What Do YOU Want On The 2009 ATS MIX?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 36 times


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 07:45 PM by zysin5
Greetings Dave!

My idea might be a little long winded here.. However here is the link.
I put forth much research and work into this thread here.
Ideas for you

This is broken up into a few sections, and pretty much covers what I have learned here in my time on ATS.. And what I happen to have taken out of what I have soaken up. What I feel is true. And what I feel is the BIG deal issue.

Thanks for taking the time, and the platform to be heard!
It means alot to me.. And I have been seeking my place in this big world for a long time.. I think Im getting close here.. Take a look threw it, and take what you need.. Leave the rest my friend.



reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:08 PM by Frankidealist35
Hi Dave and Johnny, keep doing what you're doing. I love ATS mix... I love your brand of humor. It keeps me in good spirits!

I think you should have more guests on that talk about the paranormal. The last few weeks you've been on a roll and you've gotten amazing guests and with the alien bay expo thing with the lectures... those were really good.

I would like for you also to get more guests to talk about traditional conspiracies. This is ATS mix show. So you guys should talk about conspiracies. I want to see more people on your show talk about chemtrails, the NWO, the global elite, the bilderburgers, and of course these conspiracies that have to do with the Rockefeller foundation and the British empire and stuff. MORE TRADITIONAL CONSPIRACIES WOULD BE NICE.

Other than that, I think the show is awesome. I love listening to you guys on the bus... it makes my day. Honestly. I'm not kidding. You two keep me from getting bored... I'd like for you to keep doing what you're doing, but, maybe add a few features, like have more skeptic overviews, and maybe, you know with the alien guys/gals you have on your show? Perhaps when there is a major citing you could have them give their own analysis of it. It's kind of boring hearing the same stuff repeated over and over. It's not like I haven't the stories described in that way before.

Maybe you could do your own radio show? That would be tight.

Oh, and get Edgar Mitchell back on your show, that was the best interview I've listened to... could you have another interview with an astronaut perhaps?

Keep it up!!!


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:23 PM by ashamedamerican
My apologies in advance if either of these have been covered in your shows and I missed it.
I think a few interesting topics would be if NIST could be intentionally lying to us in a manner that makes it easy for us to see through the lies, as I described
here.
And why WTC buildings #5 and 6 didn't collapse as I described here.
And what exactly Larry Silverstein meant by "pull it" which I went into here, it's obvious from the reports that he did mean to demolish the building when he said "pull it."

I think these are all very important topics that don't get nearly enough attention.
I also think we should all try to focus attention on the events of 9/11 as much as possible, we owe it to the families who lost their loved ones on that day, as well as the families who have lost loved ones as the result of wars and policies from that day.

[edit on 15-12-2008 by ashamedamerican]


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:39 PM by Jay-in-AR
reply to post by Quantum_Squirrel



I agree with this post. However, I think it would be critically important not to just jump on whatever is topical at the time. For instance, this thread.

As of my posting, there are only three responses to this thread, yet it is on the "front page" of the site...
There needs to be some kind of positive feedback of whatever is discussed. (not to knock the op of this thread)

Controversy is good, but only if it is honest.

I mean, it would be easy enough to create a thread that was meant to do nothing more than troll for responses in the religious forum, but that would be dishonest.

Therefore, the top three shouldn't get it. It should be something decided upon by the members at large, based on topical quality. Take a vote in advance of each show.
Like normal broadcasts, it would be nice to have your stuff lined up even a couple of WEEKS in advance.

If, and only IF, someone were able to steadily remain at the top of the pages, as decided upon by the members, should there be a member interview... It is still a nice idea to plug the threads and talk about the top ones each broadcast, however. Consider it advertising... Yourself.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:44 PM by Quantum_Squirrel
reply to post by Jay-in-AR



Fair point ...

It would be stupid to have ten pages of trolling of course everything would have to be vetted for suitability .. i still think the crux is member participation on whats hot and whats not.



reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 11:26 PM by Mr Knowledge
It's simple: We either prepare for an economic collapse or create a sustainable, resource-based society not based on money. I hear people talking about this now when I posted this years ago when no one was talking about it or even cared. People thought that the idea of a resource-based society was non-sense. They kept saying, "I don't think it would work". Now they're more curious. They say, "It sounds like a good idea. How will it work?". It's simple. The level of precision with which a plan is executed depends on both sound preparation and correct approaches. Once we as a people realize the goal, we'll work towards making that goal a reality. What we need is a motto that will help remind us what the goal is. Every year, America should have a new motto that sets the collective goal of our society in place. In 2009, our motto should be something like this: "Sustainability Is The Key To Prosperity". We're so closed-minded as a nation, we can't even understand how small, subtle changes can have a huge impact on society. Our government keeps creating and implementing new laws and policies trying to make major changes, when truthfully, its the small, positive changes that create positive results. It's the same way every technology that was ever created came to be. They all started with a simple, subtle idea. So please, let's try to think small before thinking big when it comes to making changes. If one is building a brick house, he or she doesn't begin with the whole house, rather they start brick by brick, with the brick being the fundamental basis and structure of the whole house.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^