-If you can see Mt Baker from your house does that mean if it blew you would be in danger?
Depends on which way the wind is blowing... depends if it's massive glaciers melt and run down the valleys towards the fraser river.
I would say we would be effected no matter what here in vancouver.. but it all depends.
-How far away are you?
100 km.. as the crow flys.
-Have you noticed anything odd?
well, not really.. I mean, I have seen it vent steam before as I think that the magma is actually not too far below the surface.. but nothing
weird.
since it's clear out today, I will take a peek.
What is normal quake activity like around their, don't those kind of traditional cone volcanoes go off with little warning anyway as the magma
chambers are generally directly underneath and deep - hence movement doesn't always register as a mini quake?
I would agree with that... and with the plate movement going on, it wouldn't take much to pop that cork.
-Also I was looking at a post recently on whether quakes can trigger eruption. I know my dad works in pre-detection so I know a little about this.
I don't see why not.. temporary lava spill or something during/after a quake.. just to settle the new weight placement or some such thing.
-That in mind, if there is activity in the North Pac region, maybe he's looking at the effects on the volcanic activity in the Baker region.
considering the number of volcanoes here in the cascades alone, I wouldn't be surprised. Vancouver/seattle are flanked on all sides by volcanoes.
-That still doesn't account for why they got him out there so rapidly - maybe we should be looking at activity last week - were there any spikes?
Thats the thing.. it's hard to say with the USGS hiding so much info. that's really the big debate..
check out the earthquake prediction thread, we keep alot of that kinda info.




I dont think anyone could have put that better 