Why YOU should not want GM bankruptcy, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 07:59 AM by anonymousATS
Originally posted by Animal

Fine don't trust my source again that is your prerogative. Still don't expect me or anyone else to trust your opinion as fact.




I speak only for me. Do you claim to speak for all?






What I said was, to claim that the big 3 make products of no / low quality based solely on your opinion is dishonest.




The US automakers can 'talk' or they can 'do'. When the dust settles, I believe you'll find that US companies are just doing the same old shuffle. Buy some of their stuff if you really think they have anything to offer.

A few years ago, I had a fuel pump go out on a Chevy S10 I foolishly bought. The damn fuel pump cost $350. It was inside the gas tank. An ace mechanic (his day job) said it was easier to pull the pickup bed than to drop the gas tank. More 'quality' from GM. Same old shuffle.




..... Take a look at this site:

Automobile: Green Cr Reviews

Notice the presence of five USA made cars.

Look at:

Hybrid Reviews

Five of the 10 autos reviewed on just the first page are USA made cars.



A U.S. magazine touting U.S. products? I'm not surprised. They would not be in business long if they didn't mention some U.S. products.

BTW, I would not own a Mercedes regardless of what "green" list they made. I was responsible for the maintenance on two Mercedes cars. The engineering was simply bizarre.





They build designs to lock in dealer profits from parts and specially trained mechanics.


"What car company doesn't?"






The fact you think this is a legitimate engineering/management goal is telling.






Diminishing returns guarantees that the future will bring more irresponsible conduct from these mega-corporations. If for no other reason than -- "they have always done it this way".

"Would you care to clarify this for me?"






The US companies say they are circling the toilet bowl -- about to go under. They have failed ....... utterly, completely failed as an ongoing commercial venture. We need to dig a hole, mount a gravestone and let them die a quiet death.

They *will* be replaced by leaner, meaner, responsive companies. Companies with competent management and engineering. The public will be better off for it.




Chrysler should have folded decades ago. Ford and GM should be allowed to fail now. Anything else is nothing more than corporate welfare (loan or not).


"Because it is corporate welfare that they should die? Or are there other reasons? What about the PEOPLE who are going to suffer from their loss? Does helping them count? "






Businesses go under every day. You seem to think that because of the US automaker's size, they should be saved. That to me is bizarre. Essentially you want to feed a cancer on our society.

We need to let these monstrosities die. We will be much stronger in the long run by weeding out these non-competitive corporations now.





[edit on 12/15/2008 by anonymousATS]



reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:13 AM by Animal
reply to post by anonymousATS



Back and forth with you on the issue of the big3's quality (which you raised) has gone no where. You have completely failed to show any legitimate rational for stating the quality of their vehicles is a good rational for their demise.

I am sorry to hear about your gas pump...

Yes they need new management, and of course they are not perfect, but you can not say they do not make quality products because it is clear that today they do. On top of product they have average to excellent warrentie4s, their prices are competitive, and they are working on innovation (hybrids, diesels, and electric).

You can beat around the bush all day and I could stand around waiting for you to actually reply directly to me, but it is fairy obvious that is not going to happen.

Enjoy the box.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:22 AM by Animal
reply to post by DaddyBare



Interesting. I live in New Mexico too and I have no problems with understanding how the loss of the big three is going to affect me and you. Albuquerque has epically low wages for a major city, and for that I am sorry. But do not assume that because you can not get a job that pays as much as a big3 job they should not exist.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:57 AM by Animal
reply to post by anonymousATS



Yopur so silly! once again all you have to offer is your HUMBLE opinion. IO have shown you facts to counter your O
PINIONS and still all you can do is bring back more OPINIONS.

I showed you that USA made cars and now getting HIGH reviews.

I showed you they are building well rated hybrids and diesels.

Yet still all you can do is say "well I know I have owned them, I know".

Well open your eyes mate, just like "Japanese made" being synonymous with crap fading away, so too is the "made in the USA" slowly fading away.

I am sorry it does not fit your perception of reality but it is the fact.

And like I said, Enjoy the Box


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:58 AM by DaddyBare
reply to post by Animal



Don't get me wrong .... I'm retired now and make a comfortable living for my family... what I was trying to say is that other than worrying about if I'll still be able to get parts for my Dodge.... Detroit is to remote to far removed for me to feel an urgent need to help them...

That and with with people no longer being able to take out that second mortgage to buy a new car I think their future is doom regardless of what anyone does!

[edit on 15-12-2008 by DaddyBare]



reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 10:06 AM by jsobecky
reply to post by Animal



Yes, Detroit has made advances in quality, fuel economy, and alternative vehicles. That is good.

But they are still working under a bad business model. Legacy costs will kill them. Changes need to be made in management and labor.

To the person that said they are part of national security, that is true. GM will never entirely disappear; there will always be a market for some of their products.

Maybe they should consider being a specialty manufacturer. Maybe they cannot be all things to all consumers.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 10:31 AM by sos37
Originally posted by Animal
reply to
post by anonymousATS



Yopur so silly! once again all you have to offer is your HUMBLE opinion. IO have shown you facts to counter your O
PINIONS and still all you can do is bring back more OPINIONS.

I showed you that USA made cars and now getting HIGH reviews.

I showed you they are building well rated hybrids and diesels.

Yet still all you can do is say "well I know I have owned them, I know".



You're missing something important here, especially when you just waive this last sentence away as naivate'. You can show me all the data you want stating that the Big 3 has turned around their cars, but the fact remains they have a long, entrenched reputation for building cars that sucked bad. Don't you get it? We're talking about people parting with their hard-earned money to the tune of $20,000+ and they aren't going to simply throw it at GM or Chrysler because they "say" they have turned things around. People want proof, and that kind of proof means a reputation of quality. That reputation is going to take a long time to rebuild. You cannot possibly expect the Big 3 to go from the laughing stock of car makers to the car builders of choice for Amerca overnight. It's an unreasonable expectation.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 12:49 PM by Animal
Originally posted by jsobecky
reply to
post by Animal



But they are still working under a bad business model. Legacy costs will kill them. Changes need to be made in management and labor.


jsobecky I agree with this, they are under POOR management that needs to be done away with. I would push for something along the lines of Structural Adjustment Programs tied to the loans that dictate the types of changes that MUST be initiated for the loans to be made. Specifically I owuld expect new management and a new overall business model that makes these guys more competitive.

Originally posted by sos37

Don't you get it? We're talking about people parting with their hard-earned money to the tune of $20,000+ and they aren't going to simply throw it at GM or Chrysler because they "say" they have turned things around. People want proof, and that kind of proof means a reputation of quality.


I am not saying that they are merely SAYING they build better cars, they DO. The proof is in the pudding. It is not a debatable topic. Yes it will take time to rebuild their image, but it CAN be done.

Originally posted by kozmo
This whole "Loan" thing is bandaid on a bullet wound. The industry is doomed, the patient is terminal and no amount of life-support is going to revive it - PERIOD! I do not want to see more tax-payer money thrown down the drain - PERIOD!


And you base your diagnosis on what? Please tell me where you get the information from that leads you to conclude that this is a failed business that can not be saved. I am not asking for you to show me links to the people who told you this is what you should believe I am looking for real data on why this is a failed industry.

[edit on 15-12-2008 by Animal]


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 02:34 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by kozmo





- PERIOD! I do not want to see more tax-payer money thrown down the drain - PERIOD!

I guess I still haven't make it clear that if they ARE allowed to go bankrupt, it will cost the US taxpayer MORE money, than if they are given the loan. I don't know how much clearer I can be, that GM's retirement plan is covered by the PBGC. For those that are not familiar with it, here is a brief summary of what it is:

BGC is a federal corporation created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. It currently protects the pensions of nearly 44 million American workers and retirees in more than 29,000 private single-employer and multiemployer defined benefit pension plans. PBGC receives no funds from general tax revenues. Operations are financed by insurance premiums set by Congress and paid by sponsors of defined benefit plans, investment income, assets from pension plans trusteed by PBGC, and recoveries from the companies formerly responsible for the plans.


I strongly suggest that those who wish to debate this topic, go to their website and see exactly how they are involved here, by an act of Congress:

www.pbgc.gov...

Although GM has its retiree pool funded for several years, if it were to go bankrupt, many of the present workers would be eligible for retirement payments, and the fund would be quickly overwhelmed, especially since there would be no substantial reduction of retiree pay, since the average now is about $18,000 per year, well below the maximum paid by PBGC.
Therefore, the current retiree cost of about 7 billion dollars per year, would swell to over 10 billion per year, and the PBGC would end up taking over the fund at a cost of $10 billion per year.
Add the cost of unemployment for up to 3 million workers, if all three go out, with the cascading job losses, or 300,000 unemployed if GM goes out, PLUS several hundred thousand more in ancillary job loss, plus LOSS of TAX REVENUE from those unemployed people, and the cost per year of bankruptcy would easily reach $25 billion in new costs to the Federal government, and that doesn't even include the losses to state and local government, in lost taxes, unemployment payments, and welfare of one sort or another.
When people lose jobs in the US, as in most free markets, everyone suffers.

Here is a site that discusses some of the issues regarding the PGBC and the funding issues involved:

gangbox.wordpress.com... er-of-going-insolvent/

I direct you to part of that article:
However, Joshua D. Rauh, associate professor of finance at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, has argued that it’s impossible to know the exact government liability of any potential bankruptcy at the automakers. The United Airlines bankruptcy case, where pension plans were turned over to the PBGC, resulted in far more liability than anyone anticipated. Rauh has estimated that stock market losses, among other things, have worsened the funding gap taxpayers would face if GM’s plans ended up being turned over to the PBGC. Rauh, who opposes a federal bailout for automakers, estimates that a GM bankruptcy could cost taxpayers $23 billion in underfunded liabilities. “When the pension safety net blows a hole in it, then what happens?” asked Samuel J. Gerdano, executive director for the American Bankruptcy Institute in Alexandria, Va. He said 104 public companies had filed for bankruptcy this year through mid-November. That’s up significantly, compared with 78 filings for all of 2007. In general, pension plans could be weaker because some saw startling losses during the meltdown on Wall Street. The total value of pension plan assets for the largest U.S. companies in the Standard & Poor’s 1500 was $1.66 trillion — compared with total liabilities of $1.6 trillion at the end of 2007. That was a surplus of $60 billion. But by the end of November, those funds had a deficit of about $280 billion, according to Mercer’s latest analysis of defined benefit pension plans sponsored by companies in the Standard & Poor’s 1500 index.

The PBGC pays about $4.3 billion annually in pension benefits



Note that current payments are $4.3 billion per year. A GM failure alone would triple that payout per year, once the GM pension funds are gone. At a minimum, premiums for PBGC, which would in essence flow down to the workers. However, also note:

However, most experts say the political reality is that Congress cannot afford to let the PBGC fail and leave retirees in every state without pension checks.

Translation- they would authorize funding with another bailout, paid by, you know who, the taxpayer.

By the way, if you DON'T know anything about the PBGC, and you are eligible for a defined pension plan(not 401K plans). you should check to see if your pension is covered by it,(ask your plan administrator) OR you could wait until retirement, and find out that your pension is gone, and not covered.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 08:34 PM by Animal
reply to post by ProfEmeritus



Thanks for such a clear and powerful explanation of some of the dire consequences of a failed auto industry here in the USA. IF I could give applause I would.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 09:14 PM by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by hinky





Why does it just have to be the good ol' USA that float these guys a payday loan so they can build cars overseas.

Actually, GM is considering that:
by Jonathon Ramsey Oct 24th, 2008 at 9:02AM Filed under: China, GM, Earnings/Financials Big Bob Lutz said that GM declaring bankruptcy is "out of the question." Of course, that was two years ago, when things like a $25 billion government loan would have sounded ludicrous. That was also before the auto industry mess got messier, and in order to stay true to those words today, GM is doing whatever it has to do to find money to stay in business. It heard Chrysler has an $11 billion piggy bank and a couple of jewels (Jeep and minivans) and GM said "Come here, girl! Lemme holla at you for a minute!" Now GM is looking at its own international stable, and has its eye on China as a source of stopgap revenue for its North American operations. We've posted before on the fact that GM's international operations aren't doing too badly, and GM China sold 11.5 million vehicles last year -- more than any other manufacturer there. This year, it expects China sales volume to grow by 11- to 12-percent, and that means yuan in the bank. Lutz said of the China move, "We do not rule out such a possibility under current conditions." These are hard times, but -- just like the good ones -- they're temporary, and GM just needs a little help to get to payday. Using money from one of your branches makes perfect sense to us.


www.autoblog.com...
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 1 days ago with 18 member flags
Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags
Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags
Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags