2012: the movie, page 4
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 01:39 PM by footfall
reply to post by FlyersFan


the UN is not paying for the movie that guy doesnt know what he's talking about


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 01:45 PM by 12.21.12
reply to post by Alxandro


There's allegedly an ark of sorts under Denver International Airport. You will have to shoot your way through to get to it.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 02:30 PM by ItsTheQuestion
Originally posted by footfall
reply to post by FlyersFan


the UN is not paying for the movie that guy doesnt know what he's talking about


With all due respect, newbie...

how do you know?

I have no idea whether or not 2012 is funded by the UN. So, in the protocol of ATS, I will not make a claim either way. Suggest you consider adopting the same protocol around here.

Happy New Year.


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 02:43 PM by HiAliens
reply to post by xbranscombex


Well spotted. I noticed that too, as I'm a huge Kubrick fan. And yes, it's extremely creepy, but it pretty much proves the whole movie's just a psy-op to scare people. Predictive programming.
There could well be problems over the next few years, but movies like this are not out to help/warn people, just to cower them into submission.

VERY IMPORTANT: The water creeping over the mountains in slow motion also directly mirrors the Shining trailer, with the blood flooding into the hotel lobby. This is no accident. This movie is made to instill fear.

-Y

Yawn. Again, if they are hoping to warn people why use horror music, and why reference Kubrick visually and aurally?

It's not good enough to say; "it was cool music so they borrowed it," the waves over the mountain are supposed to reference the blood in the trailer.




[edit on 27-12-2008 by HiAliens]

[edit on 27-12-2008 by HiAliens]


reply posted on 27-12-2008 @ 10:32 PM by footfall
reply to post by ItsTheQuestion


how about the other guy does research to prove that the UN is paying for it. and dont criticize me for disagreeing with someones rediculous claim that the UN is sponsoring the film when he provided no proof or sources for his info. why should i have to prove that he is wrong when he has not done anything but make a claim that by common sense seems far fetched without some sort of supporting proof. and i think somebody else said something about this right before this post so check that out too


reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 01:30 PM by mmariebored
reply to post by Spooky Fox Mulder

The size of the bandwagon is directly proportional to the pocket that will benefit in the end.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russians know, We assume, NASA is silent ...
  Posted 11 days ago with 35 member flags
Sun flares affect our pineal gland, causing mass awakening?
  Posted 3 days ago with 34 member flags
Are we paying attention enough? Strange Sounds in the sky
  Posted 18 days ago with 33 member flags
Bring Your Toothbrush? A Journey To The Stars...
  Posted 9 days ago with 23 member flags
2012 Believers are the Definition of Sheeple
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
Tell me to stop
  Posted 8 days ago with 11 member flags
The Chevy Silverado 2012 Mayan Apocalpse Commercial
  Posted 8 days ago with 10 member flags