It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by daddyroo45
This news is exciting to say the least.Archeology has mislead us for years,while hiding the artifacts that don't fit their narrow explanations of origins.
I await the photos with great anticipation.
I read about the foundation stones of Baalbek within the past year. That alone shattered my previous belief system.
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to post by serbsta
As stated in the PDF that Harte link to they used other dating methods and not C14.
Originally posted by Truther
The pyramids in giza, are suposed to be two thousand years old and there bairly standing, what makes you think that a two million year old city would be still standing.
Humans were around two million years ago, there is 100percent proof of this, if you only open your eyes, and do some research..
It is not the maker of the stones, which have been estimated to be at least 6000 years old.
It is the size of the largest. They are in the neighborhood of 2000 tons.
I could deal with hundreds of slaves moving pyramid stones in Egypt weighing on the average of 20-30 tons, some as large as 70 tons.
But stones weighing almost 2000 tons? Can you explain that? I can't. That is what shattered my belief system.
Originally posted by Sliick
ummm.....wow. just wow. we went from sumeria being the birthplace of civilization 6000 years old, to 2 million year old artifacts in a cave.
I'm thinking Homonoids, not Homosapiens. I don't think we ran around for almost 2 million years without thinking of building a city.
Sorry no distant supernovas don't 'reset' radioactive materials