Originally posted by redhatty
Considering the entire line that the conversations were taking, who else do you think that "specifically named individual" was?
Identifying who the "specifically named individual" is is not a big leap here.
redhatty I’m not doubting that Blago talked about Obama’s wife, and I don’t think BH was either. What I’m saying is that I don’t see any evidence on those conversations that the Obamas were involved.
What I’m seeing is that Blago was convinced that the Obamas were involved in a “pay to play” scheme, because that would be the only explanation, in his mind, for Obama’s wife to get a corporate job, and his wife, that according to him had alot more experience than Michelle, didn’t.
I’m not saying the Obama’s are innocent, but from these conversations I don’t see anything concrete that would be enough to put them behind bars, as some members apparently have suggested.


Neither did I. I said IF, remember? 
forgive me for my sensitivity. I think it's just that I am about to start celebrating the 22nd anniversary of my 21st Birthday
LOL
