It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by angel of lightangelo
reply to post by badmedia
So what do you think has so many people still willing to believe in gods in the year 2008 when it is so obviously unscientific? Know what I'm sayin?
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
I look out my door everyday and I see GOD everywhere, that's proof enough for me. I feel sorry for those that don't see Miracles and GOD'S hand in things...
Hope that answered your question - The answer is NO GOD can not be proven scientifically.
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
reply to post by angel of lightangelo
There is more Scientific proof for GOD than Evolution, that is a fact.
Neither can be proven Scientifically
Originally posted by nj2day
Neither can be proven Scientifically
Wow, these two statements in the same post by the same person...
Contradict much?
Originally posted by theindependentjournal
reply to post by angel of lightangelo
There is more Scientific proof for GOD than Evolution, that is a fact.
Originally posted by Incarnated
Thus if you are a created form from the first source and center of all creation then the consciouness of the personality of God would be defined at all collections of a major higherarchy of meausreable electircal "energy" frequencies.
It is written "Let us make man in Our Image", the Image is the conscious mindset. God is known as the great "I AM" shared with the philosopical idealisim as "I think therefore I AM".
Originally posted by Incarnated
Originally posted by nj2day
Neither can be proven Scientifically
Wow, these two statements in the same post by the same person...
Contradict much?
They are not contradictory. As "Proof" the root term in understanding can not be forced upon anyone.