April Gallop … got a classified tour of the building introducing her to its defenses, and she was told it was the best defended and safest building in the world

Yep, every peon E-4 that shows up for duty at the Pentagon gets a classified tour. Although I will admit its not an actual quote from her, but it is listed in a few dozen or so stories about her.

Originally posted by Swampfox46_1999
She does not believe a plane hit the Pentagon, and yet, is suing because they didnt evacuate when they knew a plane was coming in..........

That's not really a contradiction.

She can't really sue on her personal belief, and she didn't write the 'official story', so what would you do?

If I get injured, and the governments saying it's because a plane crashed, but I believe a plane didn't crash, I'm still going to sue based on the governments official explanation as to how I got injured, not my own 'belief'. Because my own belief is not going to get me compensated by those that caused my injury, is it?

Sorry but your argument is just another very weak attempt to discredit solid evidence. It's not a contradiction it's common sense, something the de-bunkers continually prove they don't have.

posted by Swampfox46_1999
She does not believe a plane hit the Pentagon, and yet, is suing because they didnt evacuate when they knew a plane was coming in..........

posted by ANOK
That's not really a contradiction.

She can't really sue on her personal belief, and she didn't write the 'official story', so what would you do?

If I get injured, and the governments saying it's because a plane crashed, but I believe a plane didn't crash, I'm still going to sue based on the governments official explanation as to how I got injured, not my own 'belief'. Because my own belief is not going to get me compensated by those that caused my injury, is it?

Sorry but your argument is just another very weak attempt to discredit solid evidence. It's not a contradiction it's common sense, something the de-bunkers continually prove they don't have.

Exactly. In fact that is what we have been targeting for years; the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY and the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY because that is what the government has been presenting to the world as the OFFICIAL TRUTH for the past 7+ years. Of course the government has been forced to 'adjust' the OFFICIAL STORY as the numerous lies get exposed to the light of truth. The duh-bunkers display no common sense at all.



April Gallop too in her lawsuit must target the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY and a jury must decide why security was altered that day only and a baby allowed into a secure area instead of the daycare center. The jury must decide why her supervisor was really absent and why the supervisor or somebody ordered security relaxed. The jury must decide why no warnings were given and why no evacuation of the Pentagon. The White House was evacuated. Perhaps the jury will decide why so many lies were changed again and again and why there was no evidence of jet fuel in so many places where there should have been jet fuel if the Pentagon OFFICIAL STORY was true.



Perhaps the jury will grant protective status to the other personnel who also survived without burns in the E-Ring office area near the place of impact, and they can support April's testimony with more details of their own. Perhaps the jury will demand to know why April and Elijah were not burned up if a jet aircraft was supposed to have crashed at 535 mph right next to them.

My oh my; I see why the government loyalists are so frightened of April Gallop and a jury trial exposing the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY to public scrutiny.

Originally posted by SPreston


Were they both actually shredded into litttle spaghetti-like strips of meat by the alleged shredded 90 ton 535 mph aluminum aircraft,

Why weren't they shredded by the explosive blast, or had their internal organs ruptured by sitting so close to a blast large enough to defeat a wall that had recently been reinforced to resist the blast that you claim?

Originally posted by pinch
if April doesn't believe a plane hit the building, did she sue and accept a settlement from the airlines and security companies? Was it the temptation of easy, free money? If a plane never hit the building, why did she accept that settlement?

Kinda kills her credibility in other areas, doesn't it.
Fact is that many people around the city saw the plane hit the building.
Ask any of the cabbies who were on duty that day.
(I did). They'll tell ya some stories - all include an airplane.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and sometimes an airplane is just an airplane.

I would just like to say that if this had been a missile, April would have vanished instantly. Wouldn´t you agree?
And yes, she said A PLANE, and yes she said JET FUEL!!
That can´t be twisted in any way, those are her words!!

Originally posted by Seymour Butz

Originally posted by SPreston


Were they both actually shredded into litttle spaghetti-like strips of meat by the alleged shredded 90 ton 535 mph aluminum aircraft,

Why weren't they shredded by the explosive blast, or had their internal organs ruptured by sitting so close to a blast large enough to defeat a wall that had recently been reinforced to resist the blast that you claim?

Bump for SPreston.

I'd really like to see an explanation how she could survive such a blast from the construction trailer.

Originally posted by SPreston

1-Hollywood special effects explosions are really not very dangerous and mostly for show. Also it is apparent the center of that alleged explosion is out away from the wall a good bit. Located in the construction trailers and further away from April and little Elijah.

2-Simultaneously, the 9-11 perps could have blown several Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kits to penetrate the wall, and it would have been these explosive charges which blew April across the room and covered her and Elijah with building debris.

1-So the construction trailers only contained the "show" explosives then. Ok.

2- so they were blown across the room by wall breaching charges. Why weren't they killed by that then?

posted by SPreston
2-Simultaneously, the 9-11 perps could have blown several Military Rapid Wall Breaching Kits to penetrate the wall, and it would have been these explosive charges which blew April across the room and covered her and Elijah with building debris.

posted by Seymour Butz
1-So the construction trailers only contained the "show" explosives then. Ok.

2- so they were blown across the room by wall breaching charges. Why weren't they killed by that then?

If you had bothered to follow the link and watch the shaped charge video, you would have seen the blast radius is not very big, and April and Elijah were 35-45 feet from the blast(s) with perhaps one or more concrete columns between them and the blast(s). They appear to have used a shaped charge on the Exit Hole wall, and those same shaped charges would have worked on the outer wall.

Of course this is only guesswork as to exactly what explosives the 9-11 perpetrators used on the Pentagon. We only know for sure that the actual aircraft flew Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo and could not possibly have taken out the light poles nor created the damage path through the Pentagon.

We also know for a fact that April and little Elijah were NOT burned up by jet fuel, nor do they appear to be burned at all. We also know that April stated that she saw NO JET FUEL and NO AIRCRAFT PARTS inside the E-Ring where her office was located. We also know for a fact there is NO sign of jet fuel outside the Exit Hole.