ABC says conspiracy web sites are contributing to mental health issues, page 29

Originally posted by Yoda411
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

Evidence of your bias on the subject matter:

You believe MSM is to blame for linking conspiracy web sites to mental health issues.

Yet ATS is not to blame for the posts in which people contribute to the website.

Yes. I have evidence in my case. One article by MSM that is nothing but opinion and conjecture.

What examples did they give us again?

Somehow you fail to blame the reporter on ABC's behalf and jump directly to the conclusion it is the MSM, an even broader conclusion than if you were to blame ABC.

In the same context, you would therefor blame AboveTopSecret, or it's parent company (if there even is one), for the posts which are on their website.

Just thought I'd point that out because it has had a significant impact on what you have contributed thus far.

Nooooo. You are -again- twisting things to fit what you want to believe. I can blame the MSM for lying because I have an example of them lying. I can also condemn them for the lie since they have no examples of conspiracy websites contributing to any mental illness. How many times did you burn yourself before you learned to stop doing it?

Keep dodging my questions, Yoda. I will just ask them again.

Additionally I will re-state something which was in the original article and is thus far completely overlooked by you.

Whether or not conspiracy theories harm people who are susceptible to mental illness is a matter of debate among psychiatrists.

Exactly. Which is why it is a matter of debate among us here on ATS. We should all stop bickering with "I'm right, you are wrong" ideology on the subject when neither opinions can be conclusively proven to be true.

Opinions can never be proven true.

Then why did you spend so many pages telling me it was "factual?" You said I could quote you on that!

Originally posted by angel of lightangelo

Originally posted by Yoda411
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

Evidence of your bias on the subject matter:

You believe MSM is to blame for linking conspiracy web sites to mental health issues.

Yet ATS is not to blame for the posts in which people contribute to the website.

Yes.

Just thought I would point that out. Being bias pretty much rules you out of the equation since you are no longer able to see both sides of the spectrum.

reply to post by Yoda411

---

I will just pick one random question you never answered out of soooooo many.

You claimed that learning disabilities and mental illness were the same thing. Then I said....

I thought we were talking about mental illness. You know, how you claimed this site made someone kill themselves. Then you went on to say that it is that dangerous because of the conspiracies posted here.

Really? Did he kill himself because of the supposed 2 by 4 on mars, or the shadow people, or was it the glass pyramids on the moon, JFK?. OK, so that is a dead end so you shift and twist. Gotcha.

Let's see if you can answer that instead of twisting some more.

reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

I have so brutally drilled home that it is my opinion, and does not have to be yours.

Additionally your argument continues to reflect the debating style of Kent Hovid, where you twist my argument to suit your needs.

I never said ATS made him kill himself - as you have so incorrectly twisted out of proportion. I said ATS could have contributed in my own opinion, and I currently have no evidence to rule it completely out of the equation.

reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

The obscurity within the study of psychology.

Click here for more information.

reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

What a pathetic attempt at a debate. I like how you went back to change your response to make it appear to be more valid. I'm done responding to your complete ignorance. It has proven to be a waste of time.

Originally posted by Yoda411
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

What a pathetic attempt at a debate. I like how you went back to change your response to make it appear to be more valid. I'm done responding to your complete ignorance. It has proven to be a waste of time.

I did not change it to make it appear more valid. How do you get that? I clarified for you what evidence meant because you have had so much trouble with words so far. You have no argument. You have no case. You have an idea that you want to sell very badly. No evidence that it did not? You have none that it did either though do you? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Yep it is your opinion. Your opinion is based on ignorance and false news report. Nice!

Originally posted by Yoda411
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

I like how you went back to change your response to make it appear to be more valid.

By adding this you mean "EVIDENCE - not opinions "

I sure did go back and do some crazy editing to make my argument stronger didn't I? I really wish I knew why I ever thought you would get it. I am still using words. That has gotta throw ya.

reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

Let's pretend for two seconds that your argument is potentially valid.

You asked, why should we consider this being true?

I answered, the obscurity within the study of psychology.

So I will ask you the same question.

Why should we completely rule out conspiracy websites from the equation?

reply to post by Yoda411

---

Waiting.. Waiting... Waiting...

Oh look! He's offline! Now that's convenient.

reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

Looks like you stuck your foot in your mouth on this one.

Originally posted by Yoda411
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

Let's pretend for two seconds that your argument is potentially valid.

You asked, why should we consider this being true?

I answered, the obscurity within the study of psychology.

So I will ask you the same question.

Why should we completely rule out conspiracy websites from the equation?

Because there was never a reason to include them!

Originally posted by Yoda411
reply to post by angel of lightangelo

---

Looks like you stuck your foot in your mouth on this one.

Cannot see how. Every time that I want to strangle the keyboard, I go away from that thread for a while. That is why I barely check back here now.

My foot is still firmly on the ground. I am glad that you can manipulate the reality of this discussion in such a way as to actually claim what you do. How nice it must be to have that kind of delusional mind. What do you not understand about the difference between something we DO have evidence of and your idea based on an article that was really just someone else's IDEA.

Evidence to show ABC is making crap up. My point.

No evidence to even imagine conspiracy sites do anything to contribute to any mental illnesses.. Your point.

See the difference yet? I am saying something based on evidence that we can all see.

You are saying something based on an article that was based on nothing.

DIFFERENT.

I really wish you would get a dictionary.

Do I have freedom FROM religion?
  Posted 1 days ago with 18 member flags

Is this the only politician in europe that is not blind?
  Posted 2 days ago with 8 member flags

Former NAVY SEAL Rebukes Obama
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags

What The Founding Fathers Thought About Corporations
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags

Newsweek Cover: \'The First Gay President\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags

Westboro Baptist Church
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags

Congress Revolts On Obama Plan That Would Ban ‘Buy American’
  Posted 18 days ago with 3 member flags

Police Pursue 4-Year-Old for Overdue Library Book
  Posted 12 days ago with 3 member flags

Newest topics, updated in real-time:

Newest topics getting flags, in real-time:

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time: