ATS' Motto, Deny Ignorance, , page 2


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 34 times


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:21 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by AlmostPossible



That does not change the situation at all. Since your post is NOT one that points to a factual news article, my argument holds, and you know it.



reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:28 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by intrepid





ATS members don't like to be played the fool. Congrats, I think you qualify for the 2008 Darwin awards


Thanks Intrepid, for speaking up. I always suspect posts that only have a few points and a current date of registry. It looks like this is another one of those.


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:33 PM by Allred5923
reply to post by AlmostPossible



Change your screen name to "Blow-Hard"!!! 'Cause you truly blow!!

When one seeks the answers to unanswerable questions, they are more often unknowingly drawn into an additional pack of lies which has provided to them the so very sought after explanation.


I will have to take it that you are a reader, of sorts? And why, pray-tell, do you read the books of your choice? Insight, Appropriations to personal thoughts? Or, could it be, "You are possibly seeking truths through the medias of books and news reports of the like?
With out the adventure of the search, there is no true knowledge in the thought, and by the way, that's why I am here on these forums. I don't take anything for face value, but when there are particular topics of discussion, I tend to lean towards the best research I have at my beck and call, "WWW." Baby!!! If it is outlandish and rather "Flighty" for explanation, I don't ignore it, I just wait to see what becomes of it. You would be truly amazed at some of the "Minds" we have here, and "Yes" they are very learned peoples with lives as well, go figure.
SO , take the above statement, put it in your C***K Pipe and smoke it!
"We are only endeavouring on the fringes of science and our realities as a whole."

Since the question was unanswerable to begin with, they willfully secure their minds with the latter in order to feel more comfortable/knowledgeable instead of admitting to themselves that a question may indeed be unanswerable by our current understanding.


You are truly a "Double talker" , you , with your very first post did exactly what we are doing here, "Denying Ignorance" to the utmost of our abilities at current, "question may indeed be unanswerable by our current understanding."
Just keep your opinions to yourself, get check by the Dr. for that "Foot-in-mouth Disease" and get on with your trolling that I know you will be very good at. You don't have the "Moxy" for some of the guy's and gals here at the ATS forums.

Move on and question your own researches with out offending the others that have been here for some time!!


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:33 PM by TheFreeBird
reply to post by ProfEmeritus



You may need to wait, it will take some time for the esteemed poster to read up on how Chomsky handles being proved wrong.

The fact is, many of us check facts a lot closer than MSM, or most any other group. Because there are so many eyes on the posts, there are a lot of people with varied backgrounds looking very closely at things, and then poking holes when needed. With so many fact checkers, it doesn't take long for someone with more than 4 brain cells to sort the wheat from the chaff.

Like the Barksdale Incident, when we are right, and show it, then even the MSM picks up on it. And they must be reading it here to have jumped on it like they did, using the same proof one of our fellow members used.

When you think about it, if just one percent of the dirt we dig up proves to have a basis, then ATS is a very good public servant.


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:43 PM by Allred5923
reply to post by DudeontheTube



Wow look at all the clones on the defensive!


"Up Yours!!, I am an independent contractor of my own thoughts, seems as if you had a say in something, then you muddled it with some appeasing jargon that left you feel good." Too Bad!!

As far as I can tell, "It didn't work for you."
Not here anyways.....


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:48 PM by DudeontheTube
reply to post by Allred5923



Well you independently contracted with the right crowd then didn't you?


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:51 PM by DudeontheTube
reply to post by MemoryShock



I apologize for finding a great amount of irony in this thread.


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:52 PM by Mr Mxyztplk
reply to post by DudeontheTube



Did you create this account just to come on and defend the OP?

This after one of the mods accusing the OP of having been banned and coming back just to through a hissy fit



reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:53 PM by MemoryShock
reply to post by DudeontheTube



You use the word "irony" as if you understand it...indeed, I found "irony" in the OP's premise...


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:55 PM by DudeontheTube
Originally posted by MemoryShock
reply to
post by DudeontheTube



You use the word "irony" as if you understand it...indeed, I found "irony" in the OP's premise...


The irony is in the great defense for the truthfulness of the posts on this website.


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:56 PM by Mr Mxyztplk
reply to post by DudeontheTube



Why would you join a site just to bash it? is your cable out or something?


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 08:59 PM by DudeontheTube
Originally posted by Mr Mxyztplk
reply to
post by DudeontheTube



Why would you join a site just to bash it? is your cable out or something?


Actually I joined because this post is right and I've heard enough. You are all clearly willing to take ignorance to the grave.


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 09:00 PM by Allred5923
Originally posted by DudeontheTube
reply to
post by Allred5923



Well you independently contracted with the right crowd then didn't you?


"Damn Straight!!" And with my "OWN" analogies of every topic being discussed, even this bogus thread is getting my uninterrupted attention, because I am a individual of "Out Of The Box Thinkers" who actually takes both sides into consideration, but find it really hard to make a "Valid" point to a couple of individuals that thinks, or , with hope "Thought" they knew it all? Sound like anyone you know DUDE? Interesting name , back in the day it was used as other topics of recognition,Dude is recorded as early as 1877 in the words of those who were not impressed. Which is exactly where I am at with my way of thinking of this communication thus far!!


reply posted on 21-12-2008 @ 09:02 PM by scooterstrats
reply to post by DudeontheTube

Well then, it's ironic that you have to defend your own posts "on this website". As any post here is bogus... according to you..... wow, so much irony I need boots to wade here...
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags