Originally posted by John Matrix
The beginning of our planet: Your explanation is pure fantasy. It is not based on empirical scientific methods. No one observed any of
this.
can we solve a murder if no one saw it bieng commited?
solve a rape case if the victim was unconcious?
and that reliese on impiracal scientific methods too, you dont have to see it your just have to be able to understand the evidence form a working
conclusion and then prove its accurate
which they did and are doing
by your deffinition all murderers should be released unles they were seen killing the victim, having the corpse stashed under the floorboards the
murder weapon covered in the victims blood and the killers finger prints, the blood stained clothing of the killer ..... none of it counts bacause
they only have the evidence no one actually saw it
see the problem with your argument?
Think about a television set that is turned on but not receiving a transmission. You have random static referred to as snow. It's a black and
white picture of snow created by the electron gun in the television firing random electrons. The likelihood of evolution is the same as the likelihood
that the electron gun is going to randomly, over millions of years, produce a color picture of my naked wife.
wow havnt i explained exactly
why this metaphor is wrong twice already? and how if theose electrons were subject to natural selection the image would quickly appear?
have dead horse will flog i guess
I remain unconvinced. It is quite logical to associate design in the universe to an intelligent designer.
except theres no logic to
show its designed
Teach people that they are a product of chance and evolved from slime, then on to animals, and they will act like animals.
yes wont get
any crusades witch burning or children in africa today bieng killed and tortured ...... o wait thats what christianity as a religeon did and is still
doing today......
They daily news programs are proof of that. That's something that can be observed!!
what that countries with the highest athiest
count highest science education are the ones with the lowest crime rates? the best education systems? best health systems?
while the most religeous are not?
No offence intended, but I do find this hypothesis to be an assault on logic and reason.
yes becasue magic is so logical isnt it
...?
I am convinced that the creator himself could not come down to earth and convince you otherwise. So, I leave you with my two sense.
actually that would be a start, after all atheists are just those looking for proof before they jump in feet first ... so maybe he should
Evolution scientists get all the gov. funding. Creation scientists don't. It's hard to speak the truth when you know your funding depends on
your promulgating lies.
actually science is quite often self supporting, and when a high capital earner like the bio industries make lots of
money they share some of it for the less able to self fund fields of science
science gains knowledge and makes applications, those applications make money that money funds more science
[edit on 19/12/08 by noobfun]
wait what? natural process that has is and will be observered to have is and will alter genetics in living organisms is
fantasy 
