This topic is in the Political Ideology discussion forum.  (rss)


Another freak repugnant out of the closet


<<  1    2    3    4  >>



reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 05:55 PM by gordo



Originally posted by jsobecky

Colonel, what is the point of your original post? There are plenty of gay, Democratic politicians. So what?

There are plenty of people who support gay marriage that intend to vote Republican this fall. So what?

There are plenty of Democrats who are against gay marriage. So what?


What good can come of these divisive posts?





Because it lets him point his finger at the Republican Party and spout his holier than thou bs. What he forgets is that whenever you point your finger at somebody, and make accusations, you end up with several fingers pointed back at yourself.



[Edited on 6-4-2004 by gordo]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 05:56 PM by Bobbo


i think blatant bashing of homosexuals from a moderator is ridiculous.

Just my 2 cents.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:01 PM by J0HNSmith



Originally posted by Bobbo
i think blatant bashing of homosexuals from a moderator is ridiculous.

Just my 2 cents.


Yeah and you also claim to see dead people.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:10 PM by topsecretombomb


i wouldnt be surprised if this persons been molesting his children all their lives. but hey! im thinking aloud.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:13 PM by forsakenwayfarer



Originally posted by Bobbo
i think blatant bashing of homosexuals from a moderator is ridiculous.

Just my 2 cents.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:20 PM by nyarlathotep


Hey colonel, no offense, but did you just learn the word repugnant? I mean you use the word a little too much. Try a thesaurus or a dictionary. Repugnant- causing a person to feel great dislike or distaste; disgusting. Try disgusting. I know it might not sound like you're as smart, but a least it won't sound like you just learned the word or something. Oh and by the way, repugnant is an adjective, not a noun.

[Edited on 4-6-2004 by nyarlathotep]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:50 PM by KrazyJethro



Originally posted by nyarlathotep
Hey colonel, no offense, but did you just learn the word repugnant? I mean you use the word a little too much. Try a thesaurus or a dictionary. Repugnant- causing a person to feel great dislike or distaste; disgusting. Try disgusting. I know it might not sound like you're as smart, but a least it won't sound like you just learned the word or something. Oh and by the way, repugnant is an adjective, not a noun.

[Edited on 4-6-2004 by nyarlathotep]


You obviously have not been here long. Certainly not long enough to know that he uses that as an alternative to Republican.

Take some time to learn your surroundings before you step out and make yourself look foolish.

Just tryin to help.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:51 PM by ZeddicusZulZorander



Originally posted by nyarlathotep
Hey colonel, no offense, but did you just learn the word repugnant? I mean you use the word a little too much. Try a thesaurus or a dictionary. Repugnant- causing a person to feel great dislike or distaste; disgusting. Try disgusting. I know it might not sound like you're as smart, but a least it won't sound like you just learned the word or something. Oh and by the way, repugnant is an adjective, not a noun.



Hahahahaha! I could actually point you to the thread, where in true Al Gore style....the Colonel claimed to invent the word.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 07:58 PM by Phoenix


I think the Colonel stepped in Repugnacy in this post and showed what a Repugnant hypocrit he really is, its really sad to see such a champion for diversity come out and bash the DemocRat base the way he has done here, will the foolishness never cease?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:03 PM by Bobbo


repugnant
SYLLABICATION: re·pug·nant
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: r-pgnnt KEY
ADJECTIVE: 1. Arousing disgust or aversion; offensive or repulsive: morally repugnant behavior.
2. Logic Contradictory; inconsistent.
ETYMOLOGY: Middle English, antagonistic, from Old French, from Latin repugnns, repugnant-, present participle of repugnre, to fight against. See repugn.

so one would logically come to the conclusion that...

colonel = repugnant



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:05 PM by observer



Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
You know what, Colonel? Ive always had this image in my mind, of geaorge bush in pumps, spurs, and chaps, riding bareback on top of rumsfeld, who is dressed up for the rocky horror picture show.

Do you think i could be remote viewing what goes on in the oval office after lights out?


I now am unable to get the image of Rumsfeld dressed like Dr Frankenfurter out of my head... I must gouge out my brain. Thanks alot Skadi!!!!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:09 PM by Bobbo


I agree, I'll end up having dreams tonight about him in front of his podium tearing off his suit, to reveal his fishnets and black panties, and singing "sweet transvestite"- with Paul Wolfowitz playing the role of Riff Raff.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:13 PM by Phoenix


sKerry is even more Repugnant then any of the examples put forth so far as a nightmare vision.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:17 PM by Colonel


I can't believe this. I really can't. Everyday, you see the repugnants out there, demonizing gays and gay marriages as agaisnt GOOOODDDDD and all that's holy and now one of their own is caught (and not the first time) and they get "their panties in a bunch" because I posted it to show their hypocrisy.

Now, I'm the bad guy.

They should be villifying this dudette if they had ANY kind of moral consistency. But, you know they won't. You know it.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:18 PM by nyarlathotep


[


You obviously have not been here long. Certainly not long enough to know that he uses that as an alternative to Republican.

Take some time to learn your surroundings before you step out and make yourself look foolish.

Just tryin to help.


Seems I'm not the only one who feels the same way. I think you are the one who is foolish.


reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:23 PM by Bobbo


who the heck are you directing this towards?


Originally posted by nyarlathotep
[


You obviously have not been here long. Certainly not long enough to know that he uses that as an alternative to Republican.

Take some time to learn your surroundings before you step out and make yourself look foolish.

Just tryin to help.


Seems I'm not the only one who feels the same way. I think you are the one who is foolish.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:23 PM by Colonel


In the meantime, while these repugnants go in the back room and wear the lip gloss, thongs, and high heels, they are going after people who view straight vanilla sex:

Obscenity: For the first time in 10 years, the U.S. government is spending millions to file charges across the country.

WASHINGTON - Lam Nguyen's job is to sit for hours in a chilly, quiet room devoid of any color but gray and look at pornography. This job, which Nguyen does earnestly from 9 to 5, surrounded by a half-dozen other "computer forensic specialists" like him, has become the focal point of the Justice Department's operation to rid the world of porn.

www.baltimoresun.com...


Am I the only one that sees a problem here??????



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:38 PM by KrazyJethro


I see a serious problem.

In my experience I have seen more sex scandels with Republicans than Democrats. That is a problem, one such that keeps me from being a Republican-free conservative.

I am also against the censuring of America going on on all fronts it seems.

No gay sex
No oral sex
No looking at sex

Welcome to the Puritan's America all over again. Maybe we can reinstitute witch burning again.

That'd be fun.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:39 PM by Bobbo


I'd sign up to burn witches. they're repugnant.

haha



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:42 PM by Colonel


KJ: It completely astounds and sickens me. You know these guys are sick deviants behind closed doors. No group seems so obsessed with the sexual affairs of the public than repugnants. Yet, they will stand on some stage and claim the high moral ground.


And people wonder why I call them "repugnant."



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3    4  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.117 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread