|
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 08:25 AM by Leo Strauss
|

Perhaps we could bring to light that our courageous Sec of Defense Don Rumsfeld left his post while the nation was under attack. Granted he was
helping with survivors but surely a commander knows you do not leave your post to help with the wounded!
If you believe the official story then Don Rumsfeld could not possibly known the scope of the attack! The planes could have been a diversion for some
larger operation. But he left his command post and was not reachable for some time!
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 08:38 AM by audas
|
It is a FACT that Cheyney gave Authorisation for planes to be shot down WITHOUT PRESIDENTIAL APPROVAL.
This has been completely established as undeniable fact is completely illegal, only the President is allowed to give this command.
The telephone conversations recorded, tracked, witnessed or otherwise all point to this (please see the new book "Angler" which details this [Angler
being the CIA code name for Cheyney).
Just thought you might like to know.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 09:25 AM by thefreepatriot
|
its official... the pentagon strike was not an airplane!!! anyone that still continues to argue that it was not is going to be liable for treason and
aiding and abeting war criminals.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 09:28 AM by thefreepatriot
|
Originally posted by NuclearPaul
This will be interesting. Here's some evidence of Cheney's negligence. If she gets more good
evidence like this, she may have a case because they knew what was going on and deliberately did nothing to stop it.
That testimony right there from the transportation secretary..should be enough to put cheney away for life. here it is.
[edit on 18-12-2008 by thefreepatriot]
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 09:58 AM by DEATHUSALL
|
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 10:26 AM by DJMessiah
|
Since it's a civil suit, all the money won by the plaintiff will have to come out of Cheney's and Rumsfeld's pockets.
Here's hoping the family wins all of the money Rumsfeld and Cheney made off the war.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 10:53 AM by dariousg
|
 
Originally posted by Darthorious
If it actually came to a trial (which I highly doubt it will due to the sensitive nature of it all) chances are a settlement would be reached and who
knows they could offer them 1 billion dollars to keep their mouth shut, that's assuming they have got something here the govt. doesn't want in the
public eye.
This is what kills me. We (we being the majority of people in the U.S.) have been programmed to use the 'due to the sensitive nature of it all'
phrase. Meaning that it is a national security issue.
WHAT IS? That is what I don't get. These criminals have used the 'national security' blanket way too often. The only reason for withholding ANY
information about the events of that day is to cover up anything that they may have done to make it happen. Period.
This will indeed go nowhere. And for the guy that says that Rumsfeld wouldn't endanger himself and others, well, you need to look at his history.
First, his pharma connections and the drugs he has pushed on the people. Second, if (and I will say "IF") he was in on the events of that day he
would know that his office would NOT be hit. Why would he have to worry?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 11:18 AM by firepilot
|
But why the need to label her as an officer when she is not?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 11:24 AM by Realtruth
|
This is eye opening news.
The wormhole just got a little deeper.
How much information will it take to make people believe?
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 11:56 AM by ADVISOR
|

Expect to see more military people to speak on issue related to 9/11 and OIF.
This will be the first step, the years following with be outspoken.
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 12:20 PM by spinkyboo
|
   
Please - Please - Please let this go into discovery. I'm thinking positive.
I have to. This administrations deeds need to be outed on a daily basis.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 01:29 PM by zysin5
|
reply to post by TrueAmerican
This is truely one step forward! Rumsfeld, Cheney, these guys are crooks and Skeemers! But they keep on getting away with crimes. And they keep
using loop holes like this to break a case.
Spc. Gallop also says she heard two loud explosions, and does not believe that a Boeing 757 hit the building. Her son sustained a serious brain
injury, and Gallop herself was knocked unconscious after the roof collapsed onto her office.
Okay now she is going vs the offical story. Which we all know is not true.
But. It creates it as a "conspiracy theory" and denied by those who take their sources from the MSM.
So this lady will be labeled a truther, aka Terroist. and not have a leg to stand on with this case, sadly enough.
Why did they have to quote those words? I think they already had enough to make a case. Without evening bothering with I dont think a plane hit..
Granted the truth should be known, but these guys.. again crooks and skeemers. They have pardon powers, and granted to be above the law..
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 02:06 PM by mybigunit
|
There we go. I hope she doesnt just settle on this. Its about time we get what happened on 9/11 out in the open whether you believe it was a
conspiracy or not. Lets get all the evidence in the open in a court of law. I really really hope this goes through. The MSM seem to not want to
mention it.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 02:40 PM by drock905
|
This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first
saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.
As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.
Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 02:41 PM by drock905
|
This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first
saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.
As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.
Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 02:41 PM by drock905
|
This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first
saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.
As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.
Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....
|
copyright & usage
|
|
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.
|
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 02:41 PM by drock905
|
This is going nowhere. She can't prove that the government had any previous knowledge of a Pentagon attack. She has contradicted herself first
saying she saw jet fuel then she didn't. She was knocked out twice during the attack, and didn't have a full picture of what was going on.
As soon as she says a plane didn't hit the pentagon case will be dismissed.
Just looking to make an easy buck, disgusting....
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 02:49 PM by Question
|
Originally posted by Total Reality
Wow, great find! star and flag for anything that has to do with cheney/rumsfeld getting screwed and 9/11 truth. I hope something comes of this. Even
if it is just making some people question the official story.
It's no surprise though that no evacuation was ordered (even though they told us it was ordered) when they also could've shot down two of the planes
but decided to stand down and let them hit their targets.
[edit on 17-12-2008 by Total Reality]
Exactly, even if no justice is served by the legal system, it will bring attention to the official story. Forcing the masses that are asleep, to come
out of their dreamstate and start questioning out govt. If the legal system doesn't end up bringing justice though, I can see people then taking
justice into their own hands.
For those that might not think it possible. Think of it this way, thousands of american soldiers died for a scam. They were duped into thinking they
were serving their country when in reality they were serving only the few rich. How do you think these families and the surviving troops are going to
react to this news if they found out that Rumsfeld, Cheney, Bush et al. FINALLY are point blank admitting that they messed up ON PURPOSE? Personally I
hope they do end up taking justice into their own hands because the legal system has stopped working for the people, and is now only working under the
wishes of the rich, and not the people they were sworn to protect. So now the only way to solve this issue is to take justice by force from those that
choose to ignore their people.
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 02:58 PM by Question
|
 
I know I posted this somewhere else, but I believe this interview on Hardball to be very important for those here who haven't seen it yet and it
shows the kind of attitude our leaders have and the utter disregard they have for our american soldiers:
P.S. if anybody has the capability of downloading youtube videos, please do so and download these videos to keep as further evidence, should the
people in washington decide later on that they are going to ommit this piece of information from history.
part 1
part 2
|
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 03:55 PM by hotrodturbo7
|
"A career Army specialist who survived the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, claims that no evacuation was ordered inside the Pentagon, despite
flight controllers calling in warnings of approaching hijacked aircraft nearly 20 minutes before the building was struck."
SOURCE
They must have made a correction, now she's a specialist.
Wonder if the lower rank (just above private) will affect her credibility?
Not to be combative, but seems kind of like they were sensationalizing her as upper-echelon personnel, when in reality she's pretty much a
coffee-fetcher.
Also with this article, I see the "career" tag applied. If your MOS is anything besides infantry (11*), you will be a specialist when you get out of
advanced individual training (right after basic). 99% chance that she was in her first enlistment. So that makes her "career"?
Wonder how the defense would play this.
Make her look like a low-rent going for the big payday? Entirely possible.
Her boss, who would be a sergeant or staff sergeant, would be at a paygrade that qualifies for food stamps, if that tells you how much she was
making.
Maybe part of the implications or angles that will be seen if this ever breaks into th MSM.
[edit on 18-12-2008 by hotrodturbo7]
[edit on 18-12-2008 by hotrodturbo7]
|
copyright & usage
|
 |