I watched a video a year ago that had some Australian guy ho was kind of saying the same thing. But he was saying that they can only be set off at certain places at certain times of the year / day. He said he had the full backing of the Australian prime minister over his theory. But ive never been able to locate the video again since.

Originally posted by footfall
so what did destroy hiroshima and nagasaki if not a nuclear bomb

[edit on 27-12-2008 by footfall]

I'm tired of people like you. Just because the theory is widely considered unorthodox, you mock us dissenters. Obviously, the whole atomic bomb thing was just a cover-up for Godzilla running rampant throughout the Japanese cities. If you look closely at the Hiroshima footage, you may be able to see that it is actually film from the director's cut of Independence Day.

In all seriousness, though, how can anyone doubt the existence of such a weapon? The amount of evidence supporting its existence is so massive that there is no possibility for it to simply be a conspiracy concocted by the powers that be.

What is interesting if one reads the accounts of the bombing of Japan in WW2 is that there was actually more damage done by conventional bombs than by these two Nuclear devices.

Conventional High explosive and Incendiary Bombs did so much more damage to Japanese industry and cities than did these weapons. The accounts of these conventional raids are a horror to read. It was the same with certain raids in Europe.
THese were huge multi plane raids made possible by large bomb loads and the speed by which these new B29 bombers could fly when under way. This made most Japanese air interceptors/air defenses useless.

What is also very telling and indicative that something very different was afoot is how few planes actually went on this raid to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As I recall it was only some three or four planes. The bomber itself carrying the weapon...two or three spotter planes to record camera footage and still photos. As I recall the narrative...the spotter planes stayed far away on the outskirts while the Enola Gay went ahead to history.
Also I believe they were not entirely sure with the first bomb that the plane...Enola Gay would survive the explosion and shock wave.

There were not enough planes on this raid to cause such massive damage with conventional high explosives or Incendiary weapons.

Also...though it has been years since I read the accounts...one of these cities Hiroshima or Nagasaki was actually a secondary or alternate target. Pathfinider planes went ahead to certain cities in the target group to check the weather. One of the targets was judged to overcast and the alternate city was selected and the planes were rerouted to this alternate target.

Nonetheless...there were not sufficient planes sent on these missions to cause such damage with conventional weapons.
Just another facet of looking at this history.

Thanks,
Orangetom

My family originally come from Hiroshima, thankfully they were lucky enough to have moved away before the war. To even postulate that nuclear weapons don't exist is insulting and retarded beyond belief.

What you state in the OP about atoms being split constantly as ionisation just shows a lack of understanding regarding the basic and simple, easily proven physics behind ionisation. Ionisation is the imbalance between protons and electrons in an atom. This is a relatively low energy exchange that as you state happens constantly, nuclear fusion and fission are much higher energy state exchanges, that involve the nuclei of an atom, not the electron shell around the nuclei.