Why do Masons call themselves "Worshipful Master"?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 12:50 AM by lazy1981
reply to post by network dude



I have heard that B'nai B'rith (an all Jewish lodge) was Masonic in nature. Is this so? Is it even Masonic? Or just prapagnda? I have always read that Masonry was all inclusive and bars no one.


reply posted on 24-12-2008 @ 02:50 AM by RuneSpider
reply to post by lazy1981



In the mid-1800's, a group of Jewish-German immigrants sought to find fraternity and fellowship with others of similar background. Although many of these men felt comfortable joining groups such as the Masons and Odd Fellows, others wanted a more ethnic-religious centered group and thus in 1844, the Jewish fraternal order of B'nai B'rith was formed, seeking to reconcile Judaism with American society through voluntary association.


www.masonicinfo.com...


Originally posted by DoctorDoom
Wow. I' amazed at the amount of Masons posting on this website

It's like I've been approached by a gang of worshippers.



Ten Masons have replied to you in a thread that you directed towards them specifically. Out of the thousand or so odd members of ATS.

The way you complain about it, it's almost like you're a troll or something.


reply posted on 25-12-2008 @ 04:22 PM by lazy1981
reply to post by RuneSpider



Thanks for the info. I was just wondering, someone said that there are no exclusive lodges and who better to here the truth then from the horses mouth. The internet will give you just about any hit, pro or con.



reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 04:42 PM by civilized mammal
Originally posted by doctordoom
The term "worshipful master" has a Jonestown ring to it to me.

Let's take a look at the word "worshipful".


The American Heritage Dictionary defines worship as "the reverent love and allegiance accorded a deity, idol, or sacred object." The Greek words for worship combine the ideas of "falling down before," "paying homage to," and "serving." From these definitions it is obvious that worship involves recognition of worth in God, and the offering of our honor, praise, and adoration to the One who is altogether worthy.

www.newtestamentchurch.org...

The word worship is reserved for a deity, idol or sacred object.
What makes a Mason a deity?
It's rather quite silly if you ask me.

So, I guess my question is, do you actually worship the "Worshipful Master" if you are a lower Mason?

Also, is there a higher level than the "Worshipful Master"?

Check out a Google search of the term "worshipful"

[edit on 20-12-2008 by doctordoom]

Usually people with overly needy egos will require some measure of self-glorification. Often this becomes apparent in the assumption of titles. Sure it's old English yet the meaning is constant and clear to those assuming the title. They derive pleasure and satisfaction, maybe even a sense of accomplishment from it. Essentially, if you couldn't earn an academic title you can still call yourself "worshipful master." Whether this is contravening and insulting to God's law is of course of no great importance for some.
We've seen the parade of self styled Generallissimo's, Emperors of the Sun, Fuhrer, 'Father' Stalin, Protectors of the Realm, God's Vicar on Earth, Prophets and so forth. His Earthly Worship the Prince of Wales is pretty hilarious too!


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 04:55 PM by KYCH/32KCCH
reply to post by civilized mammal



civilized mammal: "hilarious too! "... What I find is hilarious is that people worry about the "title" a group uses and ignoring the reason they use it.
Even more hilarious is the assumption that anyone who chose to be Master of a Lodge " couldn't earn an academic title" ....
This really is a pathetic topic


reply posted on 7-1-2009 @ 06:46 PM by LowLevelMason
reply to post by civilized mammal





You seriously don't think any actual WM calls himself worshipful do you? Please. I've never seen in all my years.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 03:45 AM by RuneSpider
reply to post by civilized mammal




They derive pleasure and satisfaction, maybe even a sense of accomplishment from it. Essentially, if you couldn't earn an academic title you can still call yourself "worshipful master."

Interesting. I usually have the same opinion who claim to understand something they don't spend a day research, or fringe scientists pushing a new cure for cancer.



reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 12:29 PM by JoshNorton
Originally posted by civilized mammal
Essentially, if you couldn't earn an academic title you can still call yourself "worshipful master."
The Senior Warden of my lodge, who will be Worshipful Master next year, holds a PhD in Physics. And after his one year term is up, he won't be an officer of the lodge any more. So you go from being top dog to being just another brother after your year in office has been served. Doesn't really seem like something glory-seekers would strive for. The number of past-masters will always eclipse the guy currently in the seat, and the rest of the brethren who voted him there shouldn't be ignored either.

But I suppose the original poster didn't have access to the Oxford English Dictionary...
worshipful, a. (n., adv.)
  1. Of things: Notable or outstanding in respect of some (good) quality or property; distinguished, imposing; reputable, honourable. Now arch.
  2. Of persons: Distinguished in respect of character or rank; entitled to honour or respect on this account. Now arch.
  3. a. As an honorific title for persons or bodies of distinguished rank or importance: formerly used very widely, but now restricted to the livery companies and freemasons' lodges and their masters. right worshipful is applied to mayors.
    b. Used in forms of address, as worshipful sir, (right) worshipful master, etc.
    c. absol. (chiefly pl.) or as n. In later use spec. a magistrate.
  4. Showing or bringing honour or distinction to a person; reputable or honourable for one. Obs.
  5. Showing or bringing honour or distinction to a person; reputable or honourable for one. Obs.
  6. Deserving or capable of being worshipped; worshipable.
So he skipped over all the other meanings and instantly latched onto the last.


[edit on 1/8/2009 by JoshNorton]


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 12:35 PM by BlueRaja
reply to post by doctordoom



It's already been explained how the context and origin of the usage was derived. If you want to assign any additional connotations, that's your prerogative, but it doesn't make your assertion any more valid.


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 07:24 PM by doctordoom
Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to
post by doctordoom



It's already been explained how the context and origin of the usage was derived. If you want to assign any additional connotations, that's your prerogative, but it doesn't make your assertion any more valid.


Well, there has been 15 posts since I posted last, all supporting the Masons.

Go figure.

Must have hit a sore spot



reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 07:29 PM by LowLevelMason
reply to post by doctordoom



Or, could it be that the truth is so overwhelmingly obvious but you don't want to accept it, so you look for other ways to explain it?




reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 07:56 PM by ForkandSpoon
Originally posted by intrepid
reply to
post by doctordoom



So you're saying that CO's and lawyers that use the term "Your Worship" are "tentacles of the Anti-Christian beast?"



That's really a redundent statement.....the "worship" has nothing to do with it man! LOL

Oh if the Anti Masons only knew just how little respect most "Worshipful Masters" have to put up with.....


reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 10:54 PM by doctordoom
Originally posted by LowLevelMason
reply to
post by doctordoom



Or, could it be that the truth is so overwhelmingly obvious but you don't want to accept it, so you look for other ways to explain it?



Then, we would have no conspiracy, now would we,
and this site would be moot.



reply posted on 8-1-2009 @ 11:38 PM by KSigMason
reply to post by doctordoom


We're just setting the record straight and informing the other members.


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 04:57 AM by RuneSpider
reply to post by doctordoom



Not really, there are many conspiracies, this site does not support itself by Masonry conspiracies alone.

However, there is a difference between conspiracies or critical thinking, and blatantly ignoring information and making insulting statements both to members of this site and people you've never met in any shape or form.


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 05:29 AM by ForkandSpoon
Originally posted by RuneSpider
reply to
post by doctordoom



Not really, there are many conspiracies, this site does not support itself by Masonry conspiracies alone.


Why come no one seems to pick on the Odd Fellows?

I mean........their Odd.

[edit on 9/1/2009 by ForkandSpoon]


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 09:47 AM by BlueRaja
reply to post by doctordoom



I'm not a Mason myself, but I do understand how terminology has to be taken into the original context and intent.


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 01:20 PM by LowLevelMason
reply to post by doctordoom



No, then we would acknowledge that everything ISN'T a conspiracy. The title "worshipful master" has nothing to do with worship, and is a title masters themselves never use to describe themselves. Facts. Not a conspiracy.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Leaked video of freemason-show.
  Posted 5 days ago with 37 member flags
The Templar Uprising
  Posted 17 days ago with 17 member flags
Jay-Z is Nicki Minaj?
  Posted 5 days ago with 11 member flags
CNBC yet another Luciferian ILLUMINATI Network ! ! !
  Posted 18 days ago with 7 member flags
The Three Ruffians
  Posted 14 days ago with 5 member flags
32nd level mason
  Posted 3 days ago with 4 member flags
The Hive Mind
  Posted 11 days ago with 2 member flags
A Transparent and Open Secretive Society devoted to Truth
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags