Barack Obama Is Qualified To Be President... Isn't He? (by Jim Marrs), page 8
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 177 times


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:37 PM by Rizen
reply to post by danx



No, I don't really mean you are lazy. Just trying to prove a point...

In fact, I'm sure any intelligent person on this board, like the one that apologized a couple of post up, know that you are top notch in your legal research.

I am just hoping that, the side of you that IS "scared", then prepare at least a little bit.

There is no point in proving you are right (or wrong, maybe in this case) by not preparing a little bit. That would just be stubborn...

We should ALL prepare a little bit for social unrest in CASE this happens. Because ultimately when that happens, we will all forget about this issue, and start a new thread from our bunkers on how to get the WORLD back!!!!





reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:44 PM by jam321
reply to post by marcsnothere



Appreciate the response and I see where you are coming from. I have no beef with Obama. I just want clarity to ensure that our constitution is upheld period. And from what I have notice, Obama doesn't seem too concern. Therefore, if people feel like they have proof, then let them have their day in court to prove it. If the court says he is legit then we move on. If they say he isn't, then we will probably have a few bumps in the road but we will survive and overcome. Ultimately, we have to start demanding that all 3 branches adhere to the Constitution. If they feel changes need to be made then they should do it by passing and ratifying amendments, not by ignoring our Constitution.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:48 PM by n0tsympl
reply to post by danx



agreed, some poeple don't get it tho.... obama is not dead, he doesn't need a hero.

lol, but i'm sure if he could stand up for himself he would



reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:52 PM by jam321
reply to post by Mr Knowledge



How the hell does a President-Elect get into the position with the question of his eligibility based on a birth certificate still at large?


Can you name me one organization or agency that verifies birth certificates besides the states vital divisions?

If I was an employer in Texas and requested BC as part of the process, I wouldn't know what to look for if I got a BC from another state. I would just assume it was legit and move on.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:53 PM by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com



it almost doesn't matter anymore, since McCain is not a natural born citizen either.. check out 7 fam 1100 of state department regulations for more info the whole election was a sham........we need a complete do over with qualified candidates, which of course we'll never get


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:54 PM by danx
Originally posted by DarrylGalasso
I would even accept that; however, nothing is being shown or stated by the SCOTUS,


The Supreme Court only states something when it hears and decides on a case. Since no case has been accepted by the Supreme Court, it hasn’t ruled on this matter. They are not an investigation agency.


I am not trying to fight with you or anyone else in fact I agreed with you in my last post on credible citations; however, surely you must have some questions yourself. If you blindly believe what ANY agent of government says, why are you on ATS to begin with?


Of course I don’t blindly believe in every agency, just as much as I don’t blindly believe in everything that’s posted on the web.

What I do believe in though, is the law, and is exactly because of that that this should be done right.

You are assuming the Supreme Court (and other Courts) rejected the lawsuits because they are covering something up. What I’m saying is: look at the lawsuits, their legal arguments. I have, and frankly I found Mr. Berg’s lawsuit to be a joke for example.

I did however, found Mr. Donofrio’s case to have merit, and I’ve said numerous time before that I wanted the Supreme Court to hear it, so it could be settled once and for all.

But they didn’t. Since we don’t know why they didn’t hear it, I would firstly like to believe that it was because the case lacked some merit, or for some other legal technicality. I have no reason to believe a cover up. At least for now.

And I’m pretty confident that someone will file a serious well argued legal case which the Supreme Court will have no other way but to accept it and finally decide on something this important.

I just can’t expect the Courts to accept every case because I have some curiosity or doubt regarding Obama.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 09:56 PM by jam321
reply to post by danx



Danx, got a question for ya.

Is no merit the same as having no standing?

BTW, you hold your own pretty well. A lot to be admired.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 10:00 PM by jdub297
reply to post by Frankidealist35



HE has produced nothing. A scanned document, that has been called into question by a qualified authority, has been posted on a couple of partisan web sites.

He would not take unlimited funds: lie.
He would end the tax cuts: lie.
He would enact a windfall profit tax on oil: lie
He would promptly end the Iraq war: lie.
He denies talking to Blogejovich, his campaign chief, Axlerod, says he did: lie.

This man has lied throughout his campaign and even after his election. Looks like plenty of reasons to question the validity of the COLB scanned by dailykos.

[edit on 9-12-2008 by jdub297]


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 10:05 PM by danx
Originally posted by Mr Knowledge
How the hell does a President-Elect get into the position with the question of his eligibility based on a birth certificate still at large? This is precisely what makes America a laughing stock. We should just laugh at ourselves because we've become the dumbest nation on the planet and this just confirms how stupid we've become.


When I first started looking into this matter I also had this doubt. How in the hell could we get to this stage and no one checked if the people on the ballots could even be eligible?! After all if they were on the ballots there was a possibility that they might actually win...

This really frustrated me and made no sense. Surely there were rules in place to check this, I thought. But as far as I’ve been able to tell, it’s even more frustrating (and infuriating): there is no federal nation-wide law that demands this to be checked.

Yes this makes no sense, but apparently, a non-“natural born” citizen can run for Office, he just can’t be President (because of the Constitutional clause).

An example of this is Róger Calero, the candidate of the Socialist Workers Party. Calero was born in Nicaragua. He is a naturalized US citizen, just like Arnold Schwarzenegger is, and yet he was on the ballot in 5 states.

What I’m guessing is that some States, through perhaps the State's Secretary, do check or did check because in Calero’s case it was pretty obvious that he didn’t qualify.

But the fact that he was on the ballots in 5 states goes to show that there is no nation-wide law requiring them to check.

edit: spelling

[edit on 9-12-2008 by danx]



reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 10:17 PM by jam321
reply to post by WISHADOW



President-elect Barack Obama should present his Birth Certificate but it seems that it was presented to the officials already.


Who?
When?
Where?


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 10:19 PM by danx
Originally posted by jam321
Danx, got a question for ya.
Is no merit the same as having no standing?


No. Merit is when your claim has a valid basis, supported by facts and the right laws. While standing is whether the plaintiff has any interest or personal stake in the outcome. It means that just because you are citing all the right laws and have all the facts, doesn’t mean you are allowed to sue.

For example, in this case in particular, if John McCain had filed a lawsuit against Obama, and assuming he had presented all the facts that would support it, McCain would have both merit and more standing than anyone else, obviously.

This is why I’m telling people that just because the Courts are dismissing or refusing to hear the cases doesn’t mean there is a conspiracy. It might be for various reasons. They might have found the cases to be meritiless or that the plaintiff doesn’t have standing, or both.

When it comes to Mr. Berg’s case, having looked at his arguments, I found them to be meritless. Regarding Mr. Donofrio’s case I thought it had merit. but perhaps the SCOTUS ruled that Mr. Donofrio didn’t have standing to do so. We don’t know.

Anyway, as I’ve said before, I wish a good case comes along and the Supreme Court hears it, and not just because of this Obama situation in particular, but because I believe it is important that the Supreme Court addresses the definition of “natural born” citizen once and for all.

I mean, if it doesn’t get addressed, it’s only a matter of time that this will happen again.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 10:21 PM by danx
reply to post by DarrylGalasso


You didn’t?

If you didn’t I must have you confused with someone else, and in that case my apologies
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8    9    10    11  >>    ^^TOP^^



Questions about the Aurora Incident, Crash of 1897
  Posted 6 days ago with 2 member flags