot more that sees Bush as the anti-christ.

BTW, he has a long way to go before he is similar to JFK.

Speaking of numbers...the country is about 45%/45% demarcate to republicans and about 10% independent, and just maybe those who voted against him did it because they had republican values, and not beacause he was black.



[edit on 27-12-2008 by Xtrozero]

reply to post by Majorion

---

Not a bad post but...

Osama bin Laden carried out the attack. He admitted it on video three different times. Why doubt him? Not only did he do it, but he warned the US years in advance that such an attack was coming. Again, why doubt him?

Also, who said that the "Magnificent 19" were uneducated, slobs, who were religiously motivated? The fact is, Al-Quada is politically motivated, and the 19 were well trained and educated. If you live in Saudi then you know that the 19 are celebrated as heros and not CIA stooges. So, if you are honest with yourself, you know that the 19 were in fact Muslims. Maybe not the sort of Muslims you would want to hang out with, but they were who they were.

I won't spend much time on the fact that 17 of the 19 were Saudi and the other two were Kuwaiti. There can be no doubt that this is because Osama trusted others of Saudi and Kuwaiti origin more than others. Since Osama's family is Saudi but of Kuwaiti origin.

I also won't spend much time on the fact that Osama bin Laden was a former Saudi Intelligence Officer. Something that the Saudi's don't like to admit for obvious reasons. It was widely reported however, back in 1979, when Osama was sent to Afghanistan to help the rebels at the request of the Saudi government.

So, we don't have to look too far to find a political connection for Osama but it aint the Jews.

I'd like to see those video tapes...

Are you sure it was realy him?

I'd like to see those video tapes...

Are you sure it was realy him?

the only way anything will happen is if they are running a practice drill on the day, you know the type of drill that later is found to be reality and some enlisted personal don't know whether to tell their superiors just in case they are wrong and look stupid for confusing a drill with reality.

My prediction:

Obama is going to relish the insane enthusiasm of the crowd and mood of the country and produce an inaugural speech that will be considered an historic event that will energize and motivate the country.

delius

[edit on 27-12-2008 by delius]

[edit on 27-12-2008 by delius]