Teacher tells 7 year-olds Santa's Fake., page 6
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 14 times


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:01 PM by badgerprints
reply to post by MemoryShock



I'm sorry, was my sarcasm a bit over the top?

I think thats the entire point.

That teacher doing the one thing she could really think of to hurt those children was to tell them 'There is no Santa Clause."
What kind of sicko could possibly not see that as over the top?
She said it to shock and hurt them. She said it to unravel their worlds a little bit more so she could take that opportunity to control them.
Who's being over the top and manipulative?

You spend so much time defending your right to slap kids with the truth that you don't even think about when or where you should.

How many folks here think Santa's going to bring them a pony?


Anyone?

See - we all grow out of it
but a kindergarten teacher who uses it as a weapon against children is just sick.

She's got the right to do that though..
its only fair.
It's the truth.
Yaay!


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:04 PM by MemoryShock
reply to post by badgerprints



Copy that...the sarcasm seemed more aimed at the perpetuation of this particular ideology then a focus on how and why truth should be disseminated.

As stated before, I agree that the teacher was out of line and something of this nature should be left to the parents.



reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:15 PM by badgerprints
reply to post by saint4God



Once again.
What if that teacher had told your children that Jesus didn't exist?
I'm not talking about the size of a state.
I'm saying,"Does this teacher have the right to tell your children that their beliefs are false?"

[edit on 11-12-2008 by badgerprints]


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:23 PM by grimreaper797
reply to post by badgerprints



I would have never told my kids that jesus did or didn't exist in the first place. I would have never told them santa existed to begin with. Cuts out the issue of them having to find out from some substitute teacher.

300 years ago you know what the people of that time would call our cellphones, airplanes, and computers? magic. Lets give our children some "magic" to believe it, but let it be something that will benefit them for a lifetime. A story of a man giving stuff out for no reason is not a productive story to be telling children.



reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:39 PM by badgerprints
reply to post by MemoryShock



Seems like we've tangled up a bit. I was actually addressing ole whats his face. He took off.
I support telling kids the truth but there is a time and place.
The teacher is a twit.
She shouldn't get into teaching if hurting kids feelings is her basis for telling the truth.
If she wanted to dispell the santa myth it could have been done with a pamplet or lesson plan. The best time might be in January. Then the kids can mull it over for a year, maybe look into the easter bunny and the tooth fairy. They could read up on congress while they are at it.
You know, maybe they will be the ones to teach us that democracy in the USA is a lie.
Adults have their fantasies too you know.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:48 PM by badgerprints
Originally posted by grimreaper797
reply to
post by badgerprints


A story of a man giving stuff out for no reason is not a productive story to be telling children.


No real argument either way in most of what you said.
The last line was a little off.
There is an underlying moral for giving but it has nothing to do with red suits or reindeer.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:48 PM by grimreaper797
Originally posted by FiatLux
Why take away something that is about love and giving?


Becuase its not. For the kids it is all about the love of GETTING. Getting pleanty of big gifts that is. You think kids would light up if instead of gifts it was community service. The joy of helping somebody else out? Doubt it.

For the parents its all about A. reliving their childhood. Some nostalgia type deal where they want to relive it through their children. or B. an emotional feeling they get from exciting and hyping their child up about christmas, without a single care as to what effects it may have on their children.

Perhaps psychology isn't a strong point for most, but things like this DO have effects, mostly on a subconscious level. These kids DO learn from experience, and what this experience tells them is that when they want something, all they have to do is ask for it, and eventually somebody will give it to them for no reason.

I mean christmas time, heres a bunch of free stuff from santa. Easter, heres free candy and presents from the easter bunny. Halloween, heres a whole lot of free candy from the community

It's intent may be harmless, and you may think you are doing the kid a good deed by showing them a memorable time. In reality though, what you are doing is giving them something for nothing, and thats not a good life lesson.


Is that what you want, a world that is stone cold with little or no heart?


Thats what we got because of things like this. Kids grow up thinking everything will be given to them, and its all about them. You spoil these kids with extravagant holidays, ultimately for your own personal enjoyment of seeing the kids faces light up.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 04:51 PM by grimreaper797
reply to post by badgerprints



What the line meant was "teaching kids this man will give you stuff without any reason" is not a good moral. AKA the theme of entitlement. If the story of santa was "you will only get a gift if you give to others" it would be a little different.

As the tale goes though, its just wait for this guy to give you free stuff, even if you did nothing to deserve it. Lets face it, whens the last time a kid that deserved coal actually got coal for christmas?



reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 05:05 PM by badgerprints
Originally posted by grimreaper797
reply to
post by badgerprints



AKA the theme of entitlement. If the story of santa was "you will only get a gift if you give to others" it would be a little different.


Well,
I think I made the point that Santa wasn't the ultimate moral here.
Giving is a voluntary act of caring or kindness or even love on the part of the individual.

You will only get a gift if you give to others is simply a compulsory rule that dictates the necessity to give in order to recieve.

IT IS NOT ABOUT RECIEVING.

It is about giving with no expectations of reciprocity or even thanks. It is about the idea that we can do good things for others without needing anything back.


reply posted on 11-12-2008 @ 05:08 PM by grimreaper797
reply to post by badgerprints



I said "alittle" different, not completely different or right. At least with the giving requirement, it would teach them to do good, even if it is selfish in reason.

No kid goes "Oh santa, I see. You give to me, without expectations of me giving anything to you because you wish to prove to humanity that giving without expectation is the ultimate act of kindness." These kids aren't plato and socrates, they aren't philosophyu majors, they are 7 year olds. They think "awesome, free expensive gifts! I can't wait to play that xbox 360!"
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 4 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 5 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 4 days ago with 49 member flags