Do Nuclear Bombs Exist?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 09:35 AM by Kiwiemperor
reply to post by violenttorrent



Yeah, considering I studied nuclear weapons and fission for about a month this summer (I was bored, heh heh) yeah they're pretty freakin' real. These things aren't Santa Claus. Maybe i should ask him for one though...

Science has given us three things for sure

Velcro
The Easy Bake Oven
Atomic Weapons ^.^


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 09:56 AM by jd140
Originally posted by violenttorrent
There was another post on ATS a year or two ago which asked the same question. It received the same barrage of "what about hiroshima" responses. Watch my video:
www.youtube.com... - there is no footage of Hiroshima which is definitely identifiable as Hiroshima - just bomb footage ascribed as such.

What is it with people that they can't even consider for one second that something they have only seen movies of on a screen might not be real?



Hiroshima had just been completely destroyed by an atom bomb. Of course it wouldn't look the same as a pic of the city before it was pulverized.

If a person wraps himself in a suit of grenades and then sets them all off at the same time he would not look nothing like the same person pre explosion, but it is still the same person.

Same logic applies to your Hiroshima footage theory.


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 09:58 AM by jd140
Originally posted by Kiwiemperor
reply to
post by violenttorrent



Yeah, considering I studied nuclear weapons and fission for about a month this summer (I was bored, heh heh) yeah they're pretty freakin' real. These things aren't Santa Claus. Maybe i should ask him for one though...

Science has given us three things for sure

Velcro
The Easy Bake Oven
Atomic Weapons ^.^


Don't forget about the Super Bounce Ball.

Man those things were awesome when I was a kid.


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 09:46 PM by clay2 baraka
Originally posted by zerbot565
to be frank i dont belive in the nuke ,

seposedly old ussr and u.s have detonated around 300+ nukes of diffrent form and size , but wheres the fallout.

if it now is true and not just propaganda , then burning the candle at both ends seams to be not just a form of idiocy but also a very real thing world leaders and pawns tend to do.


Also in the Marshall Islands, the United States detonated its largest weapon ever tested, the Bravo shot of March 1, 1954, the equivalent of 1,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs. Bravo exposed the crew of a Japanese fishing boat near Bikini, Marshallese residents downwind from Bikini, and U.S. servicemen to levels of radiation that caused death, and lifelong illness. Following Bravo, U.S. government researchers evacuated some of the islanders and enrolled them in a secret medical experiment, called Project 4.1, to study the effects of radiation on human beings. Later, the U.S. government resettled the unwitting participants in this program on an island highly contaminated with radiation to learn first-hand how human beings ingest and absorb radiation from their environment.

During the Cold War, the United States made immeasurable political strides as nuclear superiority guaranteed status as a superpower, and ushered in a period of nuclear deterrence. This political advancement of the United States did not come without a price for the Marshallese, however, whose health and environment continue to display the scars of U.S. achievements.

Recently the U.S. National Cancer Institute predicted that the Marshallese will experience hundreds more future cancer cases directly linked to the U.S. nuclear weapons testing program. The radiological illnesses from the testing program continue to overwhelm the capabilities of the public health infrastructure in the Marshall Islands. Beyond the participants of Project 4.1, the U.S. government contributes only $7 per patient per month for the communities most affected by the testing program and for people with confirmed radiogenic illnesses, such as cancer.


It's not fallout that caused these extreme cancer rates. It's due to bad poi.

[sigh]

[edit on 12/24/2008 by clay2 baraka]


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 10:16 AM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by zerbot565



Finally someone with more than just ions between their ears! Thanks Zerbot - that' exactly what I think about nukes: why couldn't extremely large explosions be accomplished using TNT, and where's the fallout in Arizona???

All these people claiming they've worked assembling nuclear bombs are either lying or never saw them exploded, I tend to think that they are actually disinfo provacateurs whose motive it is to keep this subject as contained as possible.


reply posted on 26-12-2008 @ 09:37 PM by pteridine
reply to post by zerbot565



Nazi Germany was far behind the US in the development of the atomic bomb but that was not known at the time. It didn’t have the resources or the people to build an atomic bomb.
The bomb was developed in the US by physicists from the Allied countries and from the Axis powers.
Trinity was definitely not chemical explosives; gamma rays are not emitted by chemical explosives.


[edit on 12/26/2008 by pteridine]


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 10:55 AM by footfall
reply to post by violenttorrent



um excuse me..... are you retarded? that is the dumbest thing i've ever heard in my life
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 9 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 14 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 13 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 10 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 3 days ago with 5 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 2 days ago with 5 member flags