Economic snags
There are potential barriers to New Energy for America, Hines noted. The new presidential administration will face a difficult economic situation that
could curtail the plan, and expensive government programs will be hard to enact as a recessionary economy cuts into tax receipts. “It is likely that
the RPS will be passed during 2009, which will provide a strong boost to U.S. demand for solar energy,” Hines predicted. “The other provisions,
which require significant spending or tax incentives, might have to wait until the economy starts to recover.”
www.70news.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
[edit on 9-12-2008 by digimedia1742]
Obama and Alternative Energy for U.S. !!!, page 1
privacy
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 9-12-2008 @ 06:50 AM by digimedia1742
www.70news.com
Related News Links:
70news.com
[edit on 9-12-2008 by digimedia1742]
Obama and Alternative Energy for U.S. !!!
www.70news.com
Stamford, Conn. - As president, Barack Obama could usher in a new era of solar energy development in the United States, but he will...(visit the link for the full news article)
Related News Links:
70news.com
[edit on 9-12-2008 by digimedia1742]
reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 08:23 AM by network dude
reply to post by digimedia1742
Just my opinion, but the main reason we have not switched to an alternative energy is that our economy would colapse if oil was no longer of high importance. If hydrogen was the way to go and within two years there was an infrastructure in place to deliver the fuel to consumers, big oil and all those who profit from it would be over. But what better time to shake things up? The economy is already quite shaky. If Obama is about change, this would be a mighty big one to start with.
Just my opinion, but the main reason we have not switched to an alternative energy is that our economy would colapse if oil was no longer of high importance. If hydrogen was the way to go and within two years there was an infrastructure in place to deliver the fuel to consumers, big oil and all those who profit from it would be over. But what better time to shake things up? The economy is already quite shaky. If Obama is about change, this would be a mighty big one to start with.
reply posted on 9-12-2008 @ 10:39 AM by guliver
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by digimedia1742
Just my opinion, but the main reason we have not switched to an alternative energy is that our economy would colapse if oil was no longer of high importance. If hydrogen was the way to go and within two years there was an infrastructure in place to deliver the fuel to consumers, big oil and all those who profit from it would be over. But what better time to shake things up? The economy is already quite shaky. If Obama is about change, this would be a mighty big one to start with.
That is what they want you to think! Check out woodgas and have several "backward" nations are using coconut husk and selling the remaining carbon to all water filter companies. All this and free electricty while running the generators with woodgas. Again just another opinion.
Pages: ^^TOP^^
The Above Top Secret Web sites are a
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.051 seconds
wholly owned social content community of
The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on
user-generated content from our member contributors.
The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership
who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides
a collaborative venue for free expression.
ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Header data: 0.002 seconds
Page processed in: 0.051 seconds
