Originally posted by CameronFox
I could be wrong, but part of the math was to include the plane being able to pull up and over the pentagon.
You are shifting the argument.
Reheat and all of your war-crime-apologist buddies claimed that ANY north side approach is impossible.
We proved them completely wrong with math and physics.
However much the plane pulled-up is entirely irrelevant to this because if the plane was ANYWHERE on the north side as unanimously claimed by all the witnesses, and proven possible by math, it proves it did not hit the building.
So all other minor details such as exact bank angle, exact pull-up, exact radius etc. are irrelevant and have plenty of room for a significant margin of error and it is unreasonable to expect eyewitnesses to accurately report such things anyway.
The point is that you have NOTHING to prove the eyewitnesses all simultaneously hallucinated the plane on the north side.
You are resorting to micro-scrutinizing the witness statements to hide the absolute proven fact that it is entirely possible for a plane to fly north of the citgo.
You have no choice but to admit:
MATH AND PHYSICS PROVE A NORTH SIDE APPROACH IS ENTIRELY POSSIBLE FOR A CONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT.
So unless you can point out the errors in the math presented, you have no choice but to concede.