WTC7 was demolished for the purpose of making WTC 1&2 look like they were demolished also. The more questions and confusion the better, for the perps & coverup planners.


WTC1&2 were intrinstically flawed, bound to collapse exactly as they did...
the quick minded intel mobilized at the opportunity to coverup the massive info on frauds in gold & equities housed in WTC7, & to bring a consensus of thinking that WTC1&2 were also pre-sabotaged to collapse.
A False-Flag of a False-Flag operation as it were

It would be safe to assume that both world trade center buildings, and building number seven, had offices and documents that were blocking, or were seen as an obstacle, of the New American Century plans.

Seems logical to me.

The interesting thing about all of this... why are Americans allowing digital television to proceed?

All this rant about microchips, the Patriot Act, wireless taps, ufo's with no proof, aliens with no proof, the Disclosure Project b.s.....

Where in the hell is the proof PEOPLE????


WHERE IS THE PROOF???????

Why Didn't WTC #5 & #6 Collapse?

Because they were rigged with the Fourth/Fifth generation pure fusion NDEWs with tailor-made yield effects and not with the accompanying thermite/thermate type charges like at WTC 1, 2, and 7.

The design-manipulated, directed, upward, cylindrical linear plasma/blast effects initially started at the base of these towers it seems possible to me from the photos.

Given some other circumstantial evidence (pre-collapse, seemingly ground originated tremor(s), peculiarly burnt/melted vehicles, power-outage), I consider the possibility that the DEW effects believed witnessed by some may not have originated from above.

Just my 'moon-bat' opinion.

That was indeed some great pics and presentation.
The reason #5 & #6 didn't collapse like #7 is because
it was not a controlled demolition like the others.

Originally posted by amfirst
WTC 7 took the major blunder of the callaspes of the twin towers if u examine the videos taken from sky view u will see most of the debris landing on it.

I will examine the videos if you provide the one I am to watch.

Originally posted by amfirst
There was a big hole in the WTC7 before it callaspe.

What side of the building (N,S,W,E) was the hole on? How big is the whole?!

Originally posted by amfirst
A fireman on seen at the time said they evacuated people from WTC7 because the building was leaning and is going to callaspe because of the damage.

Who is the fireman? Where was his statement made? If the building was leaning, which direction was it leaning?! When it collapsed why was there
a level collapse? The collapse did not seem to angle towards some hole
which caused the building to lean? It went straight down.

Originally posted by amfirst
This is so old and been talked about million of times.

You are right it is old. About 7 years old.
Does that mean people should stop questioning what they saw.
It was the first time in history that a building was brought down
by a structure fire. And it happened 3 times in one day.

[edit on 14-12-2008 by amfirst]

I was watching the video and something interesting happened. I clicked to move forward some and it popped up a screen that said "This video is not available. Please check back later."

Originally posted by amfirst
There was a big hole in the WTC7 before it callaspe.

Oh, and there weren't holes in WTC5 and 6? Hell, half of WTC4 was just gone!


Look what WTC4 looked like before the collapses:




Now look at all that was left of it:






Here's an aerial showing WTC5's impact damages:




WTC5 burning: