 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 05:55 PM by gordo
|
Originally posted by jsobecky
Colonel, what is the point of your original post? There are plenty of gay, Democratic politicians. So what?
There are plenty of people who support gay marriage that intend to vote Republican this fall. So what?
There are plenty of Democrats who are against gay marriage. So what?
What good can come of these divisive posts?

Because it lets him point his finger at the Republican Party and spout his holier than thou bs. What he forgets is that whenever you point your finger
at somebody, and make accusations, you end up with several fingers pointed back at yourself.
[Edited on 6-4-2004 by gordo]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 05:56 PM by Bobbo
|
i think blatant bashing of homosexuals from a moderator is ridiculous.
Just my 2 cents.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:01 PM by J0HNSmith
|
Originally posted by Bobbo
i think blatant bashing of homosexuals from a moderator is ridiculous.
Just my 2 cents. 
Yeah and you also claim to see dead people.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:10 PM by topsecretombomb
|
i wouldnt be surprised if this persons been molesting his children all their lives. but hey! im thinking aloud.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:13 PM by forsakenwayfarer
|
Originally posted by Bobbo
i think blatant bashing of homosexuals from a moderator is ridiculous.
Just my 2 cents. 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:20 PM by nyarlathotep
|
Hey colonel, no offense, but did you just learn the word repugnant? I mean you use the word a little too much. Try a thesaurus or a dictionary.
Repugnant- causing a person to feel great dislike or distaste; disgusting. Try disgusting. I know it might not sound like you're as smart, but a
least it won't sound like you just learned the word or something. Oh and by the way, repugnant is an adjective, not a noun.
[Edited on 4-6-2004 by nyarlathotep]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:50 PM by KrazyJethro
|
Originally posted by nyarlathotep
Hey colonel, no offense, but did you just learn the word repugnant? I mean you use the word a little too much. Try a thesaurus or a dictionary.
Repugnant- causing a person to feel great dislike or distaste; disgusting. Try disgusting. I know it might not sound like you're as smart, but a
least it won't sound like you just learned the word or something. Oh and by the way, repugnant is an adjective, not a noun.
[Edited on 4-6-2004 by nyarlathotep] 
You obviously have not been here long. Certainly not long enough to know that he uses that as an alternative to Republican.
Take some time to learn your surroundings before you step out and make yourself look foolish.
Just tryin to help.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 06:51 PM by ZeddicusZulZorander
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 07:58 PM by Phoenix
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:03 PM by Bobbo
|
repugnant
SYLLABICATION: re·pug·nant
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: r-pgnnt KEY
ADJECTIVE: 1. Arousing disgust or aversion; offensive or repulsive: morally repugnant behavior.
2. Logic Contradictory; inconsistent.
ETYMOLOGY: Middle English, antagonistic, from Old French, from Latin repugnns, repugnant-, present participle of repugnre, to fight against. See
repugn.
so one would logically come to the conclusion that...
colonel = repugnant
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:05 PM by observer
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:09 PM by Bobbo
|
I agree, I'll end up having dreams tonight about him in front of his podium tearing off his suit, to reveal his fishnets and black panties, and
singing "sweet transvestite"- with Paul Wolfowitz playing the role of Riff Raff.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:13 PM by Phoenix
|
sKerry is even more Repugnant then any of the examples put forth so far as a nightmare vision.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:17 PM by Colonel
|
I can't believe this. I really can't. Everyday, you see the repugnants out there, demonizing gays and gay marriages as agaisnt GOOOODDDDD and all
that's holy and now one of their own is caught (and not the first time) and they get "their panties in a bunch" because I posted it to show their
hypocrisy.
Now, I'm the bad guy.
They should be villifying this dudette if they had ANY kind of moral consistency. But, you know they won't. You know it.  
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:18 PM by nyarlathotep
|
[ 
You obviously have not been here long. Certainly not long enough to know that he uses that as an alternative to Republican.
Take some time to learn your surroundings before you step out and make yourself look foolish.
Just tryin to help.
Seems I'm not the only one who feels the same way. I think you are the one who is foolish.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:23 PM by Bobbo
|
who the heck are you directing this towards?
Originally posted by nyarlathotep
[ 
You obviously have not been here long. Certainly not long enough to know that he uses that as an alternative to Republican.
Take some time to learn your surroundings before you step out and make yourself look foolish.
Just tryin to help. 
Seems I'm not the only one who feels the same way. I think you are the one who is foolish.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:23 PM by Colonel
|
In the meantime, while these repugnants go in the back room and wear the lip gloss, thongs, and high heels, they are going after people who view
straight vanilla sex:
Obscenity: For the first time in 10 years, the U.S. government is spending millions to file charges across the country.
WASHINGTON - Lam Nguyen's job is to sit for hours in a chilly, quiet room devoid of any color but gray and look at pornography. This job, which
Nguyen does earnestly from 9 to 5, surrounded by a half-dozen other "computer forensic specialists" like him, has become the focal point of the
Justice Department's operation to rid the world of porn.
www.baltimoresun.com...
Am I the only one that sees a problem here??????
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:38 PM by KrazyJethro
|
I see a serious problem.
In my experience I have seen more sex scandels with Republicans than Democrats. That is a problem, one such that keeps me from being a
Republican-free conservative.
I am also against the censuring of America going on on all fronts it seems.
No gay sex
No oral sex
No looking at sex
Welcome to the Puritan's America all over again. Maybe we can reinstitute witch burning again.
That'd be fun.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:39 PM by Bobbo
|
I'd sign up to burn witches. they're repugnant.
haha
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 6-4-2004 @ 08:42 PM by Colonel
|
KJ: It completely astounds and sickens me. You know these guys are sick deviants behind closed doors. No group seems so obsessed with the sexual
affairs of the public than repugnants. Yet, they will stand on some stage and claim the high moral ground.
And people wonder why I call them "repugnant."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |