Originally posted by Teratoma
If this person is really a 'photographer' (as opposed to just a guy taking pics with a camera), he probably used the highest quality settings, which I believe for this camera produces a picture 2100X1500 pixels. So depending on your screen resolution setting, this pic below is roughly 3 to 4 times bigger than it would be in print. So the little object is really taking up less than one square inch of the pic, not the entire frame. We know that most cameras take pics in the proportions of 4:3. Not square -I doubt this camera is any different.