Two million year old find!, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 72 times


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 07:27 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by serbsta



As stated in the PDF that Harte link to they used other dating methods and not C14.



reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 07:32 PM by serbsta
Originally posted by Hanslune
reply to
post by serbsta



As stated in the PDF that Harte link to they used other dating methods and not C14.


Oh i see now, thanks for pointing that out.

Well if this is all legit than this site needs to be fully excavated and maybe there are still some kind of remains buried deep below that could help solve who drew/created this.


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 07:43 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by serbsta



Forgot to relink to the Pdf, here you go

PDF

More research based on Wonderwerk cave

researchspace.csir.co.za...


www.sciencemag.org...




[edit on 18/12/08 by Hanslune]


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 08:50 PM by JoeBarna
reply to post by Hanslune



It is not the maker of the stones, which have been estimated to be at least 6000 years old. It is the size of the largest. They are in the neighborhood of 2000 tons. I could deal with hundreds of slaves moving pyramid stones in Egypt weighing on the average of 20-30 tons, some as large as 70 tons. But stones weighing almost 2000 tons? Can you explain that? I can't. That is what shattered my belief system.


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 08:50 PM by cruzion
They could be one of four Hominids:
Africanus, Robustus, Habilis, Erectus. Seems they were all kicking about ~ 2 million years ago, which seems like a long time ago, but it's a tiny drop in the ocean of geologic time (4.6 billion years).
Interesting stuff OP.


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 09:03 PM by DrPaulisENKI
reply to post by JoeBarna



This is similar in weight to 3 commercial jets that were lifted 36 feet off the ground. There is absolutely no proof that the Romans were capable of doing this .... none. Some people simply cannot look past their dusty archeology books for more likely possibilities. Find another block in Rome that's similar in size. ...... some of us know what you mean


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 09:43 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by JoeBarna





It is not the maker of the stones, which have been estimated to be at least 6000 years old.


There was some bronze age habitation there but they didn't build anything, the stone work is Roman. I believe if you check your find that estimate comes from a unevidenced fringe site.


It is the size of the largest. They are in the neighborhood of 2000 tons.


Hans: The trilithon (which are the ones I'm thinking you're thinking of) weigh around 800 tons, they were moved by the Romans and placed as part of a lower slope retaining wall. The big suckers around 1,000 tons were not completed and not moved.

The largest trilithon stone is aproximately 3.4 meters by 4.5 meters by 19 meters. That comes to 290 cubic meters. If the measurements from sacred sites are right and it is limestone then the stones should be about 696 tons. If it is high density limestone then the stones should be about 841 tons. So a guesestimate of 800 tons is about right - unless someone can get a really big bathroom scale in there....



I could deal with hundreds of slaves moving pyramid stones in Egypt weighing on the average of 20-30 tons, some as large as 70 tons.


Hans: No slaves, craftmen backed up by free men


But stones weighing almost 2000 tons? Can you explain that? I can't. That is what shattered my belief system.


Hans: Well not to worry they didn't move those stones. The Romans had windlass' and used relays of them to move heavy objects.

The heaviest object moved without mechanical help was by the Russians who moved a 1,600 ton piece of red granite several hundred miles for a statue now called the Bronze horseman. The heaviest ancient stone moved was around 1-1,200 tons - the Egyptians did that but not in regards to the pyramids.



[edit on 18/12/08 by Hanslune]



reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 10:49 PM by Hanslune
reply to post by Saidar



We are talking about stone tools, they tend to last, well, like stone.

Sorry no distant supernovas don't 'reset' radioactive materials.


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 11:14 PM by Saidar
reply to post by Hanslune





Sorry no distant supernovas don't 'reset' radioactive materials


Maybe is said it wrong, not reset but the decaying process can be tampered with, and even more so when the nuclei of atoms are excited by bombardment of solar particles, that are provided by distant super novas. That is a fact. All radioactive dating methods are rendered useless by the fact that the decaying process are not the same through the years.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Origin of Ancient Jade Tool Baffles Scientists
  Posted 7 days ago with 96 member flags
12,000 Years Old Unexplained Structure
  Posted 4 days ago with 81 member flags
The Uluburun shipwreck sunk 3,400 years ago
  Posted 15 days ago with 70 member flags
Sigiriya : The 8th Wonder of the World
  Posted 4 days ago with 45 member flags
Tomb of Queen Heterpheres
  Posted 16 days ago with 29 member flags
R.O.V. Photos of Sunken Megaliths off Western Cuba
  Posted 11 days ago with 21 member flags