AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Conspiracies in Religions discussion forum.  (rss)


If ATS Is To Survive, Mankind Needs To Stop Making Reactionary Reverse Opinion Thread Titles.




Topic started on 24-12-2008 @ 06:55 PM by prevenge


God Hates All Non Christians-- PROOF!!
wow awesome thread ! gotta check this one out!! I mean.. PROOF?? sweeeet.

screw that that was bogus I'm gonna make a post just to mock and get attention to my response that could have easily been a post in his thread....
Non Christians Hate God -- PROOF!
there we go.. that oughtta garner myself enough attention, and stars for my pseudo facsimili of wit.


I mean just the other day I saw one saying :
Doctors Discover a miniature NavalFC Growing in a Baby's Brain.

then someone retorted with:
Doctors Discover A Baby's Brain in NavalFC

some more great examples...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

they've GOTTA STOP! This is MADNESS I SAY!

See these type of reactionary reverse titling threads are getting old.
Clever MAYBE the first time years ago, but now it's just for attention.


Seriously. they're dumb.
And they take the same discussion that was going on in the origonal thread, and split it up into 2 or 3 or 4 threads.
It's redundant and a time waster.
If someone held an opinion I saw had a lot of insight, with some great reference, I might have missed it because I was busy reading the other thread on the subject that was being discussed at the exact same time.

IT's just an excuse for some poster in the thread to try to make his post that was going to be in the original thread.. more visible and thus more read by people.
It's annoying.

if not for the children.. think about my poor bookmarks folder.. it can only take so much.
thank you

-


[edit on 24-12-2008 by prevenge]



   copyright & usage 
Click here for more Conspiracies in Religions topics
Hot Topics   |   Top Topics   |   This Week   |   Subscribe   |   Home


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 06:59 PM by eNumbra


Agreed, Star and flag.

It's funny once or twice in cases where the retort is a bit absurd, but the "god this, religion that." is a burden on the forum.

[edit on 12/24/2008 by eNumbra]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 07:00 PM by RFBurns


This should have been posted in the Board Buisness and suggestions forum instead of the Conspiracies in Religion forum.

Isnt that alone kind of mirroring what your talking about? Or is it to just attract more attention since this forum gets more attention than the Board Buisness one? The thread itself has nothing to do with conspiracies in religion.

Just curious.



HO HO HO!!!!

[edit on 24-12-2008 by RFBurns]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 07:03 PM by prevenge


Originally posted by RFBurns
This should have been posted in the Board Buisness and suggestions forum instead of the Conspiracies in Religion forum.

Isnt that alone kind of mirroring what your talking about? Or is it to just attract more attention since this forum gets more attention than the Board Buisness one? The thread itself has nothing to do with conspiracies in religion.

Just curious.



HO HO HO!!!!

[edit on 24-12-2008 by RFBurns]


ya that was on accident.
please MODS put it where it should be.
or wherever you feel it's best suited.

no wait put it where i'll get the most attention.
jk.

-



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
















































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.055 seconds
6 total database queries (1)

(:)








The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.

This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownershipwho maintains
strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.






It looks like you're using some kind of software designed to block advertising while surfing our site.

We work very hard to provide an efficient Internet presence that services over 200,000 daily visits from people and automated web spiders. A large web site like this, that can handle that amount of traffic, is increasingly expensive to operate. Our only viable source of revenue (for now) are the ads displayed on each page.

If you enjoy our content, please enable our domain in your ad-blocking package.

more information       contact us

[hide this message]