|
reply posted on 23-12-2008 @ 07:33 PM by funny_pom
|

Now, i can understand the issue with having over 10 kids in a single homestead. resources being as they are and what not. However, there is a
phenomena taking place in western nations where no one is having any kids at all. the birth rate is either 0 or in the negatives and this creates a
problem. no kids today means no adults tomorrow. To put it plainly, all you middle aged folks today will have no youngsters to get money from. there
will be old people everywhere, people who cannot work and make a good deal of money.
It will be the socially devised version of "Children of Men".
please dont have a million kids but also for the love of god don't listen to them 'voluntary human extinction' nut jobs. Have 2 kids and be happy,
whilst keeping the species strong.
besides over population is natural in all of nature, its dealt with in an effective way whereby the species is reduced to a controllable size, i
believe that's what is happening now.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 02:29 AM by HulaAnglers
|
Quality is the issue for me - not quantity. Proper commitment between two intelligent adults who enjoy fulfilling their respective functions is the
most important criteria - emotional sanity has been cultivated in both(female intuition and male rational perfect blend) - a stong creative and
healthy environment is in place to receive and sustain this new life. The parents and or grandparents should be thouroughly knowledgable about - mind
body and soul health! The future after the end, will look more like the beginning before industry removed us from our true natures.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 02:02 PM by TasteTheMagick
|
reply to post by kettlebellysmith
Bull! Since then, I'll have you know that I've spent LESS days sick. So my employer can kiss my ass. Also, it's entirely my choice and I'm sick to
death of people complaining. You don't like it: don't do it. And as to your medicare/aid crap, I know for a fact that I'll never be on it because
there's no way in hell I'd take it.
Furthermore: I don't care if you changed your mind. If you are incapable of living without being attached to a machine, you'll just have to accept
the fact that it is time for you to die. But it's people like you that fight for the "right" to live. We waste a lot of energy keeping people on
life support, while in reality the "natural" way would just be to let these people move on and die.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 02:25 PM by hotbakedtater
|
reply to post by marg6043
This is so true. I was discussing these Duggars earlier today, and was wondering if she had to actually be sewn up or something to keep the baby from
falling out. I don't hear about her being on total bedrest or anything either. Who knows, but that aspect of the 18 kids thing(as a woman with the
same parts!) really creeps me out.
As to it being a crime, heck no! Do yall realize they built that home themselves? I admire the work ethic and morals these parents are instilling in
these kids. The oldest one actually found a girl willing to marry into the family! And for all her kids and age, Michelle looks beautiful. I think in
no way is this an eco crime, this family is an asset to our planet.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 02:29 PM by Clearskies
|
Originally posted by Nohup
The Duggars are part of a religious movement called "Quiverfull," which advocates having as many children as possible so they'll be able to fight
the upcoming Holy Wars of Armageddon.
Nohup,
Are you kidding?
They may be of the 'quiverfull' persuasion, but NOT TO FIGHT IN Armageddon!
[edit on 25-12-2008 by Clearskies]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 02:44 PM by Circle
|
reply to post by MandM
I would like to give a direct answer to the question posed at the beginning of this Thread - an unequivical "YES". The Earth's population in 1950
was 2.5 billion. By 1990 it was five billion and today it stands just under seven!! The UNESCO projection for 2050AD is nine billion. This population
growth will cause wars; famines; desertification and water shortages; pollution and ecological collapse that will bring about mass extinctions in the
animal and plant kingdoms. If you believe in a God of compassion and care about your fellow man you will NOT have eighteen children. Some evangelical
christians justify large families as part of the God's command in Genesis to go forth and multiply. However, this was in an empty world if you
believe the biblical narrative as it is written. When couples, through a complete selfish disregard go ahead and have this number of children they sin
against us all. They reek havoc on the ecological balance for future generations. It would be much better to improve the quality of life for a much
smaller group of children giving them an abundant and healthy Planet.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 03:53 PM by OhZone
|
If you can produce 18 strong, healthey kids free of genetic defect that's good.
There are a lot of people who should never have children at all, and there should be an agressive manditory sterilization program in place. There are
over 4000 hereditary defects that need to be eliminated.
Tastethemajic, As to people living "beyond their years"..... how many years do you think people should live?
I agree that this life support thing is carried out too often. There comes a time when it is better to die.
The rest of God's command "Be fruitful, and multiply and replenish the Earth.
Replenish means to fill again, but somehow folks seen to think it means breed yourselves to oblivion.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 04:50 PM by TasteTheMagick
|
reply to post by OhZone
I think that as long as you can live without the support of some kind of machine then that's fine. My problem is simply all of the respirators and
feeding tubes and things like that. I mean, I understand that these statements may make me sound like a frigid bitch, but when you can no longer
sustain your own life...I just think it's time to give up the ghost.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 05:14 PM by mrwupy
|
Originally posted by 30 Seconds
that family literally disgusts me.
they cant even support all the children, but they are so ....arggg w/e
but seriously, disgust.
Actually they do support all the kids, I'm sure it's a hand full but they are not on the states dole.
We're talking about Arkansas people, I've lived here all my life. Sure they are strange but by far not the strangest thing I've seen in this land.
The other day I saw a 12 year old girl smoking, IN FRONT OF HER CHILDREN!
Even our former governor Mike Huckabee described this state as a banana republic, and he wasn't joking.
I don't think having 18 children should be considerd a crime. A freak show maybe but few things in this state could escape that classification.
I LOVE living here.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 08:46 PM by arbiture
|
Crime? I don't know. But 18 kids? Thats not a family, thats a herd...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 09:22 PM by mrwupy
|
 
Originally posted by arbiture
Crime? I don't know. But 18 kids? Thats not a family, thats a herd...
Just think, they could have an actual basketball game and have members covering the team, on both freakin' sides.
How kewl is that!!??
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:32 PM by johnnyg5646
|
To the people who said this family is not taking money from the state or federal government, have you considered what federally funded financial aid
packages will give to these children when they reach college? Since a large part of the elidgibility for financial aid is based on the size of the
family and how many kids are currently in college, these kids will likely all get a free ride. This money will come from US tax payers. I somehow
doubt this family can provide college to 18 children without this assistance.
I don't agree with having 18 children. I certainly don't agree with the ridiculous christian beliefs that made them chose to have 18 kids. But, I
also don't think it is my place to decide if they should be able to have these kids or not.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 12:39 PM by Blueracer
|
  
Shame on all of you hateful people for being angry with this family. The people who are for population control/reduction need to practice what they
preach. If you feel that strongly about it, commit suicide. Don't just tell others how to live.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 01:14 PM by FlyersFan
|
   
Originally posted by MandM
Is Having An 18th Child An Eco-Crime Against Humanity?
NO. It's their right as human beings to have as many children as they wish to.
As long as they can afford it I have no problem with it.
Hey .... Ya' know that UBL is one of 64 kids that his father had, right?
If you want to ask about ECO-Crimes ... go take a look at the number of kids that are being pumped out in places where the usual outcome for the
children is just fodder for terrorists to use.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 29-12-2008 @ 01:50 PM by verylowfrequency
|
    
I see no crime except the crime of those who don't mind their own business.
There are single people on this planet that use more resources than this entire family ever will in their lifetimes.
I see nobody starving, I see none of them asking for help, I see a self sufficient family unit.
I see a beautiful family making a good life. What's to protest about that?
Why are the liberals afraid of them? Because they won't grow up needing social services? They don't need no dam village - they are the village.
[edit on 29-12-2008 by verylowfrequency]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 30-12-2008 @ 12:31 PM by Anonymous ATS
|
reply to post by MandM
Beleive it or not, the world can sustain 40 billion people. Yeap 40 billion. The way we manage our resources and fritter away what we have is
unsustainable, so 6 billion is going to overcrowd what we have already. By researching sustainable energy and utilizing it to accommodate a growth in
population as well as the super rich sharing in their wealth, (what person any way is worth 100 billion dollars?) we can sustain a population growth.
The feeding frenzy of panic done by the media and other outlets only causes trouble, producing an inability to really focus on what matters. Our
ability to really grow as a people (metaphorically this time) Having 18 children is a blessing. Having children is a satisfying experience. But to
those who really can't afford it? There are so many avenues that can be taken in this argument, but I really do beleive that if we stop the wars and
get the rich to share and help with the economy we wouldn't be in this hideous mess in the first place.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 08:20 PM by spacebot
|
Eco-crimes or more plainly, crimes against humanity are from people who advocate social movements for people to not having children.
Those people should be locked in a prison with no food.
A woman asked for a child and God gave them 18. God might trying to make a point. What point would that be?
If we weren't so stupid we would lift our eyes upwards and gaze at the million of stars that surround us. These are worlds. Many of them might be
suitable for habitation. Only thing that keeps humankind away from them is our stupidity and laziness.
We don't need 50 million people imported from Africa to Europe because Europeans supposedly do not reproduce enough.. We do not need the global
financial and technological advantage shifting over other countries that traditionally were used to and are governed by totalitarian regimes just so
that PTB, some day not so far in the future as some romantics hoped it would be, if the current trends keep up, soon, they will have a nice dumped
down and docile population so the same PTB can continue their rule upon the unsuspected dumped down and stupefied masses.
Overpopulation could help us realize that we can inhabit other worlds, thus expand and succeed. The problem is THERE IS NO OVERPOPULATION over
resources in reality. Just a psychological war campaign to dumb down and shorten the more achieving and bright part of the population of this planet
and replace them with a more dumped down version of slaves.
This war is NOT NEW! It is as old as mankind herself is. People have to wake up! We are supposed to become wiser by now. Surprisingly we are becoming
more and more stupid each day by succumbing to every God damn theory there is that advocates population thinning.
NO GOD DAMN WAY!
PTB your days are numbered. More and more people are waking up every day from their long slumber and noticing whats going down. I am one of them.
[edit on 6-1-2009 by spacebot]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 12:01 AM by xbranscombex
|
Not unless all 18 become GeoThermalEngineers  )))
Than, yes.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 05:40 PM by hotrodturbo7
|
reply to post by 30 Seconds
They are financially independent.
They have no debt.
All of the children are more intelligent and caring than you could ever hope to be.
Please move on you useless waste of flesh.
Your hogging valuable resources that could be used for a worthwhile being.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |