From the moment schizophrenia (divided mind) has taken over human genome, there has been an ongoing de-mutation of human beings.
Those who refused to submit themselves to the authority were killed, burned, exorcised, ostracized, excommunicated, marginalized or, in best case,
ignored.
Those who would agree to be slaves, were allowed to live.
The decision to be a slave switches off the ability to understand the premises of freedom and creates a wall of denial which protects one from the
truth. Truth makes slaves sick to the stomach.
In society one has rights, but no freedom.
Those who exercise freedom are considered unruly, disobedient, unaccountable, heretic, unreliable, unsuitable, anarchic (with negative meaning),
dangerous...
In "democratic" elections those who don't trust any of the offered political programs, are simply ignored, as if they never existed. Those who
don't exercise their "right to vote" don't exist. They are the "invisible", "dark" matter and what they want is never seriously considered.
They are denied.
So, how can a man who wants to be free exercise his freedom in society? Society does not allow that possibility. Any attempt to do so will result in
opposition from all those who have accepted rules which regulate rights and have discarded their own freedom.
It is not just authorities who oppose freedom, even bigger opposition comes from slaves themselves. They will often advocate ruling out free behavior,
and mostly for one simple reason: because they have renounced their own responsibility in their actions (because those actions are nor ruled by
regulations and rights) they have no other concept of responsibility but arbitrariness.
Slaves presume that freedom is arbitrariness because they have no idea of ethics. Society has discarded ethics, which is a deep personal experience
and they can never accept the fact that they are responsible for their own lack of ethics, because that would destroy the contract they have made with
the devil.
People who want to be free and responsible are in advance condemned as those who provoke violence. It is absurd, but absurdness easily survives with
those who refuse to have insight into truth.
So, in my opinion, this whole matter is not about simply finding a better scheme for a social system, it is actually caused by society and it is
indigenous to the society of any kind.
In society, which is a system of distribution of responsibility, only the corrupted ones can exist within the body of given norms. Corruption is
always handled in such a way that the corrupted are always given another chance. But those who are not corrupted are discarded and disabled by all
means.
Governments whose job is to fail (see Reinhardt, who has empirically come to such conclusion) are trusted by slaves even if they fail on a day to day
basis. Slaves always chose "peace" over "riots" and claim that government should be pardoned and given another chance. This, of course, cannot be
defended by any rational stance, but is always purported emotionally.
Whether there is such thing as emotional intelligence, read Medea or articles about mass murders in shopping malls or in school amphitheaters.
The only thing free people can do in such environment as is society is - to resist.
Resisting is not violent, reaction of society to resisting is violent.
Society is the source of violence, all rights are imposed by force.
All freedom is denied by force.
Things are very simple, and rationalizing problems is a false flag attempt to deny freedom.
Cowards will always support authorities.
(Reinhardt site
www.enterprisecorruption.com... )
[edit on 20-12-2008 by DangerDeath]