I haven't read the book, as I really don't get the impression that it's any different than any of the other "hidden histories" books which reject
actual research and findings (much of which leads to the conclusion of mistranslations, misinterpretations, or outright hoaxes), and instead like to
speculate without much evidence to back them up.
I did, however, watch the video series - which only furthered this perception (lawl @ fossils fuels not being organic in origin). I would like to
comment that many of the "anomalies" he presents as being completely ignored by academia are actually being intensely scrutinized. Albeit, they are
not coming to the same conclusions as some of the more fringe speculators are. For instance, in the video he mentions the Antikythera mechanism and
how it must have been machined with complex lathes and tools. This, actually, doesn't appear to be the case at all. Nor is it anywhere close to being
more complicated than anything we currently have today. (and it was not used for navigation either) While an extremely impressive device,
clockwork/geared devices weren't unheard of back then - even if this one was more sophisticated than we once realized. The device has been linked to
Archimedes, or at least an improvement on his designs, and considering scope of his genius - it's not hard (at least for me) to imagine that he could
have concocted such a device. After all, this is the same man who purportedly built a crane to hoist enemy ships out of the bay and set them on
fire.
Scientists have not been ignoring these anomalies. In fact, one researcher has recently built a reconstruction of the device.
New Scientist - Archimedes and the 2000 year old Computer
Yes, the ancients were much more advanced than we often give them credit for - but it doesn't support the propositions supported by many in the
conspiracy community, and the information certainly isn't being kept from us. It's all out there for you to peruse, should you know where and have
the ambition to look.
Also... in the video he made mention of Romans using concrete. This is true, however, they did not build their temples out of concrete. Recent
discoveries of maritime shipwrecks in the Mediterranean by Dr. Robert Ballard revealed a Roman ship that sunk around the first century AD carrying
part of a prefabricated Roman Temple. It was not constructed out of concrete, but rather of some very large, and VERY heavy cut stone, of which
everything onboard and ready for delivery and construction on-site. So not only did they have a method for simply lifting these extermely stones -
they had sophisticated methods of transporting them across the ancient world.
NYTimes