Pentagon attack victim April Gallop interviewed by CIT

posted by Swampfox46_1999

Lets see, why would she lie...hmmmm......

Any sign of jet fuel out here? No? This was one of the first photos of the Exit Hole through the C-Ring back wall into the A&E Drive. Yes that looks like easily burnable building debris piled there doesn't it? Where is the slightest indication of jet fuel, since the newest version change to the cause of the Exit Hole was a cone of energy from the explosive jet fuel inside? What a bunch of hogwash and cow flops.



What exactly is April's LIE? Were she and little Elijah burned over 80% of their bodies and are they hiding those burns from us? Evidence please? Were they both actually shredded into litttle spaghetti-like strips of meat by the alleged shredded 90 ton 535 mph aluminum aircraft, and a mystery doctor sewed them back together again into 6 million dollar cyborgs? Evidence please. If April wasn't burned by non-existent jet fuel and if April wasn't cut to pieces by non-existent shredded aircraft aluminum, then why should April lie as ordered and report such non-existent evidence? Wouldn't you prefer that witnesses tell the truth? No?



Any sign of burning jet fuel out here on the lawn? No? How did alleged jet fuel in the wing and belly tanks not splash back out on the lawn? How could a 90 ton aircraft crash right there against the wall and leave behind no evidence of an aircraft? Impossible? Of course it is.



Any jet fuel on the lawn here? That is light pole #5 in the foreground and this is the alleged flight path straight ahead. How would the wing and belly tanks filled with fuel and allegedly impacting that wall at an official 535 mph not splash lots of jet fuel back on the lawn? Is it because no aircraft impacted the Pentagon just like April Gallop claims?



Original Dary Donley photo

How did those polyethylene (plastic) cable spools directly in the path of the alleged 90 ton 535 mph aircraft escape melting in all that alleged jet fuel?



Apparently April Gallop was telling the truth when she said NO JET FUEL and NO SIGN OF AN AIRCRAFT anywhere, wasn't she? There is no sign of jet fuel anywhere is there? Those plastic cable spools look like they never saw any heat at all, don't they? And they were right in the center of that alleged initial high explosive impact fireball weren't they?



NO JET FUEL and NO SIGN OF AN AIRCRAFT at the Pentagon explosion area, because the aircraft was really Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo and could not possibly have impacted the Pentagon along that official flight damage path and April Gallop was telling the truth and April is still telling the truth. Correct?




[edit on 12/26/08 by SPreston]

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

Maybe shes looking for fame and fortune...who knows? But plenty of people directly contradict her statement, people that had nothing to gain or lose by telling the truth.

No! You are wrong! They all had something to gain like ‘MONEY’ and PROMOTIONS!

Please show who had nothing to gain with proof and sources?
Who are these people who “directly” contradict her statement that (had nothing to gain or lose)? This ought to be a good one!
Please show they had nothing to lose?
Please show they had nothing to gain?

I have asked you to answer a couple of questions, and “you” flat out refuse to, as usual!
You jump right in on this thread and told a ball face lie! Then you have the audacity to respond to me with this!

Why don’t you go find out and post the facts!

Nope, I am challenging you to go against what you believe and look for yourself. But I am betting you won’t, because you cannot handle the truth.

Here is a fact for you, you can not back up your claims as usual, you jump in on this topic spewing nothing but lies when you where ask to back up your ridiculous claims then you have the nerve to ridicule me, making statements such as I cant handle the truth!

If you have any proof that April Gallop is lying then why don’t you demonstrate with proof and site your sources. Until then don’t bother posting to me again, you have a nice day.

In an interview on CNN...

GALLOP: Again, it wasn't anything expected. I was just going to turn on the computer to do a letter. And I never got to do that. As soon as I touched the computer, boom, and I actually thought it was a bomb. And to leave out graphic details, you know, all of a sudden, due to the impact of the plane, we were blown away from the location we were at and covered under four floors of debris, walls, office equipment, et cetera.

Due to the impact of the plane.......

transcripts.cnn.com...

In the Washington Post...

When Elisha cries these days the same way he did when he was trapped under the debris, it all comes back. If she drives past an airport and smells jet fuel, it all comes back. She hears her injured co-workers calling for help. She sees the shards of metal, the broken furniture and shattered lights jutting dangerously every which way. It feels . . . so real.

Smells jet fuel, it all comes back???? Shards of metal??? Wait, I thought she didnt see/smell any jet fuel??????

www.washingtonpost.com...

Anti-illegal immigration activist April....

April Dawn Gallop, a former Army administrative specialist who uses a cane because of injuries she received in the Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the Pentagon, said she never thought about immigration and terrorism until that day.

After the attack, she began attending anti-immigration rallies and congressional hearings, where she often ran into members of the coalition. Then last year, as soon as day laborers began gathering at a 7-Eleven less than a mile from her Woodbridge apartment, Gallop contacted members.

"I . . . said I can't believe what's going on," said Gallop, 33, who is trying to get disability benefits from the military

Gee, according to the PC crowd thats flat out bigotry on her part....

www.washingtonpost.com...

Appearantly she isnt sure what she thinks. Although, according to her original story, there most definitely was an airliner at the Pentagon. My next question would be, is it her lawyer or her that is trying to pass her off as a retired "officer"???? Her last rank was Specialist (E-4) in other words she was enlisted...and not the high and mighty officer type claimed by a few on this thread.

April Gallop … got a classified tour of the building introducing her to its defenses, and she was told it was the best defended and safest building in the world

Yep, every peon E-4 that shows up for duty at the Pentagon gets a classified tour. Although I will admit its not an actual quote from her, but it is listed in a few dozen or so stories about her.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

GALLOP: Again, it wasn't anything expected. I was just going to turn on the computer to do a letter. And I never got to do that. As soon as I touched the computer, boom, and I actually thought it was a bomb. And to leave out graphic details, you know, all of a sudden, due to the impact of the plane, we were blown away from the location we were at and covered under four floors of debris, walls, office equipment, et cetera.

Due to the impact of the plane.......

I agree she did say that however, I am sure when April Gallop crawled out the debris she had to ask what happened, and she (was told) it was an airplane that hit the building.
That is what she is referring to in her statement. As far as April Gallop saying no airplane hit the pentagon that is her “opinion”. She did “not” say HEY YALL, I GOT PROOF!

You are looking for “ANYTHING” to discredit this poor woman now you have turned to twisted spin to “try” to discredit her.

reply to post by cashlink


There is no spin to it, they are her own words. Her own lawsuit claims that the failed to evacuate the Pentagon even they knew there was a plane coming in...and then she tries to claim there was no plane??? Even you should be smelling the BS.

And if there was no plane, then why would her smelling jet fuel bring it all back to her? Right now I am on about page 20 of a search on her, and the more I look the smellier her story gets.

Then again at second glance, it appears that once again, you are not following the whole thread.

[edit on 26-12-2008 by Swampfox46_1999]

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

Please! It is not up to “you” to decide her court case! That is up to the courts to decide! Until then you are grabbing straws hoping to get people to believe in your ridiculous nonsense!

reply to post by cashlink


That is the first thing you got right, the courts get to decide her case. That does not stop me from pointing out the glaring contradictions in her "story". She does not believe a plane hit the Pentagon, and yet, is suing because they didnt evacuate when they knew a plane was coming in..........

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
She does not believe a plane hit the Pentagon, and yet, is suing because they didnt evacuate when they knew a plane was coming in..........

That's not really a contradiction.

She can't really sue on her personal belief, and she didn't write the 'official story', so what would you do?

If I get injured, and the governments saying it's because a plane crashed, but I believe a plane didn't crash, I'm still going to sue based on the governments official explanation as to how I got injured, not my own 'belief'. Because my own belief is not going to get me compensated by those that caused my injury, is it?

Sorry but your argument is just another very weak attempt to discredit solid evidence. It's not a contradiction it's common sense, something the de-bunkers continually prove they don't have.

reply to post by Swampfox46_1999

Now you sound like Nancy Grace! Convicting people before they have been tried!
I do not know where you live, but I am an American citizen, and all people in this Country are innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.
Ya, Nancy Grace likes to point fingers too! That why I cant stand her TV show.

posted by Swampfox46_1999
She does not believe a plane hit the Pentagon, and yet, is suing because they didnt evacuate when they knew a plane was coming in..........

posted by ANOK
That's not really a contradiction.

She can't really sue on her personal belief, and she didn't write the 'official story', so what would you do?

If I get injured, and the governments saying it's because a plane crashed, but I believe a plane didn't crash, I'm still going to sue based on the governments official explanation as to how I got injured, not my own 'belief'. Because my own belief is not going to get me compensated by those that caused my injury, is it?

Sorry but your argument is just another very weak attempt to discredit solid evidence. It's not a contradiction it's common sense, something the de-bunkers continually prove they don't have.

Exactly. In fact that is what we have been targeting for years; the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY and the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY because that is what the government has been presenting to the world as the OFFICIAL TRUTH for the past 7+ years. Of course the government has been forced to 'adjust' the OFFICIAL STORY as the numerous lies get exposed to the light of truth. The duh-bunkers display no common sense at all.



April Gallop too in her lawsuit must target the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY and a jury must decide why security was altered that day only and a baby allowed into a secure area instead of the daycare center. The jury must decide why her supervisor was really absent and why the supervisor or somebody ordered security relaxed. The jury must decide why no warnings were given and why no evacuation of the Pentagon. The White House was evacuated. Perhaps the jury will decide why so many lies were changed again and again and why there was no evidence of jet fuel in so many places where there should have been jet fuel if the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY was true.



Perhaps the jury will grant protective status to the other personnel who also survived without burns in the E-Ring office area near the place of impact, and they can support April's testimony with more details of their own. Perhaps the jury will demand to know why April and Elijah were not burned up if a jet aircraft was supposed to have crashed at 535 mph right next to them.

My oh my; I see why the government loyalists are so frightened of April Gallop and a jury trial exposing the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY to public scrutiny.

reply to post by ANOK


Except, she doesnt really have any solid evidence, other than no one said leave the building. Which, quite frankly, would have been the dumbest thing to do. One would think someone in the military, like April, would realize that during an air raid, you DONT go outside, you seek shelter. Having a few thousand people running around would have just increased the body count.

Originally posted by SPreston


Were they both actually shredded into litttle spaghetti-like strips of meat by the alleged shredded 90 ton 535 mph aluminum aircraft,

Why weren't they shredded by the explosive blast, or had their internal organs ruptured by sitting so close to a blast large enough to defeat a wall that had recently been reinforced to resist the blast that you claim?

Originally posted by pinch
if April doesn't believe a plane hit the building, did she sue and accept a settlement from the airlines and security companies? Was it the temptation of easy, free money? If a plane never hit the building, why did she accept that settlement?

Kinda kills her credibility in other areas, doesn't it.
Fact is that many people around the city saw the plane hit the building.
Ask any of the cabbies who were on duty that day.
(I did). They'll tell ya some stories - all include an airplane.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and sometimes an airplane is just an airplane.

I would just like to say that if this had been a missile, April would have vanished instantly. Wouldn´t you agree?
And yes, she said A PLANE, and yes she said JET FUEL!!
That can´t be twisted in any way, those are her words!!

reply to post by Seymour Butz


Exactly

We could be excused for concluding that the bulk of the force that destroyed the outer wall was applied from the outside of the building, not the inside as would be expected with planted explosives.

I'm not about to attack April as I believe she should be entitled to reasonable compensation, having been injured in her workplace during working hours. It depends on how much she's expecting to receive when determining what's the difference between a reasonable figure and greed. A class action by all those who suffered injuries in that particular event would be more likely to succeed if they can prove that any action or inaction by those in charge contributed to their suffering.

We do need more such legal action to have any hope of getting supposedly hidden evidence revealed. I say supposedly because there's really nothing to suggest it even exists as yet - it's just a hope we cling to.

Originally posted by Seymour Butz

Originally posted by SPreston


Were they both actually shredded into litttle spaghetti-like strips of meat by the alleged shredded 90 ton 535 mph aluminum aircraft,

Why weren't they shredded by the explosive blast, or had their internal organs ruptured by sitting so close to a blast large enough to defeat a wall that had recently been reinforced to resist the blast that you claim?

Bump for SPreston.

I'd really like to see an explanation how she could survive such a blast from the construction trailer.

posted by Seymour Butz

Bump for SPreston.

I'd really like to see an explanation how she could survive such a blast from the construction trailer.

Quite simple. As you can see from YOUR evidence; the parking lot videos and still frames, the explosive force is directed upwards and not inwards. Hollywood special effects explosions are really not very dangerous and mostly for show. Also it is apparent the center of that alleged explosion is out away from the wall a good bit. Located in the construction trailers and further away from April and little Elijah. But the polyethelene (plastic) cable spools which were next to the construction trailers, and easily melted, were not damaged by heat at all were they? Right in the center of all that white heat and the following much cooler heat, and they were untouched. Amazing. Another 9-11 miracle among hundreds?



Simultaneously, the 9-11 perps could have blown several Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kits to penetrate the wall, and it would have been these explosive charges which blew April across the room and covered her and Elijah with building debris. Supposedly these military shaped charges contain no jet fuel and no airplane parts; which might explain why April Gallop saw NO JET FUEL and NO AIRCRAFT DEBRIS inside her E-Ring office area.

Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kits

A half hour or so later, when they blew the roof, and after they had covered the internal area with jet fuel and a few aircraft pieces, they could have exploded a few more high explosives. This might explain why the building kept burning for days and why the autos outside seemed to be out and then burning fiercely hours later. It might explain the reasons for the evacuations of the area under the guise of more air attacks.



[edit on 12/29/08 by SPreston]

Originally posted by SPreston

1-Hollywood special effects explosions are really not very dangerous and mostly for show. Also it is apparent the center of that alleged explosion is out away from the wall a good bit. Located in the construction trailers and further away from April and little Elijah.

2-Simultaneously, the 9-11 perps could have blown several Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kits to penetrate the wall, and it would have been these explosive charges which blew April across the room and covered her and Elijah with building debris.

1-So the construction trailers only contained the "show" explosives then. Ok.

2- so they were blown across the room by wall breaching charges. Why weren't they killed by that then?

posted by SPreston
2-Simultaneously, the 9-11 perps could have blown several Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kits to penetrate the wall, and it would have been these explosive charges which blew April across the room and covered her and Elijah with building debris.

posted by Seymour Butz
1-So the construction trailers only contained the "show" explosives then. Ok.

2- so they were blown across the room by wall breaching charges. Why weren't they killed by that then?

If you had bothered to follow the link and watch the shaped charge video, you would have seen the blast radius is not very big, and April and Elijah were 35-45 feet from the blast(s) with perhaps one or more concrete columns between them and the blast(s). They appear to have used a shaped charge on the Exit Hole wall, and those same shaped charges would have worked on the outer wall.

Of course this is only guesswork as to exactly what explosives the 9-11 perpetrators used on the Pentagon. We only know for sure that the actual aircraft flew Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo and could not possibly have taken out the light poles nor created the damage path through the Pentagon.

We also know for a fact that April and little Elijah were NOT burned up by jet fuel, nor do they appear to be burned at all. We also know that April stated that she saw NO JET FUEL and NO AIRCRAFT PARTS inside the E-Ring where her office was located. We also know for a fact there is NO sign of jet fuel outside the Exit Hole.