America needs to finally adopt the metric system., page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 3 times
Topic started on 12-12-2008 @ 03:38 AM by Totakeke
I know what some people are thinking: "We tried that in the '70s, and it didn't work." or "The metric system is stupid, we can measure fine." or "The metric system is un-American, we can't use it! English system all the way! USA! USA!" I'm hoping to dispel some of these myths and hopefully initiate some discussion.

To begin, a little background on the metric system. It was created in France some three centuries ago (there has been evidence otherwise; France was the first country to successfully implement its version of the metric system) and was based on the Earth, which brings me to my first point:

1 - The metric system is easier
Those in other countries will understand this, those in the United States might not be so familiar. The metric system is based off of the Earth. It was designed to be 1/10,000,000th of the distance from the North Pole to the equator. This way, if you needed to, you could reproduce the meter. It wasn't very practical, but if someone really needed to, it could be done.

That covered length. Now they needed something to measure volume. They made a 10 cm x 10 cm x 10 cm cube and called it the liter.

And that was volume. Now they needed weight or mass. They filled that cube with water and called it the kilogram (due to historical reasons it is the only base unit to have a prefix).

And these are the only base metric units that one would encounter in daily life.

2 - The English system is harder
Let's say you have a distance of 5 miles. How many feet is that? Can you do that in your head in 3 seconds? Maybe, if you're a whiz at mental math. How about inches? It's tougher. What about furlongs? Or leagues? Or fathoms? How about rods, poles, links, chains, or yards? Good luck. And what kind of miles are they? International? Nautical? Statute? We can't even agree on the same mile!

Let's try that again in metric. Say you have a distance of 5 kilometers. How many meters is that? Well, kilo means thousand, so 5 kilometers has to be 5,000 meters. That's all. The only unit for length is the meter, nothing else. There are prefixes that make the meter larger (with powers of 10) or smaller (with negative powers of 10). 5 kilometers, expressed in the 7 most known forms, would be:

5 kilometers
50 hectometers
500 decameters
5,000 meters
50,000 decimeters
500,000 centimeters
5,000,000 millimeters

I'm not even going to try that with miles.

3 - The metric system is un-American!
This one is my favorite, because it is the most ignorant. Most Americans would argue that the metric system is un-America, when the system they use isn't American, but English! Yes, the English brought it over with them to America. The metric system is hardly American. I seem to recall separating from Britain about 200 years ago.

4 - We shouldn't switch because the other countries did! or Why should we use the metric system? This isn't Europe!

Here's a list of 10 things both Europe and the US use
1) Electricity
2) Water
3) Oxygen
4) Automobiles
5) Gasoline
6) Food
7) Decimal currency (yes, the Dollar and the Euro use base 10 counting, the same one you use to count every day)
8) The internet
9) Television
10) A system of government

I could add a lot more to this list. Saying we shouldn't do something because Europe does doesn't really work.

5 - In conclusion
Basically, we need the metric system in America. It is simple, it is logical, and it makes sense. It is the language of science and the language of manufacturing. (In fact, Americans use more metric than they think: 2 liter bottles, 60 watt light bulbs (yes watts are metric, along with volts, ohms, and amperes), kilobytes, megabytes, etc. are all similar to the metric system, pencil lead is metric, etc.)

We are the last country to not be officially metric. Our children would do better in math and science and America could once again be the scientific and mathematically competitive country it used to be.

Questions? Comments?

[edit on 12-12-2008 by Totakeke]


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 04:52 AM by Totakeke

Plus, when two countries collaborate on a project involving engineering for example, it can go tits up due to a mistake in the understanding of the units used. (I have a feeling there was a space project which had faults due to this).


You are exactly right. NASA lost a Mars orbiter in 1999 because Lockheed sent thrust units in English measurements (like the foot-pound or the pound-force, which I think are actually different things ) instead of metric measures. Science is metric. It has no place for feet and pounds. And while no one was placing the blame, everyone knew it was Lockheed Martin.

Anyway, the orbiter drifted way too close to Mars and is either all burned up and in a little pile on the Martian surface or is floating off in space somewhere. The total cost? 125,000,000 USD. I always tell people, "That could've bought a lot of road signs."


Why the hell do you chaps use ounces to measure fluid?! Just use mls or pints ffs!

I vote for milliliters lol. Easier to convert to liters (if you even call it converting, more like shifting the decimal point) from milliliters rather than from milliliters to pints. Or quarts, or gallons, fluid ounces, or fluid drams (we don't use them but just the fact that they exist...)

Oh, this will really drive you nuts. Apparently, we not only have a wet pint and a wet quart, we also have a dry pint and a dry quart lol. And the dry pint and/or the dry quart (at least one) is still being used

[edit on 12-12-2008 by Totakeke]


reply posted on 12-12-2008 @ 03:49 PM by Totakeke

No freak'n way. This is America. If we want to keep our heritage of inches and miles, then we can keep our heritage. Just as the Brits want to keep their Queen of England - we can keep our inches and miles.


It isn't our heritage, it's England's. *gasp* Yes, "our" English system is, in fact, English! Who knew!


You can keep our measurements (Imperial). We still use it; works just fine. I dunno why some Europeans complain, its not that hard to convert between kms and miles... how stupid do you have to be not to be able to roughly convert a number by about one and a half times.


As for converting between miles and kilometers, that is just not an option. We shouldn't have to convert. Does it make sense to use two systems of measurement? Really? And more importantly, does it make sense to use a system that uses so many different bases of counting? (There are 3 feet in a yard, but 16 ounces in a pound.) Converting is stupid. It costs money, makes mistakes, and can (but thankfully hasn't) cost lives. We wouldn't need to convert if everyone used just one measuring system.


The problem with the elitists in Europe who try to force this on Americans is they have no concept of large countries and long distance driving. What sounds further, 1000 miles or 1609 kilometer. Well let me tell you, I wouldn't drive that 1609 kilo-thingy because it just seems further. This same distance between Denver and Los Angles would be like 1 3/4 trips from Paris to Berlin.


Elitists in Europe? Please. First, the metric system is not an "elitist plot" or anything like that. The metric system was made to be simple and easy. Now what's easier, that there are 1000 meters in a kilometer or 5,280 feet in a mile? 1,760 yards in a mile? Etc. Second, it isn't just Europe. Remember, the rest of the world uses metric, which includes Europe, Australia, Asia, South America, and even Antarctica (even though the only people there are scientists, and science is always metric).

I think the rest of the world should use what the leader in technology and what industry we have left, uses. Inches and real pounds work just fine, thank you!


Actually, most manufacturing is done in metric, such as computer processors or things requiring high precision. Could you imagine a 65 nanometer manufacturing process (used in creating computer processors) where, instead of nanometers (which is a prefix combined with the base unit) it said 0.00000255905512 inches? Too difficult.
We should adopt the metric system because it is easier. (Saying you don't know how many "kilo-thingies" definitely shows no knowledge of the metric system.) Furthermore, it doesn't matter how far something "sounds." America is 3,000 miles across or 4,000 kilometers across. Not a big difference.

America cannot be a competitive, scientific, and technologically advanced country if it insists on clinging to an old system of measurement. Honestly? We use a measurement that was (actually probably not) based on a human foot? Could you imagine a world where the foot is different in every town you visit? It would be chaos.

[edit on 12-12-2008 by Totakeke]

[edit on 12-12-2008 by Totakeke]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Give Obama a Break! He Isn\'t All That Bad.
  Posted 4 days ago with 32 member flags
Congress Is Fired
  Posted 13 days ago with 8 member flags
Why are Americans so scared of different Politcal Ideology
  Posted 7 days ago with 8 member flags
Mitt or Barack? - Give me a break!
  Posted 4 days ago with 3 member flags
What Happens When Taxpayers Strike?
  Posted 14 days ago with 2 member flags