Barack Obama Is Qualified To Be President... Isn't He? (by Jim Marrs), page 6


Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 178 times


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:43 PM by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by xpert11



Well that statement is flat out wrong .


Thanks xpert11. I stand corrected, should have phrased that differently.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:43 PM by Maxmars
Mr. Marrs, much respect.

While the essential laws and regulations have been circumvented by the well placed operatives, what is essential I think, is an understanding of what, from a certain perspective, could be the very image of the 'hand' guiding this talented young man into our great American enterprise's CEO position.

Mr. Obama has been touted by many of good things, and also many bad one's. But the complicity required in the purposeful breach of the social contract between citizen and state is well within the margin to be reasonably questioned; "Why?"

I hesitate to consider the possibilities implied by the notion that Mr. Obama could be a man of this character.

But of course, one doesn't rise to the Presidency of the United States alone. It is sort of frightening, the possibility of exactly 'who' is the instrumental operative source of the 'opportunities' which have led him here. What elemental aspect of control is being exposed, theoretically speaking, of course.

Or is it possible that such conspiratorial fugues are mere flights of fancy. Could Mr. Obama be haplessly following a path set for him?

I must say, the case is one of the power of 'belief' vs. the power of guilt. In theory, he has been 'elected', but can't serve.

This "Constitutional" crises scenario could be construed as a planned assault. So many must have known, should have known, should have responded 'proactively', should have reacted publicly. Yet none did. What is that saying about our political 'Parties", and the body politic? Has the corruption reached the point of no return? The Constitution demands otherwise. Yet the rhythm of the drum tells everyone to keep moving forward, eyes front, step in line. For the good of the herd.

[edit on 9-12-2008 by Maxmars]



reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:59 PM by DarrylGalasso
What I see here is still the exact same thing as in every other thread on this subject.

Those who question the BC and those who call them names for doing so.

In the meantime, the powers that be are laughing their behinds off that as predicted, planned, and implemented the people are still divided and cannot unify themselves to stop anything that they desire to do.

Here is how I see this playing out in both scenarios:

1) The courts decide he is ineligible, the result of this; civil war starting with riots that make the late sixties look like a child's game. Implementation of marshal law leading directly to a police state.

2) Nothing is done by the courts and as one of the sources (the Harvard law person with 4 degrees) stated, every single violation of any policy Obama signs, will be challenged in courts across the country and every single one will subpoena the BC as admissible evidence in order to determine the legitimacy of the law they are accused of breaking, thus resulting in a completely gridlocked court system across the nation.

In either case we the people lose. In my opinion, we would be better off going after the people who nominated this man without ensuring his credentials, it seems as though we would stand a better chance with that.

But the ultimate power still lies with us, we control the influx of money that the cash feeding machine called our government needs to survive. The question is in fact will the people of America do something. Refusing to pay taxes will only get us thrown in jail; however, if we all took a week off of work without pay and did not spend any money during that week, I believe that we would make an approximate 100 billion dollar statement to Washington, not to mention that businesses would now answer the call as well as their very survival depends on us spending money or that green garbage they sell off as money. The can make us pay taxes whether or not the law exists; however, they cannot make us go to work and spend our money. The answer is right before our eyes and yet we are blinded to our own power.

I started a thread on this very subject this afternoon, unfortunately there has been only one person that has viewed it, so it will have little if any benefit to anyone.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Merry Christmas to All!

[edit on 12/9/2008 by DarrylGalasso]


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 08:02 PM by CharlesMartel
Barack Obama has not shown wisdom in responding to this issue.

First he posts an unsigned, unstamped certificate that a certificate is on file on
his "Stop the Smears" web site then after the conspiracy theorists get really excited, he removes it. But he still hasn't posted a real birth certificate yet. Not smart.

I assume that he has a passport (from his trip to the Mid East and Germany last summer.

I assume the State Department has a copy of his real birth certificate. Twenty-Seven years ago, my wife tried to get a passport with a certificate like the one Obama provide and was told it wasn't good enough. A judge could order the State Department to produce the birth certificate on file.

I assume that if it were possible to prove Obama wasn't qualified to be President, the Clintons would have done it before the end of the primary season. I don't trust the Clintons with much, but I do trust them to have tried to do that.



[edit on 9-12-2008 by CharlesMartel]


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 08:19 PM by Rizen
reply to post by danx





Yea, that fake one.

Stop using factcheck.org and the fake BC please.

It's wasting time to answer questions over and over again.

[edit on 9-12-2008 by Rizen]


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 08:40 PM by danx
reply to post by argilla11


Just goes to show how credible WND is...

It’s sad that Mr. Marrs, who is undoubtedly a great researcher, would settle for these Internet rumors instead of doing his own research.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 08:42 PM by OrganizedChaos
Originally posted by xpert11
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
If Obama isn’t a citizen then he isn’t qualified to be President, period.


Well that statement is flat out wrong .

Qualified means that a candidate has had experience in areas that will help him/her with what ever job they are applying for . Eligibility is a set criteria that someone has to meet regardless of there qualifications . For example candidate has to be over the age of 35 regardless of there qualifications such as executive experience they have .

Originally posted by OrganizedChaos
Most people would assume that when you are born on a US Military Base that would equate to US Soil. I fully understand this has been debated before.


Umm no I think that you would find that US embassies not US military bases are American soil .


But the US Senate still voted on, and approved a resolution declaring him to be a Natural Born citizen making him eligible for POTUS.


Now why in the world would have given Congress that kind of power that contradicts the eligibility criteria they set out ?
This is getting more ludicrous as we go along .


No such 'Official' action has been taken regarding Obama, even after the SCOTUS conferenced on this issue on OUR dime.


Any judge who understands the US constitution on what is presumable a school boy level would have thrown out McCain eligibility in about five minutes . Instead the courts time has been wasted by a bunch of crack pots .

Look I'm not what you would call call a natural born NZ citizen . I gained my NZ citizenship from one of my parents . Since I was born in Perth I was not born on NZ soil . McCain almost certainly gained his US citizenship from one of his parents otherwise he would be a permanent resident .

Americans tend have a deserved reputation for insular but I never took some of them as being this dumb .

[edit on 9-12-2008 by xpert11]


I never said that US Bases abroad were US Soil. I said most people would ASSUME they were. Understand the difference? Believe it or not, the majority of Americans are not constitutional scholars, like so many here at ATS.

Older Americans consider him a war hero and MOST people wouldn't have questioned his eligibility. But instead of posting something to the internet, the Senate passed a resolution declaring their opinion that he is a natural born citizen. Binding or not.

The real disservice to the American people is that 'Natural Born' has never been clearly defined in the context of our Constitution. That's why the debate rages on.

I didn't vote for either Obama or McCain, but as a narrow minded American I have the right to question an elected officials eligibility and it appears I'm not alone!


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 08:48 PM by Rizen
reply to post by danx



I will if that's what makes you happy. I think the ObamaNation people just like to say that YOU are right, and WE are wrong. WE are right wing for even questioning this, and YOU are just bi-partisan in your response. That is false.

WE, just want the truth, it could be McCain as President Elect now, and WE would still raise this question. WE just want justice. WE were not Bush supporters, or Right in any kind of Wing. We just want the truth.

WE will also go away if and when he lets us see the real BC, because we have no problem with Obama or being in the Obama-nation. We have a problem with this little piece of paper though, because this little piece of paper SYMBOLIZES something very dear to OUR hearts, and that is truth and justice.
Pages: <<  3    4    5    6    7    8    9  >>    ^^TOP^^