AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

This topic is in the ATSnews.com discussion forum.  (rss)


CONS: Barack Obama Is Qualified To Be President... Isn't He? (by Jim Marrs)


<<  26    27    28    29    30  >>



reply posted on 13-2-2009 @ 11:10 PM by darkclaw1256


Obama had a harsh childhood. We should give him the benefit of the doubt. Although sometimes while examining his background history, I feel something isn't right, I feel it's a good change from the former Presidents with all the secrets they keep. Hey, maybe even Obama will reveal UFOs to us after all these years!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-2-2009 @ 11:50 PM by Decoy


re US Pres Obama,
That guy knows I'm calling from Canada and I still receive emails from either himself or top advisers since his mid-stint to become the Dem Presidential Nominee.
There's respect and class, but he's risen above those simple words, I feel.
Decoy



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 11:41 AM by spacial


you can tell the opposition are really reaching to the low end of the barrels when they come out with stuff like this.

laughable.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 12:13 PM by kozmo


Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage

The constitution doesn’t support any such “panel” you’re proposing. Hm, who’s ignoring the law of the land here?


No offense, but you're... what? 12 years old!? The Constitution lays out VERY definitely what is required to be President. Any reasonable presumption that any of those requirements are in violation should require a full redress of grievances - also required by the Constitution.

Don't worry - the adults will handle this.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 02:40 PM by southern_Guardian


Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage

The constitution doesn’t support any such “panel” you’re proposing. Hm, who’s ignoring the law of the land here?


No offense, but you're... what? 12 years old!? The Constitution lays out VERY definitely what is required to be President. Any reasonable presumption that any of those requirements are in violation should require a full redress of grievances - also required by the Constitution.

Don't worry - the adults will handle this.


Whos acting like the adult here? The one throwing around insults like yourself?

Yes the constitution requires the president to be a natural born, and thus the president satisfied those terms in the constitution, satisfied the laws, satisfied state heal officials and the majority of the american population. The people Obama cant seem to satisfy are the people that will hate him regardless... like yourself. So, its pritty much pointless having a reasonably debate about this because you will always dislike the guy. You allow your own biasness to overtake common sense on this birth cert conspiracy.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-3-2009 @ 01:28 PM by Iamonlyhuman


I seriously wish I had a time machine and could travel back about 5 years ago. I'd definitely take a trip to Hawaii and Kenya, get copies of documents and just hold them. Geesh.... imagine what they'd be worth to TPTB today!!



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 3-3-2009 @ 07:04 PM by BFO


Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by AboveTopSecret.com



I can think of one reason Barack Obama would want to seal his birth certificate - the existence of perinatal health conditions which might be embarrassing to the President-Elect.

For example, a punctilious physician might enter whether or not genital abnomalities (for instance, hypospadias) might have existed in the infant, or whether or not the mother suffered from conditions that might have complicated the birth - such as presence of a few diseases about which Obama might have felt his opponents would have made hay. A positive VDRL, for instance. .


NONE of that would be on any valid birth record. Nothing of that nature is what he hiding. Those kinds of things are NOT even available to the person in question. THOSE kinds of birth data are highly confidential and NEVER disclosed on a birth certificate.

So, let's get real. Here, refute this:
www.youtube.com...



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 6-3-2009 @ 01:20 AM by INTELDEZINE


this is change you can believe in...........the change has begun..wait watch listen and see..



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-3-2009 @ 02:02 AM by Spectre0o0


reply to post by southern_Guardian



southern guardian...i have asked you before to show the documents that qualify him. you ignore me on this. i need a link that shows anything he claimed was transparent.
all you do is make claims without backing them up.
put up or shut up.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-3-2009 @ 02:12 AM by whoshotJR


With everything going on in the world this is what people are still focusing on? This is like that joke racing in the special Olympics, even if you win your still retarded.

Obama can be an alien at this point and I wouldn't care. We had a vote and he won by a landslide and even with how stuff is today I'm betting he would still win by a landslide so the "people" have chosen him. As far as the legal process goes there has been proof provided he can legaly be president. You can debate this proof forever but it wont matter because he will still be president and we will still be in a world of hurt with the economy and on the brink of world war.

This topic really needs to just find a rock to crawl under and never be seen again. There is much better angles to shoot at if you hate obama. This is not something you will win and has been discussed at length with documentation.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 9-3-2009 @ 02:19 AM by Britguy


It's not just a question of whether Obama is qualified but rather are ANY qualified? What exactly qualifies anyone to be the country's leader?

The Obamas, Clintons or Bush's, Blairs or Browns of this world are mere political talking heads, allowed to be where they are by kissing the right butts and doing the bidding of the big money interests.
Even at the lower levels of government, the leaders are surrounded by an array of consultants from big business and academia, advising them on all policy issues. The Presidents / Prime Ministers we get are just slick talkers, nothing more, and they'd all screw us over big time to get to the top. That's the nature of career politicians, they don't really care about who they tread on, as long as they get to the top of the pile.

So, questioning Obamas competence to lead is meaningless as he's not the real power anyway. All the partisan bickering is merely to keep us all from uniting and demanding close scrutiny of the entire system. In reality it doesn't matter who is at the top as they are only there because they are allowed to be by the big boys behind the scenes.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 11-3-2009 @ 05:30 PM by crimvelvet


reply to post by whoshotJR



If Obama is NOT qualified then any laws he signed into power "ARE NOT LAW" that is why this question must be settled.

It is not about rebooblicans raising a dust, it is about whether we have a legitimate government. If thousands of citizens question his right to command troops or sign laws then he has to establish he has that legitimate right.

If ONE person at some future date, say twenty years from now, challenges a law signed by Obama and gets it in front of the Supreme Court, ALL the laws he signs could be declared void. That is the true problem here.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 04:24 AM by Southern Guardian


Originally posted by Spectre0o0
reply to post by southern_Guardian



southern guardian...i have asked you before to show the documents that qualify him. you ignore me on this. i need a link that shows anything he claimed was transparent.
all you do is make claims without backing them up.
put up or shut up.


He has, his short form which has been verified by the hawaii state government and health officials. They have also confirmed his long form, however thats insignificant as in Hawaii law the short form of the certificate is the certification of the long form and cannot be any different. The short form is what 95% of americans refer to as their birth certificate and what many fringers are crying about now

Now you tell me why Obama isnt legally eligible to be president or "shut up. The majority of the country, the Hawaiian officials and health officials, Obamas two largest opponents have moved on and have not challanged this garbage..... all we have now are the rightwing fringe who hate Obama regardless of what he does.

Now where legally isnt Obama eligable to be president? The burden of proof lies on the fringers so "put up or shut up."



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 04:27 AM by Southern Guardian


You know what the only real differences between the long form and the short form certificates are? Stuff like how you were born, what color your ass was at birth, weight at birth etc.... I mean seriously who uses that as ID let along wanting to see Obamas??



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-3-2009 @ 04:34 PM by rapinbatsisaltherage


reply to post by kozmo



Kozmo you may want to pay attention to the actual conversation you reply to. I was not discussing natural born citizenship, I was discussing a panel one member proposed in which no reasonable evidence was needed, clearly the constitution does not state that one can evoke such a circumstance without proper precedent and I’d like to see you quote where it does if you’re going to claim I’m wrong. By the way, most adults don't jump into conversations unless they've actually comprehended the discussion, are you by chance projecting your own youth insecurities onto me? Cheers.

[edit on 12-3-2009 by rapinbatsisaltherage]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 21-4-2009 @ 11:23 AM by FlyersFan


Blog Here

Interesting blog. "Why I care about Obama eligibility issue. "

Yes, it's WND .... but the author makes some great points.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 22-6-2009 @ 07:33 PM by Trekscribbler


Brilliant piece (as always), Jim. Level-headed and objective. Appreciate the facts.



   copyright & usage 


<<  26    27    28    29    30  >>





























































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.128 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.