|
reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 05:12 PM by guinnessford
|
yes, i am starting to filter them out, but i dont mind asking or answering queations from them or even reading their info. the best way to know your
enemy... you know what i mean? and you hit ti right on the head, about the stance most people have. yet again another insightful bit of info from you.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 05:14 PM by MilitieTempliSalmo
|
I would advise you to go back to the island where you came from, cause you were much better there!
I would ask if you could share the island also...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 05:16 PM by guinnessford
|
YES! YES! LETS ALL GO TO MY ISLAND NOW!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 05:32 PM by guinnessford
|
cashlink, tezz, and hopefully ashamedamerican, can you tell me about the rapetriot act? oh i meant patriot act. freudian slip. and anyone else?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 06:31 PM by logician magician
|
Originally posted by pluckynoonez
reply to post by guinnessford
All you need to know is this: the terrorists hate us for our freedoms. It is now more important than ever that we imprison and torture people who are
"terrorists" to keep us safe.
Christians don't hate us for our freedom (to sin). They let God sort it out.
Muslims take it into their own hands and kill the infidels (and themselves) with bombs.
Apparently, Allah just isn't a very good admin.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-12-2008 @ 09:29 PM by cashlink
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 03:54 AM by rush969
|

 OK. Let´s try to keep an objective view and mention only known facts.
They are as follows.
Four jetliners, two from American Airlines and two from United Airlines were hijacked on Sep. 11 2001. These jetliners all crashed killing all their
ocupants. Two of them crashed in New York City one against each of the WTC towers. The third plane crashed against the Pentagon, and the fourth
crashed in fields in Shanksville Pa. This last one was as a result of the passergers getting organized and attacking the hijackers because they found
out through plane-phones what had happened at NYC and Washington and decided not to let the terrorists use them as another weapon to crash against
some building. It is believed that the target of this last plane was either the White House or the Capitol Building in D.C.
From the hijacked airplanes there were numerous phone calls, most of them made from plane-phones and a few made from cell phones. From this calls, a
lot of information was inmediately available to authorities as far as who the hijackers were. Which were their seats for instance, and from this
information authorities were able to determine the possible identities of some of the hijackers. It is believed that some of them were traveling
under different names from their real ones, but some are believed to have been using their real names.
From one of the hijacked airplanes one of the terrorists actually made an anouncement which he aparently intended to give to the passengers on an
active air traffic frequency and so traffic controllers were able to hear the terrorist saying something like: "we have several aircraft, and there
is a bomb on board, we are returning to the airport, don´t move, and do as you are told, and everything will be allright". This transmition was
actually made public after a few days of the hijackings.
There was a great amount of confussion during the hijackings and the crashes and authorities got to the point of believing there were more hijacked
flights, at a certain point the FAA ordered a TOTAL GROUND STOP. All flights that had not taken off got canceled and all flights that were in the air
were ordered to LAND AT THE NEAREST AIRPORT. Within a few hours all civilian aviation had come to a stand still and it remained grounded for several
days.
In NYC the crashes of the planes against the buildings, damaged these greatly in their structure. Both planes hit the towers at very high speed and
loaded with a lot of fuel, which created a unique situation that was not considered in the design. In spite of this the buildings didn´t topple or
fail at that instant, but the fire and the damage to them was such, that after some time, aproximately 1 hr. in one case an 2 hrs. in the other, there
was a failure in the structure of each tower in the area were the plane had hit, and the portion of the building above that area fell on the lower
portion, which was unable to support it. Due to the unique design of these towers, they collapsed after this event, the outer structure of the
buildings coming appart as the higher portion of building was falling on the lower section. As the mass falling grew, it continued to destroy the
lower part of each tower totally disintegrating it. These events, as well as the crash of the second airplane on the tower were seen live worldwide
because great coverage was taking place about the fire caused by the first plane.
During these events the crash against the Pentagon took place. That crash was an American Airlines plane. There were numerous wittnesses who were in
the vicinity and many actually identified the AA logo and paint job on the aircraft.
American and United Airlines were able to stablish which flights had been hijacked almost inmediatly working toghether with the FAA, FBI, and the
airphone companies because in many of the calls made from the planes the passengers or crew mentioned what flight they were on...
(more to come...)
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 09:48 AM by guinnessford
|
cashlink... im even more scared after seeing that. rush... cell phones work at flight elevation?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 11:13 AM by Allegory of Illumination
|
Originally posted by tezzajw
You're not going to learn or know anything. You'll be thrown in jail for not paying your ten years worth of taxes and property rates for your
island residence.
No need.... 16th amendment doesn't say anything about ANYONE being required to pay taxes.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 11:16 AM by guinnessford
|
yet another good point
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 02:10 PM by rush969
|

continues...
The plane crashes and fires at WTC towers 1 and 2 created an emergency on Manhattan the likes of which had never been seen before. An evacuation of
the WTC complex was ordered and thousands of people were able to get out of the threatened area. After the second plane hit, it was realized by most
people that an attack on the US was in progress and nobody knew what could follow. There was a lot of confusion and panic.
After aprox. 1 hr. in one case and about 2 hrs. in the other, the two towers collapsed. During this collapse of the skyscrapers, many surrounding
buildings were greatly damaged and some also collapsed. The Marriott hotel was one and WTC 7 was another. This last building was hit by large
amounts of heavy debris from one of the towers which caused a big gap to open in the lower part of it and fires broke out in several areas also. Many
firemen were lost in the collapse of the towers as they were trying to reach people trapped in them. It is estimated that almost 3000 people died at
WTC 1 and 2. WTC 7 had been evacuated by the time it also collapsed after several hours of fires in it had continued to burn without control. The
fire department, after evaluating the damage to this building and fearing that it was structurally unstable decided to draw back the teams fighting
the fires and let it continue to burn. The building actually did collapse a few hours later and the lives of those firemen were spared.
more later...
[edit on 20-12-2008 by rush969]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 03:37 PM by HaveSeen4Myself
|
Welcome back to paradise. We'd given up on you, since you were just going for a three hour tour. We'll certainly make sure that you don't leave
the country again, for your own good of course.
Oh well... this is gonna sound ridiculous but here goes.
Shortly after you left us, things got really bizarre. Slick Willie Clinton went out with a $70M bang in 1999-2000. GWB lost the ensuing election,
but we gave it to him anyway on account of his boyish good looks. He was very appreciative and got right to work on the Patriot Act, just in case our
freedoms needed protecting. What a visionary of a dude.
All of those democratic processes must have made less fortunate people jealous of our transparent and uncorrupt utopia. We knew our more perfect
union could not last forever in such an imperfect world. A deadly strain of terrorist techno-cave geeks quickly mutated into existence complete with
a plan encoded into their DNA. But not just any plan...... I'm talking about a scheme so cunning that Captain James T. Kirk would be regarded
henceforth as merely a novice strategist by reputable historians.
These weren't your typical run of the mill conspirators, is what I'm trying to say. Up until this naive point in history, terrorists were not
generally considered to be Rhodes Scholars.... nor were they considered to be all that generous. That was the genius of this new plan; to turn the
tables on the good samaritans of American politics.
Yes this plan, when carried out to perfection, would leave the United States no choice but to abolish freedom itself! The only beneficiaries in the
aftermath of this mammoth operation would appear to be the military/industrial/media complex of the USA, while the actual perpetrators would appear to
be very accomodating for evil-doers (in a deranged sort of way). How would anyone ever solve this perfect crime? MUWAHAHA!
Who would ever think to hold Islamic Extremists accountable if they stood to gain nothing? Afterall, terrorist acts are meaningless without some type
of demand or perceived purpose. The only beneficiaries would be the shady bankers and morally defunct politicians when they demolished the aging,
unprofitable, and asbestos filled WTC towers. Deftly utilizing passenger planes as if they were laser-guided bowling balls, these Islamic good
samaritans went out in an inferno of glory. The attacks would happen BEFORE the buildings were full. And the landing gear would NOT be engaged at
the time of impact. And bring the buildings straight down instead of knocking them over, which would be much easier but MUCH less perplexing. And
sell the owners of the WTC enough insurance to make them so rich as to be incriminating. And modify the planes so that they will penetrate concrete
and steel effortlessly to create more contradictions in logic. And so on and so forth .
Flash forward to the morning of 9/11..........
In a maneuver that was no doubt calculated countless times in Cessna flight simulators, these masters of physics impacted the twin towers utilizing
massive jets like surgical instruments, in just the right spot, with just enough english; to knock them STRAIGHT DOWN and pick up the unlikely spare -
WTC 7.
Not wanting to be outdone, another student aviator phenom was getting ready to strut his stuff above the D.C. skies. Having seen his old buddy Donald
Rumsfeld on CNN while getting hammered at a gentleman's mosque a day earlier, he knew that the D.O.D. had misplaced 2.3 TRILLION dollars. While
eating his last pickled egg and chugging a 40 ounce Old English, he whipped out his Rand & McNally map of the Pentagon and quickly located the
accounting department. Realizing that his angle of approach was not the most ideal, he yanked her down into a 270 degree dive and started whistling
the theme to Top Gun. Skimming microns above the freshly cut Pentalawn, he flicked his passport towards the admiring crowd as his fireball cooked
Rummy's books and penetrated three flimsy walls of the Pentacon.
Those terrorists generously, yet deceptively, gave up their lives for the apparent good of the military industrial complex. Lucky for us, FOX News
and the FBI instantly appeared on the scene and figured out the whole scam before noon and heroically prevented these henchmen from casting blame on
the wrong parties.
Yes 9/11 would have been the perfect crime, had the perps not underestimated the investigative might of US INTEL and cable news networks.
Homeland Security will need proof of your whereabouts for the last ten years (for your safety so that guilty parties can't implicate you in our
continuing terrorist investigations).
[edit on 12/20/08 by HaveSeen4Myself]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 04:54 PM by cashlink
|
reply to post by rush969
OK. Let´s try to keep an objective view and mention only known facts.
They are as follows.
I will present what the real facts are on this subject.
Please show your Proof and site your sources as I have thank you.
Four jetliners, two from American Airlines and two from United Airlines were hijacked on Sep. 11 2001. These jetliners all crashed killing all
their ocupants.
Please show Proof that these airplanes ever existed and sit your sources.
F.B.I. Counsel: No Attempt Made By F.B.I. To Formally Indentify 9/11 Plane Wreckage
Aidan Monaghan
Contained within a March 14, 2008 "DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT" with the Nevada District U.S.
Court, concerning a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by Mr. Aidan Monaghan (Case #: 2:07-cv-01614-RCJ-GWF) to order the production of Federal
Bureau of Investigation records concerning the 4 aircraft involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, Assistant U.S. Attorney Patrick A.
Rose has indicated on behalf of the FBI, that records indicating the collection and positive identification of recovered wreckage created by these
federally registered aircraft, do not exist.
Defendants motion reads in part:
"Since being served with the Summons and Amended Complaint, Federal Defendant, with assistance of its attorneys, has analyzed Plaintiff’s request
and conducted a search for responsive records. Federal Defendant has determined that there are no responsive records. The identities of the airplanes
hijacked in the September 11 attacks was never in question, and, therefore, there were no records generated “revealing the process by which wreckage
recovered by defendant, from aircraft used during the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, was positively identified by defendant . . . as
belonging to said aircraft . . .” (Amend Compl. Inj. Relief #15 at 1.)"
However, this claim is directly contradicted by public comments offered by Carol Carmody, Vice-Chairman National Transportation Safety Board and
Marion C. Blakey, Chairman National Transportation Safety Board, who both indicated in 2002 that FBI director Robert Mueller requested NTSB assistance
with 9/11 aircraft wreckage identification and that the NTSB did perform 9/11 aircraft wreckage identification analysis.
"I ... assured FBI Director Mueller that we would assist in any way we could ... he called and said, "Could you send us some people to help find the
black boxes and help identify aircraft By FAA documents identified as "Summary of Air Traffic Hijack Events", pages 4 and 13, it is indicated that
American Airlines flight 11 (N334AA) and United Airlines flight 175 (N612UA) were not transmitting proper transponder identification data at the time
of their respective destructions and that therefore, proper aircraft registration identification cannot have been obtained from this absent or
erroneous data.
www.911blogger.com...
If the Government would produce some of the airplane crash debris, like the time change out parts on all the airplanes, and match the parts with their
serial numbers to said airplanes, then we will have some proof. However the Government refuses to do so, and they refuse to release the serial
numbers of the black box’s. So in a nut shell there is no proof any of these four airplanes even cashed much less even existed. I have shown you
all proof, that this part of Government story is a lie. Yes, you should be MAD! Mad as hell!
Two of them crashed in New York City one against each of the WTC towers. The third plane crashed against the Pentagon, and the fourth
crashed in fields in Shanksville Pa.
Lets just start with the Shankville Pa. crash this is just for starters:
UNITED 93 DATA PROVIDED BY US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SUPPORT OBSERVED EVENTS
Pilots for 9/11 Truth, an international organization of pilots and aviation professionals, petitioned the National Transportation and Safety Board
(NTSB) via the Freedom of Information Act to obtain United Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder information, consisting of a Comma Separated Value (CSV)
file and Flight Path Animation, allegedly derived from Flight 93 Flight Data Recorder (FDR). The data provided by the NTSB contradict observed events
in several significant ways:
1. The NTSB Flight Path Animation approach path and altitude does not support observations.
2. All Altitude data on the northern approach contradicts witnesses published by the New York Times.
3. Witness observations of approach path contradict northern approach as described by Popular Mechanics and the US Govt. Several witnesses observed
the aircraft approaching from southeast over Indian Lake and from the south prior to witnessing explosion. Parts found in New Baltimore, 8 miles
southeast of crater is a direct contradiction to the northern approach claimed by the US Govt.
4. Environmental Protection Agency reports no soil contamination of jet fuel after testing 5,000-6,000 yards of earth including 3 ground wells. Smoke
plume photographed by a witness does not suggest a jet fuel rich explosion.
5. Impact angle according to Flight Data Recorder does not support an almost vertical impact as the govt story and crater suggests
pilotsfor911truth.org...
Now let’s have a look at what evident we have about flight 77 that supposed to have crash at the Pentagon.
The Lack of Foundation Damage at the Pentagon is Irreconcilable with the Official Reports and Data
Craig Ranke, Rob Balsamo
03/15/08 - The lack of foundation damage at the Pentagon is irreconcilable with the official reports and is strong physical evidence contradicting the
9/11 official story.
The ASCE Building Performance Report has meticulously documented the damage to the building and has come to the conclusion that all damage from the
alleged plane impact was limited to the bottom two floors, but primarily below the 2nd floor slab so that 90 tons of jumbo jet would have slid on
it's belly across the 1st floor slab all the way through the C-ring.
The physical evidence at the Pentagon is anomalous on many levels and irreconcilable with the official reports. The DoD itself called the damage
"counter-intuitive". The animation released by Purdue University actually omits the engines from the airframe and does not continue vertical
stabilizer path, most likey due to the fact they cannot account for the lack of damage observed at the pentagon from these heavy airframe structures.
Questions like this are why so many who research 9/11 initially had issues with the Pentagon attack. The anomalous damage and lack of parts recovered
-- which were never positively identified as having come from American Airlines Flight 77, nor will government agencies release such information via
FOIA, giving unlawful excuse to withhold this information -- is just as observably questionable as the collapse of WTC 7.
Some researchers have abandoned the Pentagon attack primarily due to the mainstream media published eyewitness accounts of a plane. However, when
analyzed, many of the witness accounts vary from what Mainstream Media has published. Witness list has been analyzed here.
When considering the eyewitness reports and on location research of Citizen Investigation Team and the Flight Data Recorder analysis by Pilots for
9/11 Truth, there can be no other conclusion than that both sets of data are irreconcilable with the physical damage to the building. Government
agencies refuse to comment, mainstream (and some alternative media) refuse to report it.
pilotsfor911truth.org...
This last one was as a result of the passergers getting organized and attacking the hijackers because they found out through plane-phones
what had happened at NYC and Washington and decided not to let the terrorists use them as another weapon to crash against some building.
It is believed that the target of this last plane was either the White House or the Capitol Building in D.C.
From the hijacked airplanes there were numerous phone calls, most of them made from plane-phones and a few made from cell phones. From this calls, a
lot of information was inmediately available to authorities as far as who the hijackers were
Oh yes the famous phone calls from Barbra Olsen where the media got all their info that morning on 911. Was it “true”?
BREAKING 9/11 NEWS: FBI Says Barbara Olsen Did Not Call Ted Olsen. Bush Solicitor General LIED !!
Nationally syndicated talk show host Charles Goyette uncovered blockbuster information in his drive-time interview with author David Ray Griffin.
A center piece of the increasingly apparent BULLSH*T story our government and corporate media have fed us for six long years was a complete
fabrication!
We were fed a lie by Ted Olsen who served as Solictor General for the Bush Administration, when on 9/11 he held a press conference to tell America and
the world that his dead wife had called him before her demise from the jet she was on that had just been hijacked.
Personally, I thought it was odd at the time that a man would decide to hold a press conference minutes after hearing of his own wife’s death, when
it happened on 9/11. If my own wife had just died, the last thing I’d want to do would be to talk to anyone, let alone call a press conference. It
didn’t “smell” right.
Now we know why it didn’t smell right. It was a lie. The FBI has reported that no such call between Barbara Olsen and Ted Olsen ever took place on
9/11/2001.
It was part of the rapidly unraveling scam that is the official story of 9/11.
In fact, Griffin went on to explain that there is zero evidence that any hijackers had commandeer
[edit on 12/20/2008 by cashlink]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 05:06 PM by cashlink
|
reply to post by rush969
But, as Griffin rightly points out, in this interview, there is no “EVIDENCE” of their existence.
Which also reveals that mis-information shill, Popular Mechanics, in their 9/11 interview on the Charles Goyette Show months ago, lied when they told
us there was DNA evidence of the so-called Muslim hijackers. LIES, all lies.
Find links to the entire interviews of February 19, 2008, at:
www.911blogger.com...
When will corporate media stop their participation in a criminal cover up? If the former Solicitor General lying to America by creating a complete
fabrication he spread around the world through corporate media, is not a story worthy of CNN, FOX, ABC, NBC, CBS, Democracy Now, The Nation, Rolling
Stone, PBS, NPR, and all the other fourth estate . . . then they have no right to refer to themselves as media.
www.opednews.com...
.
Which were their seats for instance, and from this information authorities were able to determine the possible identities of some of the
hijackers. It is believed that some of them were traveling under different names from their real ones, but some are believed to have been using their
real names.
From one of the hijacked airplanes one of the terrorists actually made an anouncement which he aparently intended to give to the passengers on an
active air traffic frequency and so traffic controllers were able to hear the terrorist saying something like: "we have several aircraft, and there
is a bomb on board, we are returning to the airport, don´t move, and do as you are told, and everything will be allright". This transmition was
actually made public after a few days of the hijackings.
So far there is no proof! That those recording came from any highjack airplanes. Prove it?
There was a great amount of confussion during the hijackings and the crashes and authorities got to the point of believing there were more
hijacked flights, at a certain point the FAA ordered a TOTAL GROUND STOP. All flights that had not taken off got canceled and all flights that were
in the air were ordered to LAND AT THE NEAREST AIRPORT. Within a few hours all civilian aviation had come to a stand still and it remained grounded
for several days.
This part is true.
In NYC the crashes of the planes against the buildings, damaged these greatly in their structure. Both planes hit the towers at very high
speed and loaded with a lot of fuel, which created a unique situation that was not considered in the design.
What? Not “considered” in the design!
The World Trade Center Building Designers: Pre-9/11 claims strongly implicate that the Towers should have remained standing on 9/11
By Arabesque
The World Trade Center (WTC) Towers[1] were the largest buildings ever conceived in 1960.[2] This meant that there was a considerable amount of
planning:
“The structural analysis carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson is the most complete and detailed of any ever made for
any building structure. The preliminary calculations alone cover 1, 200 pages and involve over 100 detailed drawings… The building as designed is
sixteen times stiffer than a conventional structure. The design concept is so sound that the structural engineer has been able to be
ultra-conservative in his design without adversely affecting the economics of the structure.”[3]
In July of 1971, the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) presented a national award judging the WTC Towers to be “the engineering project
that demonstrates the greatest engineering skills and represents the greatest contribution to engineering progress and mankind.”[4]
Like many modern structures and buildings, the WTC Towers were over-designed to withstand weight distribution in the event of structural damage.
According to calculations made by the engineers who helped with the design of the Twin Towers, “all the columns on one side of a Tower could be cut,
as well as the two corners and some of the columns on each adjacent side, and the building would still be strong enough to withstand a
100-mile-per-hour wind.”[5] As well, “Live loads on these columns can be increased more than 2,000% before failure occurs.”[6]
In the planning of the buildings the designers considered potential attacks, and the WTC
arabesque911.blogspot.com...
[edit on 12/20/2008 by cashlink]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 05:08 PM by cashlink
|
reply to post by rush969
In spite of this the buildings didn´t topple or fail at that instant, but the fire and the damage to them was such, that after some time,
aproximately 1 hr. in one case an 2 hrs. in the other, there was a failure in the structure of each tower in the area were the plane had hit, and the
portion of the building above that area fell on the lower portion, which was unable to support it. Due to the unique design of these towers, they
collapsed after this event, the outer structure of the buildings coming appart as the higher portion of building was falling on the lower section. As
the mass falling grew, it continued to destroy the lower part of each tower totally disintegrating it. These events, as well as the crash of the
second airplane on the tower were seen live worldwide because great coverage was taking place about the fire caused by the first plane.
This is not all true, I will present proof.
This is a distance shot with Edna Cintron waving.
It is a bit over two seconds long. This is a video of Edna Cintron waving in side the impact hole in the WTC after the so call plane crash in the WTC.
If the fires where sooo “hot” from the airplane crash why is this woman standing in the impact hole.
thewebfairy.com...
Edna Cintron the Waving Woman of 911
Sometime ago I posted an article called: 9/11 and the Twin Towers: Sudden Collapse Initiation was Impossible
In it I used the frame of a video showing a woman standing in the gaping hole made by the plane which crashed in the first Twin Tower dispelling the
myth of the roaring inferno that allegedly caused the pulverisation of the Towers. This still actually came from the FEMA rapport.
The commenter stated that if this was not a photoshopped photo it would indeed cast serious doubt over the official Conspiracy theory. So I went and
did some googling and
found back an assembly of the original video’s which clearly show this woman standing in the hole from different angles.
aotearoaawiderperspective.wordpress.com...
The NIST WTC 7 Report: Bush Science reaches its peak
www.911truth.org...
NIST Exploring 9/11 “Blast Events” for WTC-7; New Witness Confirms ScholarsPrevious Findings
rinf.com...
Dr. Wyndham’s Reply to NIST About Their WTC 7Final Report
Physical Evidence for the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7
1. The rapid onset of collapse indicates controlled demolition. Natural collapses begin slowly as the steel deforms (but this has never before led to
collapse from office fires).
2. The symmetrical, straight-down nature of the collapse. In a natural collapse, the building would tend to topple or show asymmetries.
3. The time taken by the collapse, approximately 6.5 seconds. This is almost free-fall speed and indicates little resistance, which is
incomprehensible if natural. Your theory of a slower collapse within the outer frame of the building is outrageous speculation.
4. The neat, tidy debris pile, a few stories high, with adjoining buildings essentially untouched. Such a pile is the main objective and hallmark of
controlled demolition.
5. The molten metal and high temperatures observed for weeks afterwards in the debris pile. Only incendiary and explosive materials, such as thermite,
thermate, and nano-thermites could produce these temperatures. Particles in the dust indicate these materials.
6. The evidence of corroded steel with sulfur found by FEMA. Again, sulfur is a product of a thermate reaction.
Eye-witness Evidence for the Controlled Demolition of WTC 7
1. The testimony of Barry Jennings. Mr. Jennings timeline is crucial and unassailable. The essentials of his story were told to Eye-Witness Channel 7
News shortly after 1 pm on 9/11/01, and later elaborated on in taped interviews. BEFORE either tower fell, he was blown back, by an explosion, from
the sixth floor to the eighth floor in a stairwell in WTC 7. The sixth floor landing was destroyed. Help came twice and ran away when each tower
collapsed. He was in the dark for several hours. He heard explosions from that time (before 9:58 am) until he was found and led to safety around 1 pm.
At that time the lobby of WTC 7 was completely destroyed. None of this could have happened because of the tower collapses. All his eye-witness
evidence points to pre-demolition blasts in WTC 7.
2. The video-taped statements of various firemen and policemen before 5:20 pm on 9/11/01 to the effect that WTC 7 was “coming down” or “about to
blow up.” This pre-knowledge indicates controlled demolition.
3. The video-taped statement of a witness who overheard a “count-down” for WTC 7 on a worker’s radio.
4. The many videos showing the actual collapse of WTC 7, with various evidences of controlled demolition such as a kink in the roof, exploding charges
at upper stories, and so on.
5. Audible explosions heard by eye-witnesses just before and during the collapse of WTC 7.
willyloman.wordpress.com...
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 05:09 PM by cashlink
|
reply to post by rush969
World Trade Center Destruction Forensics
• Videos featuring footage
• Videos with WTC destruction analysis
• Videos of television broadcasts
• Audio recordings with WTC destruction analysis
Videos Featuring Footage
911research.wtc7.net...
During these events the crash against the Pentagon took place. That crash was an American Airlines plane. There were numerous wittnesses who
were in the vicinity and many actually identified the AA logo and paint job on the aircraft.
American and United Airlines were able to stablish which flights had been hijacked almost inmediatly working toghether with the FAA, FBI, and the
airphone companies because in many of the calls made from the planes the passengers or crew mentioned what flight they were on...
(more to come...)
Could phone calls be made on those airplanes on 911?
911 Cell Phone Calls From
Planes? Not Likely
www.rense.com...
Reported Cell Phone Calls from the 9/11 Planes
Further Reflections Evoked by a Critique
by Prof. David Ray Griffin
The "Cell Phone Myth"
The central target of Kornkven’s critique is what he calls the Cell Phone Myth, which he defines in his Comment as "the idea, advocated by Griffin,
that the majority of calls were made on cell phones." However, I do not believe that there were any cell phone calls from the planes.
Kornkven evidently stated his meaning more accurately in the first paragraph of his Comment, in which he said: "Despite Griffin's claims to the
contrary in Chapter 17 of 9/11 Contradictions, neither the FBI nor the 9/11 [Commission] ever claimed that all, or even most, of the calls were made
on cell phones." But I never said anything remotely similar to this.
With regard to the 9/11 Commission, I pointed out that its report mentioned cell phone calls, but without specifying how many such calls were
allegedly made, only in relation to United Flight 93.6
With regard to the FBI, almost all of my discussion is about its 2006 report to the Moussaoui trial, at which it said that there had been only two
cell phone calls from all four flights combined. With regard to the FBI’s position prior to then, I made only two comments. My first comment was a
complaint that "the FBI had not discouraged the press or the 9/11 Commission from claiming that passengers had used cell phones to report the
existence of hijackers on the planes."7 Although that statement said nothing about what the FBI claimed, something was at least implied by my second
comment: Using the word "authorities" to refer primarily to the FBI, I spoke of "one of the chief elements in the story about 9/11 told by
authorities and the press from the outset---that the presence of hijackers on the flights had been reported by means of cell phone calls from those
flights."8 I clearly suggested that the FBI immediately after 9/11 was stating that hijackers were reported on cell phone calls. To say that,
however, is not to say that the FBI claimed that "all, or even most, of the calls were made on cell phones."
I said so little about the 9/11 Commission and pre-2006 FBI assertions because virtually all of my discussion in the chapter was about what was
reported by the press and consequently widely believed.
www.globalresearch.ca...
So here what I have found to be the supporting facts, I hope this helps some people who are not familiar with the lies of the Government version of
911.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 05:49 PM by rush969
|
continue...
The following took place from Sep. 11 to Sep. 30:
President Bush called the terrorist attacks "acts of war." For many days stunned rescue workers continued to search for bodies in the World Trade
Center's smoking rubble after the attack that shut down the financial capital, badly damaged the Pentagon and left thousands dead.
President George W. Bush pledged a crusade against terrorists, saying there was "no question" Osama bin Laden was the "prime suspect" in the Sept.
11 attack. US officials warned that the new war on terrorism will be a long, often secret and a "dirty" contest.
In Afghanistan Islamic clerics demanded proof from the US that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the Sep 11 terrorist attacks. They also requested
that the Organization of Islamic Conference, a group of over 50 Muslim countries, make a formal demand for bin Laden’s handover.
President Bush said the United States wanted terrorism suspect Osama bin Laden "dead or alive." The President visited a mosque in Washington as he
appealed to Americans to get back to everyday business and not turn against their Muslim neighbors.
The President warned Afghanistan that he would not negotiate to take custody of Osama bin Laden. The Pentagon began deploying troops, ships and planes
to the Persian Gulf under code name “Operation Infinite Justice.”
A chartered flight left the US with members of the sprawling bin Laden family. The FBI interviewed 22 of the 26 people aboard.
In Afghanistan the ruling Taliban rejected Pres. Bush’s ultimatum and to give up Osama bin Laden.
Osama bin Laden issued a statement that called for Muslim brothers to resist the “Christian-Jewish crusade led by the big crusader Bush under the
flag of the Cross…”
US Sec. of State Colin Powell vowed the US would give allies evidence detailing Osama bin Laden’s connection to the Sep 11 attacks.
President Bush ordered a freeze on the assets of 27 people and organizations with suspected links to terrorism, including Islamic militant Osama bin
Laden, and urged other nations to do likewise.
Naseer Ahmed Mujahed, Osama bin Laden’s military chief, faxed a statement to news agencies that said: “Wherever there are Americans and Jews, they
will be targeted.”
Interpol issued a bulletin for the arrest of Ayman al-Zawahiri (50), an Egyptian surgeon believed to be Osama bin Laden’s closest al Qaeda associate
in Afghanistan.
In Afghanistan the Taliban said it had delivered an official request for Osama bin Laden to leave the country.
Taliban leader Mohammed Omar told a 9-member Pakistani delegation that the Taliban would be willing to fight to the death to protect Osama bin Laden
from US military forces.
Leaders of the Taliban said they had Osama bin Laden “under our control,” but would release him to the US only if shown proof that he plotted the
Sep 11 attacks. Pres. Bush said he would not negotiate.
On Oct. 1 The US gave Nato "clear and compelling" evidence that Osama bin Laden orchestrated the Sep 11 terrorist attacks.
On Oct. 2 NATO Secretary-General Lord Robertson said the United States had provided "clear and conclusive" evidence of Osama bin Laden's
involvement in the attacks on New York and Washington.
On Oct. 4 The British government released a 16-page document over the Internet that presented details on Osama bin Laden’s responsibility for the
Sep 11 terrorist attacks. And Pakistan announces that it sees sufficient grounds for an indictment against Osama bin Laden.
On Oct. 6 US and British intelligence identify Mohammed Atef, a former Egyptian policeman and close aide to Osama bin Laden, as the key planner of the
of the Sep 11 attacks.
On Oct. 7 The Al-Jazeera TV network from Qatar showed video footage of Osama bin Laden praising Allah for the Sep 11 terrorist attacks.
The US began building a broad int’l. coalition for a possible military retaliation against those responsible.
more later...
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 05:57 PM by cashlink
|
reply to post by rush969
Rush969, I will have to respond later to your post I am running out of time.
I am not brushing you off I promises.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 20-12-2008 @ 06:01 PM by rush969
|
A quick message to "Cashlink":
Your sources speak for themselves!
I think you still have to mention Dr. Juddy Wood and Dr. Jim Fetzer.
With their energy beams and stuff.
Of course let´s not forget the Klingons and the Romulans!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
<< 1 2 3 4 5 >>
|
|
|