Understanding What A Shift of the Poles Actually Means, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times
Topic started on 12-12-2008 @ 12:36 PM by Rintendo
As I read a lot of these topics being posted I see that there is a great deal of confusion on the subject of what will happen when the poles finally shift.

There is plate movement (plate tectonics) where the actual layers of crust move, and then there is a movement of the earth's poles such as we had almost a million years ago due to a change in magnetism of the minerals that are contained within the earth's magma flow.

Plate tectonics involves seismology and vulcanism. When the magma flow "bumps" a plate, or when a gap in the plate allows for magma plumes to surface you see a seismic or volcanic occurrence. When the polarity of the magma shifts you see an effect in weather. Hurricanes. Tornadoes. Extreme heat and extreme cold. Communication breakdown in the event of severe electrical charging.

Many people believe that the poles will shift in 2012 and are stating that this will cause the earth's crust to move. The way it is being described is a quick shift in the continental structure or energetic plate tectonics. There hasn't been a period (yet) in the earth's history where the plates shifted dramatically and quickly, so I am not alarmed that extreme mountain building will occur.

IF 2012 does bring a shift in polarity, then what we can expect is extreme high and lows in temperature. Super storm systems, and perhaps a new ice age. All this is worrisome indeed, but it is not what a lot of people are predicting. I read a post about what continents to move to as though the "wobble" of the earth will radically reverse and the entire planet will flip quickly and we all better live in New Zealand...or something like that.

Again, my geology knowledge is limited to an undergrad degree so feel free to correct me, but I think we should worry more about an impending ice age than seismic disruption.


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:09 PM by Rintendo
reply to post by drsmooth23



Well, theoretically the poles will be shifting through the next 1500 years, so we can adapt our technology (although I would almost wish for it to be all gone).


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:39 PM by Rintendo
reply to post by Phage



As with all science (including evolution) that occurs over what some estimate to be 4.5 billion years there can be only theories. However, there are prominent geological researchers like Singer and Hoffman who would conjecture otherwise. As my degree was undergrad and I have not spent my life's work engaged in geologic science as they have, I defer to them.

You, however, may disagree. My overarching point, however, was that there won't be this tumultuous upheaval with giant plates shifting quickly, or the earth teetering. At least, there is no evidence to suggest this. When people here "pole" reversal they think it is the actual physical masses of the North and South poles, not the magnetic fields.

EDIT: I am still not a 2012 believer. I happen to think the Aztecs were tired of tapping this calendar into stone and had to stop sometime. Should they have gone on forever with the calendar? I think they stopped at this particular calendar thinking their culture would survive, not anticipating the white man, and would create a new calendar when necessary.

Just at theory...

[edit on 12-12-2008 by Rintendo]


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:50 PM by Phage
reply to post by Rintendo



I only disagree about your linking a magnetic pole reversal with extreme climactic changes. I know Singer and Hoffman (and others) are studying the mechanism of the reversals and nothing about that contradicts what I said, but I'm unfamiliar with the climatic connection.

[edit on 12/12/2008 by Phage]



reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:58 PM by theindependentjournal
reply to post by Rintendo



No Scientist has EVER observed a magnetic pole shift ever. It's a theory and a bad one at that as it would destroy the Earth. They do observe magnetism getting stronger or weaker ONLY, never a reversal of poles.


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 04:01 PM by Phage
reply to post by theindependentjournal



Magnetic patterns in lava beds clearly show the history of magnetic reversals. There is no reason a magnetic reversal would "destroy the Earth".


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 12:20 AM by Phage
reply to post by Toasty



I don't think the animals are entirely reliant on their built in compasses. Pigeons have them but they also use other cues for wayfinding.

It might be rough on the critters but as has been said, the evidence for past reversals shows that they occur over a span of thousands of years.

[edit on 12/15/2008 by Phage]


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 12:26 AM by Toasty
reply to post by Phage



Well if its over 1000's of years, then I guess we will have plenty of time to get used to it. Hopefully you're right about not having to rely on the magnetosphere too much, because I wouldn't want ours to be 'out of service' for 1000 years if it was our only defense against space radiation.

However since its already happened before, and life has seemingly continued to evolve without any noticeable 'jumps' across the millennia, i think we will be ok.


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 01:26 AM by antar
reply to post by Rintendo



I felt a mini shift just reading your OP. There is a spiritual side to this as well. Many people have been being prepped for years and can feel the shifts already from time to time.

Once while a major one I asked to noone in particular, what this is and recieved a sensory anwser which said it is to prepare you for the shifting of the earths axis. The frase had not even been coined yet.

Seriously, there is more to this than just the geological science.


reply posted on 18-12-2008 @ 11:20 AM by Phage
Originally posted by Flux8
Phage, according to our knowledge, how much of ionizing solar radiation is blocked/absorbed by our magnetosphere compared to our atmosphere (ionosphere, mesosphere, stratosphere, cloud albedo, etc.)? I don't mean this rhetorically, but are we pretty certain of this ratio?

I would think if our magnetosphere's field strength/intensity were to diminish for just a few seconds during one of these pole reversals, (let alone minutes, days, weeks, etc.) it COULD put considerable strain on our atmosphere that MIGHT have detrimental effects for just about everything on this planet.

Another question... have there been sudden emergences of new species of plants and animals that correlate with pole reversals in Earth's history, at the evolutionary scale?

I can't give you a percentage. Consider this though; at the magnetic poles there is little protection provided by the magnetosphere but there is no great increase in cosmic intensity in the polar regions at the surface. There is however an increase at high altitudes.

There are charts here
www.research.ibm.com... that provide levels of cosmic radiation intensity at various locations on Earth. For example; the "cosmic intensity" in Calgary is given as 2.63 (compared to New York City, it seems high but the elevation at Calgary is 3,400 feet). At Torreon, Mexico (elevation 3,708 feet) the intensity is 2.20. An increase of 16%. Notice that an increase in altitude has a far greater effect that an increase in latitude.

Unless there were a massive increase in the level of cosmic radiation itself (e.g. gamma burst), the atmosphere can handle the "load".

I know of no studies indicating a correlation between rates of speciation (or mass extinction) and magnetic reversals.
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 8 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 16 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 4 days ago with 133 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 5 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 9 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 6 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 12 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 17 days ago with 73 member flags