Originally posted by gYvMessanger
people do indeed have fixed or long term beliefs that cannot be proven one way or another, and yet both sides of the argument are willing to claim
absolute authority on this issue.
personally, i dont like this statement.
dont get me wrong, there probably are questions that are unanswerable. no amount of logic or thinking or theories can unravel all the secrets of even
our own earth better yet the whole universe.
however i find alot of people believe the same thing. because god is the ultimate question, there no way it can be proven.
i dont agree.
hypothetically, if god was a force (meaning not a person) or some mixture of force and person (like a tree), or maybe even a person who doesnt know
what he has created (like a person with spoiling tomato sauce in the fridge who accidently makes a habitat ideal for mold). then i would agree. the
answer is unattainable.
from our prospective we can only guess.
however, it is my own personal belief that we have something different. we have a person who wants to be found.
the improbability (if not impossibility) of abiogenesis leads me to believe we were created. the harmony of the bible along with prophecies and
history leads me to believe that god wants us to have a relationship with him. (dont worry, im not going to quote scriptures)
the evidence is plainly there, but there are some reason why to some this is still ¨unprovable¨
---- i believe that some want it to be unprovable. its the almighty god, it cant be that simple. there has to be some ¨mystery¨to it. noone should
be able to figure out the nature of god.
but the simple question is ¨why not¨? why cant it be that simple? understanding the basic nature of god doesnt mean that you know everything about
him, in fact it doesnt mean you know much at all.
people on this forum know certain basic facts about my nature. they know my name, my sex, my race. maybe they know a few bits of information about my
past, but do they really know me? if they decided to spend every day with me for years, wouldnt they learn more?
saying that god is a mystery simply because you want him to be is not an answer based in reality. it is a wish.
---- some people hate what the existence of god implies. the thought of accountability to someone is something they just dont like. these are the
people who make posts about whether god is a killer, or whether god is just. these are questions that we should ask and we should probe, however they
are not asking with a motive of searching. rather, they ask so that they can convince themselves. afterall, if noone can answer the question to a
degree that is satisfactory for them, then they were right, right?
this also implies that ignorance is bliss. some people dont want to know the truth because they dont want to be responsible. if god exists, he/she
cant punish me for something i knew nothing about right?
---- some people honestly dont believe in the existence of god. they reason things like ¨if there was a god, then why is there surffering? ¨ which
of course is a good question. but what happens when a logical explanation is given? does god still remain unprovable?
if god wants to be worshipped, then the issue is provable. its no longer an issue of ¨why do you believe or not believe in god?¨ but rather ¨why do
you
want to believe or not believe in god?¨