What you fail to understand is that the Bible doesn't say anything in Black and White.
It is a collection of stories compiled over time as a certain cultures relationship with their beliefs evolved.
It's not a theological compendium, as some might like to see it. And alot of it is completely mis interpreted because most folks today are not
familiar with the literary devices used during the many eras of time the writings in The Bible come from.
In fact, the Jewish interpretation of the same scripture is often completely different from the Christian interpretation of the same passage.
No one can say that a book filled with allegories says anything discreetly. Especially when so many different people see so many different meanings
in the same text.
You say you are arguing against a specific belief system. I don't know what that belief system is, but it is not the belief system espoused by many
Christian Theologians, such as
Paul Tillich,
Meister Eckhart,
Thomas Merton, or
Thomas Aquinas.
And these guys don't always agree either.
Interestingly enough, Aquinas' concept of the nature of God doesn't include omniscience or ominpotence.
Concerning the nature of God, Aquinas felt the best approach, commonly called the via negativa, is to consider what God is not. This led him to
propose five statements about the divine qualities:
1. God is simple, without composition of parts, such as body and soul, or matter and form.
2. God is perfect, lacking nothing. That is, God is distinguished from other beings on account of God's complete actuality.
3. God is infinite. That is, God is not finite in the ways that created beings are physically, intellectually, and emotionally limited. This
infinity is to be distinguished from infinity of size and infinity of number.
4. God is immutable, incapable of change on the levels of God's essence and character.
5. God is one, without diversification within God's self. The unity of God is such that God's essence is the same as God's existence. In
Aquinas's words, "in itself the proposition 'God exists' is necessarily true, for in it subject and predicate are the same."
In this approach, he is following, among others, the Jewish philosopher Maimonides.
Either way, I am not aware of any specific belief system which has supreme authority when discussing the bible. There have always been differences in
interpretation of which none are authoritative.
[edit on 1-1-2009 by HunkaHunka]