World War III breakdown map!

India will never go against Russia although in recent time it has this inclination towards the US

mate your map and analysis are complete toss

for some reason you cant differentiate between the UK, England and Scotland, England is NATO yet scotland is a pro western non combatant whatever

what credibility does that lend you when commenting on a political/geographical carve up of the globe for ww3?

You also forgot to colour in Uruguay as being eastern leaning, although tbh I have no idea on what basis you have decided these countries would be east leaning, maybe they bought a mig in 1972 or something, or they import a lot of vodka maybe? I dunno.

Also I'm not sure why you would say places like Egypt and Jordan have people who hate the west, have you ever been?
I have, and you couldn't be further from the truth, I have been in people's houses in Cairo where they slept on the dirty floor, no real possessions, and they couldn't do enough for you, they would give you their last drop of tea.

I cant even be bothered looking over the rest of your map to pull out the other crap that's in it.

I think that Japan will be helping the US if china is in the war

Revelaed Map from 1941 reveals future - The NWO

This map was discovered by Helen Somers in a window in Philadelphia during World War II. It was completed in October 1941, before Pearl Harbor, was printed in bright colors by a cartographer named Maurice Gomberg in Philadelphia in 1942, and was displayed in his store window. Helen Somers immediately recognized the significance of the map and purchased several. At least a few original copies are still in existence, including one in the Library of Congress in Washington, DC.

The original source of the plan that is described in detail on the map is not given. However, an examination of numerous documents of the period relating to the new world order indicate that the source must have been individuals related to the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and/or the U.S. State Department.

The bottom of the map contains a detailed explanation of the U.S. policy for the New World Order. Some of the points of this policy are as follows:

A new world order for permanent peace and freedom will be established at the end of the War.

The U.S.A. must, altruistically, assume the leadership of the newly established world order.

The U.S.A., Britain, and the U.S.S.R. will undertake to guarantee peace to the nations, which will be permanently disarmed and demilitarized.

The U.S.A. will become invincible as a military, naval, and air power.

The U.S.S.R. will acquire the republics of Eastern Europe after the War.

There will be a demilitarized, federated United States of Europe.

Canada, Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean islands will be incorporated into the United States of America.

The land of the ancient Hebrews, known as Palestine and Trans-Jordan, will be united as a demilitarized republic called Hebrewland.

All natural resources will be nationalized and distributed to all nations.

Banking, investments, railroads, and power plants will be nationalized everywhere.

A world common monetary system will be established.

The unified "Supreme War Council of the United Nations" will be reorganized and transformed into a "Supreme Military and Economic Council" to assist in reconstruction and to enforce world peace.

The dimensions: of the map are nearly 36 inches by 25 inches.

forum.prisonplanet.com...

strangemaps.wordpress.com...


[edit on 15-6-2010 by kindred]

reply to post by TheRepublic


I think it's quite accurate and I agree with your assessment of there being two sides. However I wonder where Australia really sits on this issue. There is little benefit from us taking either side. But if we were, we're geographically and economically closer to the eastern side.

And diplomatically and militarily closer to the West. It would be a tough choice.

reply to post by TheRepublic


You obviously aren't very good with geopolitics.

Sweden, Finland, Austria and Republic of Ireland aren't allowed to get involved inconflict or pick sides unless they are attacked, they are officially neutral. And you missed the Balkans for joining with the west beause they are part of NATO, unless the West strikes first.

Brazil is more of a moderator, same with Bolivia. The only way they would be involved in conflict is if your brought the conflict to them.

Overall the map is relatively correct, you just made some errors.

I see that this is an old thread, and even the OP might think that his analysis was a little out of date.

My own main query would be the assumption that Russia and China can be expected to be on the same side. I don't think this can be taken for granted at all, which complicates the whole question (especially in S.W Asia), and makes it all thoroughly unpredictable.

Belarus ?? You completely forgot about even though you mentioned them in the map. They would probably be with Russia