Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
reply to post by robwerden
Ok i should point out before i begin this post that i am an atheist.
You would think i would agree with this post and yet i have one blazingly large issue with it. You provide little argument for why we should abolish
religion. That is my problem with this post, so i won't be flagging or starring it.
That's the point I see no reason for religion, so how can I argue. Being an atheist you apparently see no reason for it either if I may put words in
your mouth.
All im saying is, for those who are tired of religion driving the worlds leaders and being integrated into foreign policy, you no longer have only so
many options as you did before. You have the right to voice your opinion by not saying anything at all, and simply separating your self from those who
push religion. The difference in my method and the method of "if you have not got something nice to say don't say anything at all" is I suggest you
tell the person "because of your views on religion, I can not be around you". You have not said anything directly about their religion, you have not
told them to drop religion, you have simply told them that you don't want it. If they are interested in being with you, then they will leave religion
out of the conversation with you. The abolishment happens by default because it is no longer spoken of. This effect takes religion out of the national
conversation and puts it in the persons heart and mind and not in your face and every ones face.
If the person feels so strongly about religion they refuse to not talk about it, then you are no longer associated with them and they are left to only
those who seek alike conversation. The problem they will run into in the long run is the inability to convert, and the political correctness of
religion being spoken about in politics and school etc becomes taboo which is inline with the Constitution and the rule of seperation of church and
state.
I was shocked that during the republican primaries religion played such a huge role as to permit the questioning of the candidates in aspects such as
Mitt Romneys Morman religion and who did not subscribe to evolution. These things encourage a religious test of leadership, which I feel is a huge
problem.