I wrote this post on another thread and I feel there is more truth to this then what we know:


Here is an option that no-one talks about: supposing the anti-Christ is actually a good thing and one promoted by God? Perhaps this composite being or individual is a metaphor for a huge change and one that may even be positive?

It supports my argument that the Bible was written for different reasons with an entirely different message. Perhaps the anti-Christ needs to be viewed inside out, or the opposite of what man has been taught, or thinks?

Responding to the OP there is a AntiChrist. The bible talks about him, and so does Jesus Christ. And the Anti Christ will make known to everyone that he exist, he will claim to be God. God will make known his will too. God bless

When did Jesus mention this Antichrist of yours? Don't you see that you are looking for a scapegoat? Something unique to place all your hate against? If you so hate this imaginary Antichrist of yours, and rejoice over him being killed and and hate when he is revoked.... What makes you better that the guys crying "Crucify!" last time this exact scenario happened, need I say more? If I were you I'd think less of imaginary "enemies" making world peace and rediculing traditional religion, and start thinking about how you can be a better fellow to your enemies. For that is what we are all told by Jesus: Don't hate your enemies, love your enemies instead, for then they might save you and the ones you care for! It's real simple logics and it works. Had people bought Hitlers paintings when he in solitude and poverty tried to sell his at times brilliant artwork at the streets of Vienna. Perhaps we had never seen WW2? How about you change your folly hate and conspiring mind and rather started to love your enemies, to value their good sides, you might actually in time get a voice up for their lesser good sides. See? Jesus taught us some important features to the art of diplomacy, and you would rather be an enemy of Jesus than one of his diplomats? GTFOOH!

[edit on 5/1/2009 by Neo Christian Mystic]

Divide and conquer is a strategy of war and politics, not a means of conspiracy, which involves undermining, etc. The oldest form of conspiracy is done with money and was executed uppon among others, Julius Cæsar. His coleagues paid his own son to kill him, which reminds me of another conspiracy: why isn't Brutus mentioned as his true son, while Ptolomy XV is?

Divide and conquer can be used to fragmentise resistance and make brothers turn against eachother, and ancient trick. Where is your wit? And why did you claim that I am without reason after the post I just posted? Please?

[edit on 5/1/2009 by Neo Christian Mystic]

You cant claim to be a Christian and believe in Jesus words and not believe in the antiChrist. Revelations talks about the AntiChrist and what is revelation the revelation from Jesus Christ. Right now I am too tired to post the scriptures but tommorw I will.

And you can say that Christian is a traping door all you want. God will prove himself. God will make known his power, love, and judgement. What will you do when its to late and his judgment is right in front of you. Life after death is a big gamable. And if you want the truth all you have to do is pray and have little faith and let God work is works.

Then you add to the text of Revelation. The Greek word Antichristos isn't mentioned and is never throughout the NT the name or title of a single person, but an archtype of the nonbeliever according to Saul Paulus, the Quissling deceiver who managed to remove the focus from the teachings of Jesus to magic and wonders and snaketalk.

Rev speaks about a certain false prophet who will pave the way for a certain hydraheaded beast. None of these is THE Antichrist, for he doesn't exist other than in your mind. A man who doesnot believe that Jesus lived is an antichrist.