April Gallop suing Rumsfeld and Cheney!!!, page 3

privacy

Pages: << 1 2 3 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times

reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 07:34 AM by SPreston

September 18, 2008
Alex Jones talks to former Pentagon employee April Gallop about her experience at ground zero on September 11, 2001.
37:15 6.40MB
www.radiodujour.com...

April Dawn Gallop states that a person who helped her out of the impact hole onto the lawn, immediately went back inside through the hole. Later in the hospital, somebody brought April her wallet with her military ID inside from her office.

A person in civilian clothes escorted by Army/Navy officers, told April in her hospital bed exactly what she saw; in other words the 9-11 OFFICIAL STORY with the 19 alleged hijackers.

April did receive a Purple Heart for her injuries inside the Pentagon, but her remaining AWOL charge is holding up her nomination for the Soldier's Medal and much-needed funds for her injured son.

In the chaos and confusion of the days following 9/11 she was mistakenly reported dead on arrival (DOA), and Absent Without Official Leave (AWOL). While the record identifying her as DOA has been corrected, the record that lists her as AWOL has yet to be corrected in the 3 years since 9/11.

That erroneous record continues to interfere with her ability to receive the Soldier's Medal for which she has been duly nominated for heroism in the face of extreme danger. While others were running away to save themselves, she took time to pull others from the rubble.

It seems that the medal is hung up in some bureaucratic snafu. This snafu has also interfered with her ability to receive relief funds from the military and private charities. It seems clear that this situation is a microcosm of the larger problem that created the conditions that allowed the terrorists to succeed in the 911 attack.

www.headinjury.com...

Pentagon Honors Its Heroes
by Staff Sgt. Triggs

WASHINGTON (Army News Service, Oct. 25, 2001) - Seventy Pentagon personnel were honored Oct. 23 for their acts of bravery on Sept. 11 when a jetliner crashed into the Pentagon and sent a rolling ball of fire through its corridors.

About half of the recipients received the Soldier's Medal for rescuing people trapped in the burning inferno. The ceremony was held at Conmy Hall, Fort Myer, Va.

There were five types of awards issued including the Defense of Freedom Medal, a newly authorized medal to honor civilians who are wounded or killed as a result of hostile action against the United States.

"I have many memories ... of Sept. 11 ... But few are as strong as what I saw in the hallways and on the grounds of the Pentagon in the minutes and hours following the attack," Sgt. Maj. of the Army Jack Tilley said during the hour-long awards ceremony.
www.defenseoffreedom.com...

[edit: clipped quoted content]
Mod Edit: External Source Tags – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 1-1-2009 by 12m8keall2c]

reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 08:10 AM by SPreston

She searched in the dark for her infant child

Center For 9/11 Justice
2033 North Main Street
Walnut Creek, CA 94596

April Dawn Gallop worked in the Network Infrastructure Services Agency next to the Navy Center and the alleged impact point of the aircraft which never impacted the Pentagon, because it actually flew Over the Naval Annex and North of the Citgo, and nowhere near the staged light poles and staged damage path through the Pentagon.

Her Attorney William Veale demonstrates the long history of US False Flag attacks against its own citizens and against its own military. An inside look at a little of the strategy which will be used against the Bush Regime traitors, is also hinted at. The ability of the powerful totally corrupt Bush Regime government and perhaps the next regime to prolong trials and intimidate witnesses is shown. Dennis Cunningham is also another attorney for April Gallop.

Congress ruled that all 9-11 personal injury lawsuits must be filed at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

December 22, 2008

Alex Jones talks with attorney and 9/11 truth activist Bill Veale and discusses his case with Pentagon survivor April Gallop against Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, who they say did not warn of the attack despite having nearly 20 minutes to do so.

34:10 5.87MB
www.radiodujour.com...

YouTube Link

12-18-2008
The case was filed by April Gallop on December 15, 2008 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The case is entitled April Gallop, for Herself and as Mother and Next of Friend of Elisha Gallop, a Minor v. Dick Cheney, Vice President of the U.S.A., Donald Rumsfeld, former U.S. Secretary of Defense, General Richard Meyers, U.S.A.F. (Ret.), and John Does I-X, all in their individual capacities, Case No. 08-CV-10881-DC.

Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman has been assigned to the case.

United States District Court Judge Denny Chin has been assigned to the case.

The complaint was entered on the Court's docket today. The complaint is not available in electronic form on the Court's website (PACER), probably because it was filed in paper form.

The clerk of the Court has issued a summons for the defendants.

April Gallop is shown as representing herself, PRO SE, in the case.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___

APRIL GALLOP, for Herself and as Mother and Next Friend of ELISHA GALLOP, a Minor, No. _____________

Plaintiff, Jury Trial Demanded

vs.

DICK CHENEY, Vice President of the U.S.A., DONALD RUMSFELD, former U.S. Secretary of Defense, General RICHARD MYERS, U.S.A.F. (Ret.), and John Does Nos. 1– X, all in their individual capacities, Defendants.
__________________________________________

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSPIRACY, AND OTHER WRONGS

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands Trial By Jury, and Judgment against all defendants, jointly and severally, for compensatory and punitive damages in such amounts as the Jury may see fit to award; treble damages under 18 U.S.C. 2333(a), and costs of suit, expenses and attorneys fees...

Yours, etc.,

DATED: December 15, 2008.

[edit on 1/1/09 by SPreston]

reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 09:09 AM by SPreston

Justice seeking persons all over the world are interested in the April Gallop lawsuit against the Bush Regime. Plantiff charges that government officials came to her bedside at the hospital and informed her what the OFFICIAL STORY government tale would be. Her wallet and military ID were later retrieved from her office in the 'burning' Pentagon wedge 1 area and returned to her at her hospital bed.

April Gallop (AG - plaintiff)

The plaintiff alleges her belief that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11, although it appears that one swooped low over the building just when bombs went off inside, or a missile hit, or both. These may have been controlled from E-4B, the Air Force "doomsday plane" which was shown live on CNN, circling over Washington at the time of the attack.

But whether a plane hit the building or something else did, certainly there was no warning of a plane's approach; which might have saved the plaintiff and her child, many others who were hurt, and the 125 people, members of the military and civilian employees, who died in the attack that morning. Yet flight controllers broadcast an emergency warning about the plane more than a half-four before the Pentagon was hit.

The explosion(s) destroyed the interior of the building where plaintiff's office was. When she could gather herself from the blast, with help from other survivors, they made their way out through rubble, smoke and dust. She got to the outside, holding her baby, collapsed on the grass, and woke up later in the hospital.

International interest from Sweden

[edit: clipped quoted content]
Mod Edit: Quoting External Sources – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 1-1-2009 by 12m8keall2c]

reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 09:52 AM by CameronFox

Preston,

Does April mention ever smelling diesel fuel burning? If not, does that mean that the generator was not on fire?

Thank you,

Cam

reply posted on 1-1-2009 @ 12:22 PM by jthomas

Originally posted by SPreston
Wow, you finally got something correct. Yes, the treacherous Mainstream News Media is ignoring this story so far. But the internet which is still free thus far, much to your bitter disappointment, is spreading April Gallop's heroic attempt at justice and the search for truth just fine.

Thus disproving your own 9/11 conspiracy theory that the government shut up -- or could shut up -- all those eyewitnesses around the Pentagon in their cars, on the freeways, on the bridges, in the Pentagon Parking lots, from ever reporting they saw a flyover plane.

Thanks for your confession, Mr. Preston, although CIT will be most unhappy with it.

It's about time.

reply posted on 6-1-2009 @ 10:48 PM by Anonymous ATS

None of this makes any difference one way or the other as far as her case goes, FERES DOCTRINE, look it up. Her sons case is a different matter I think. He is not and never has been a member of the military so this 1950's Supreme Court case does not apply to him. So while she is sol it will be interesting to see how far the sons case goes through the court system.

reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 01:48 PM by trebor451

I guess I'm not surprised this has not been brought up yet by the Truthers.

April Gallop Lawsuit thrown out, with prejudice.

PDF is here

This was bound to happen. Th efacts cannot simply be made up out of whole cloth, which is what this whole thing was about. The affidavit provided by PfT, as well, contributed to this epic, galactic failure with its factual inaccuracies and out and out falsehoods.

Some of the money quotes...

Even assuming the factual allegations of the complaint are true, Gallop's claims are not plausible. It is simply not plausible that the Vice President of the United States, the Secretary of Defense, and other high-ranking officials conspired to facilitate terrorist attacks that would result in the deaths of thousands of Americans.

A court may dismiss a claim as "factually frivolous" if the facts alleged are "clearly baseless", that is, "fanciful", fantastic" or "delusional" Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,325,327,328 (1989)) Courts have not hesitated to dismiss complaints asserting delusional claims of conspiracy.3 Indeed, courts have dismissed other cases alleging delusional conspiracy theories about the attacks of September 11,2001.

and my personal favorite...

BecauseGallop's claims are factually baseless -- indeed, because they are fanciful, fantatic, and delusional -- they are dismissed.

make sure, when you go to the PDF link above, that you take a long close look at footnote 2 - where it was noted that in a prior lawsuit, Gallop had taken the position that a passenger airliner had crashed into the Pentagon. This blatant contradiction to this existing lawsuit, I'm sure, had nothing to do with this being thrown up and thrown out faster than the speed of idiocy.

Hopefully those Truthers who have come here and claimed that once Gallop's lawsuit gets underway, all will be well in Trutherland and the curtains will be pulled back and the true, evil operators will be on display for a gasping world to see.

I guess not. What's next now that your best legal argument has been shown to be "factually baseless" and "fanciful, fanatic and delusional"?

reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 02:20 PM by warisover

I'm not sure how far the suit will get. As soon as anything of reliance is brought up, it prolly will be thrown out due to "national security"

"Can we see the cctv tapes of the pentagon during the attack?" NO, they are classified due to national security!

It would be nice to finally get some answers though

reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 02:33 PM by trebor451

Originally posted by warisover
I'm not sure how far the suit will get. As soon as anything of reliance is brought up, it prolly will be thrown out due to "national security"
"Can we see the cctv tapes of the pentagon during the attack?" NO, they are classified due to national security!
It would be nice to finally get some answers though

You didn't really read my post very carefully.

This lawsuit has already been thrown out, and not for any "national security" reasons. It was thrown out because "...Gallop's claims are factually baseless -- indeed, because they are fanciful, fantatic, and delusional -- they are dismissed."

There are your answers.

reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 03:16 PM by warisover

Originally posted by trebor451

You didn't really read my post very carefully.

This lawsuit has already been thrown out, and not for any "national security" reasons. It was thrown out because "...Gallop's claims are factually baseless -- indeed, because they are fanciful, fantatic, and delusional -- they are dismissed."

There are your answers.

Well just because a district judge says "Gallop's claims are factually baseless, fanciful, fanatic, and delusional," does not make them so. In fact I think the judge should be dismissed from his throne and thrown in jail for aiding and abetting, not allowing due process and holding the American people hostage by letting the criminals in government get away with murder.

reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 03:26 PM by rizla

Cheney and rumsfeld will probably be dead by the time it comes out. But not Bush.

reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 09:39 PM by jthomas

Originally posted by trebor451
I guess I'm not surprised this has not been brought up yet by the Truthers.

April Gallop Lawsuit thrown out, with prejudice.

PDF is here

Thanks for that, trebor451. Justice is done.

[edit on 17-3-2010 by jthomas]

reply posted on 17-3-2010 @ 10:17 PM by K J Gunderson

Originally posted by pinch

She also wondered, in that Guns and Butter interview, where were the missiles defenses?

The real question is what is the probability or likelihood that no anti-aircraft defense, warning alarms or additional security mechanism functioned on that particular day?

There have never been *any* "missile defenses" at the Pentagon prior to 9/11. I would expect an Army soldier like Gallop should know that, although since she was in personnel, perhaps that ignorance can be excused. When I worked there in 2000 I knew that.

Where exactly does she say anything about missiles?

reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 07:10 AM by trebor451

Originally posted by jthomas

Originally posted by trebor451
I guess I'm not surprised this has not been brought up yet by the Truthers.

April Gallop Lawsuit thrown out, with prejudice.

PDF is here

Thanks for that, trebor451. Justice is done.

[edit on 17-3-2010 by jthomas]

Quite welcome. For the longest time, the Truthers have clamored for the day in court. All they needed, they said, was to get their "evidence" in front of a judge. They had the best witnesses, the best facts, the best analysis, the best of everything and their "day in court" would blow the lid of the thing.

They had the ideal witness in April Gallop, what with her son and her Army background - the sympathy vote sewn up. They had that brilliant affidavit from PfT - the technical vote sewn up. They even mentioned CIT and thatr crackerjack analysis of the actual flight path - the factual event vote sewn up.

Too bad that their "day in court" ended up with the judge throwing them out on the can with the "fanciful" and "fraudulent" determination. I bet the judge didn't use "bat-poop crazy" because it is not recognized in legal circles.

What is telling, once again, is how this is not even being addressed *in the least* by the Truthers. They are ignoring it, as if it didn't happen. My ex-wife did that a lot. She'd get a speeding ticket and she'd ignore it, as if it didn't happen. Ignore it, it goes away. The Truthers are trying their best to ignore this. Nothing from Preston, nothing from the ATS poster known as tesajw (can't remember his exact spelling right now if that isn't it), nothing from anyone.

This from the same group who said all they needed was "their day in court".

You got it. Where are you?

Where are you?????

reply posted on 18-3-2010 @ 08:34 AM by Six Sigma

Originally posted by K J Gunderson

Where exactly does she say anything about missiles?

Greetings KJ Gunderson,

I believe the complaint Ms. Gallop filed stated that the Pentagon was equipped with anti missile batteries.

This is taken from her complaint filed last year.

+ To cause the normal operation of ground and air defenses which guard the Pentagon from external attack to be altered, suspended or disrupted in such a way as to remove or negate the building's normal protections, and thus permit an airliner, believed to be hijacked by possible suicide bombers, and following a forbidden, descending flight path, to reach the Pentagon undeterred

26. Likewise, by the acts of one or more defendants in furtherance of the conspiracy, no defenses at the Pentagon responded either, no missile or anti-aircraft batteries opening from the ground around the building, or the roof; no sharpshooters deployed with hand-held missiles at stations close by; nothing. And, shockingly, when the towers in New York had already been hit, and Flight 77 (or a substitute, see below) was out of radio contact and headed back towards the capital; and even when the plane approached, and then doubled back and headed toward the building in a long dive, no alarm was sounded.

Here is the source:
rawstory.com...

I too was taken back by this claim. Being an employee there, you would have thought that she would have been privy to this information. It was known that prior to 9/11, there was not anything permanently in place.

A little odd imo.

[edit on 18-3-2010 by Six Sigma]

Pages: << 1 2 3 >> ^^TOP^^