Barack Obama Is Qualified To Be President... Isn't He? (by Jim Marrs), page 5


Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 178 times


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 06:37 PM by donwhite
reply to post by bmxkeeler





Coming from Jim Marrs I'm surprised I read it. Didn't anyone see the copy of his birth certificate he had posted on his site?



It’s really too much of a reach to argue whether Obama was or was not born in Hawaii. His BC has been on the website for more than one year. He has the abbreviated BC commonly used today to deny anyone (too nosy) the particulars about the parents that are unnecessary to establish the birth of the subject of the certificate.

The only genuine issue in the recent presidential campaign was whether John McCain was constitutionally eligible to the office of president. His BC has also been posted on the internet. With it or without it we have always known John McCain was born in Panama. But there remains ONE issue. Was he “natural born” as required by the US Con? Or just an American citizen. See Note 1.

This fine distinction is frequently avoided by asserting HE is a citizen of the US without actually using the key words “natural born” as if there was NO distinction between the TWO categories. But there is a real difference. In the original document the terms - citizen and natural born citizen - are both used.

Article 1 is the legislative branch article. In section 2, and clause 2, members of the House must be age 25 and have been a citizen of the US for 7 years. This means any immigrant who obtains his citizenship can be a representative after 7 years.

In section 3, clause 2, members of the Senate must be age 30 and have been a citizen of the US for 9 years. Again, this means any immigrant to the US can be a senator if he obtains his citizenship and waits 9 years.

Now we come to the crux of this over-long story. Who can be the president of the US?

Article 2 is the executive branch article. This one is different from the first two. Let’s look at the part which is different. In section 1, clause 4, it opens with the plain words saying “NO person except a natural born citizen shall be eligible to the office of president.” further in the clause it also specifies age of 35 and 14 years a resident within the US. This means NO immigrant regardless of his obtaining citizenship can be president.

Did the framers of the Constitution mean to make the office of president special? Yes, no doubt about that. They wanted a guy who was BORN in the United States and no one else. This is the only office under the US Con that requires birth in the US.

And one more proof the writes knew the difference in 1787 and that nearly 80 yeas later nothing had changed. Look at the 14th Amendment. Section 1. All persons born OR NATURALIZED in the United States . . are citizens . . . “ Again, I left out the excess for this argument.

In John McCain’s case
, the question is this: Is Panama the United States? And even a 5th grader knows the answer is NO!

References
Article 1. Section 2, Clause 2.
No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five years, and been seven years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state in which he shall be chosen.

Article 1. Section 3, Clause 2
No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty years, and been nine years a citizen of the United States and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state for which he shall be chosen.

Article 2. Section 1, Clause 4
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

Amendment XIV
Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.


Note 1.
The Congress has full power to make rules for citizenship as found in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4. “To establish a uniform rule of naturalization . .

Congress has rightly so, enacted laws making any person who is born of American citizens OUTSIDE the United States while they are serving the United States a citizen of the United States from the date of his or her birth.

Congress can make you a citizen, but only GOD can make you “natural born.”


[edit on 12/9/2008 by donwhite]


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:06 PM by YourForever
www.snopes.com...

A birth announcement for Barack Obama Jr. was also published in the Honolulu Advertiser on 13 August 1961, reporting a 4 August 1961 birth date for the child of Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama:




reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:17 PM by danx
Originally posted by sos37
The fact is, two illegal 13 year old immigrants can parachute into America, give birth the moment they hit the ground, and that child is an American citizen.

I expect you have been hearing complaints for years about this fact.

So there is no problem about the son of an American citizen and a legal immigrant, born in Hawaii in 1961, being a natural born citizen, because he was a citizen the moment he popped out without needing any law to make him so.


That might be the law now, but what about back when Obama was born? Obviously it's changed with the passage of time.


So you didn’t actually read the threads that you say you did and that allegedly made you accuse me of being “an unrelenting left-winger”, did you?

Because if you had you would know the answer to that question, since me and others have addressed this numerous times.

In 1898, in the case
US v. Wong Kim Ark the Supreme Court ruled that Wong Kim Ark, who was born in the US to two Chinese parents, was a US citizen at birth, and the federal Government couldn’t take away his citizenship, even though at the time there was legislation (Chinese Exclusion Act) that specifically prohibited persons of the Chinese race to become US citizens or even coming to the US.

So to answer your question, it has always been perceived that someone who is born in the United States (except children of diplomats), regardless of the nationality, citizenship or even legal status in the country of the parents, is a US citizen at birth.

It was like this in the 1800s, in 1961 and it is like this now.



[edit on 9-12-2008 by danx]



reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:17 PM by Kailassa
Originally posted by AboveTopSecret.com

"When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, 'This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,' the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives. Mighty little force is needed to control a man whose mind has been hoodwinked; contrariwise, no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything—you can't conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
--- Robert A. Heinlein, If This Goes On, 1940


Hawaii only issues one type of birth certificate, and that is the Certificate of Live Birth which we have all seen posted. Obama's birth certificate states he is born in Hawaii, and the information on the COLB is obtained directly from the vault copy.

The pixilated blogger on Youtube calling himself Polarik is not a credible "document expert," as we know neither his name nor his credentials.

Or, perhaps George W. Bush was right when, according to several credible accounts, he described the Constitution of the United States as "just a goddamned piece of paper."


This is typical of the misleading and unsourced information found in Marrs' article.

No account of Bush saying this was credible. There was only one original account; a blogger with a reputation for making things up, who would not name any sources.
All the other references to this outrageous "quote" link back to this one thoroughly untrustworthy attention-seeker.


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:31 PM by danx
Originally posted by OrganizedChaos
Most people would assume that when you are born on a US Military Base that would equate to US Soil. I fully understand this has been debated before.


Yes, it has, and it has been demonstrated that US Military bases abroad are not part of the United States within the meaning of the 14th Amendment. A person born on a Military base abroad does not acquire US citizenship by reason of birth.


But the US Senate still voted on, and approved a resolution declaring him to be a Natural Born citizen making him eligible for POTUS.


Are you talking about
this Senate Resolution?

It’s a non-binding Resolution, it holds no legal value whatsoever. Furthermore, Congress can’t declare someone a “natural born” citizen.


I want to see some closure to this as badly as anyone else does. The way I see it, and the way Obama the lawyer should see it, is the fact that there is Reasonable Doubt regarding his status as a Natural Born citizen.


Obama the lawyer studied and taught Constitutional law. I suspect he knows what he’s doing.



[edit on 9-12-2008 by danx]


reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 07:41 PM by xpert11
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
If Obama isn’t a citizen then he isn’t qualified to be President, period.


Well that statement is flat out wrong .

Qualified means that a candidate has had experience in areas that will help him/her with what ever job they are applying for . Eligibility is a set criteria that someone has to meet regardless of there qualifications . For example candidate has to be over the age of 35 regardless of there qualifications such as executive experience they have .

Originally posted by OrganizedChaos
Most people would assume that when you are born on a US Military Base that would equate to US Soil. I fully understand this has been debated before.


Umm no I think that you would find that US embassies not US military bases are American soil .


But the US Senate still voted on, and approved a resolution declaring him to be a Natural Born citizen making him eligible for POTUS.


Now why in the world would have given Congress that kind of power that contradicts the eligibility criteria they set out ?
This is getting more ludicrous as we go along .


No such 'Official' action has been taken regarding Obama, even after the SCOTUS conferenced on this issue on OUR dime.


Any judge who understands the US constitution on what is presumable a school boy level would have thrown out McCain eligibility in about five minutes . Instead the courts time has been wasted by a bunch of crack pots .

Look I'm not what you would call call a natural born NZ citizen . I gained my NZ citizenship from one of my parents . Since I was born in Perth I was not born on NZ soil . McCain almost certainly gained his US citizenship from one of his parents otherwise he would be a permanent resident .

Americans tend have a deserved reputation for insular but I never took some of them as being this dumb .






[edit on 9-12-2008 by xpert11]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^