It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GamerGal
BTW JSO, I don't think making blacks and women 3rd class humans counts as supporting civil rights so no, they don't. it's the "evil" liberals that supported the civil rights of every one.
Originally posted by xmotex
Gays serving openly in the military is essentially a done deal, the horse has left the barn - debating it is pointless now.
Originally posted by rightwingnut
How afraid are some to see the abnormal use of the human body and to understand that these particular human beings need counseling?
Originally posted by crmanager
But if a person is romantically inclined to you then you want them away from you. If two peopel of any type are involved romantically then they DO NOT belong on a battlefiel together. Ever.
Originally posted by sos37
When you sign up with any of the armed forces, you are no longer an individual when on Uncle Sam's time - you become a soldier.
Originally posted by sos37
Your contention that a gay soldier who dies in combat ought to be respected as "gay" is a load of crap.
Originally posted by sos37
But the Constitution makes no blanket statement about the rights of people based on sexual orientation,
Originally posted by jsobecky
Those kind of characterizations put people on the defensive, and their responses reflect it.
Originally posted by GamerGal
You are calling gays, lesbians, and bisexual people insane? WTF? This is so so so wrong! Being Gay is NOT a mental illness!
It even happens in the wild! Almost as if its... NATURAL!
BTW JSO, I don't think making blacks and women 3rd class humans counts as supporting civil rights so no, they don't. it's the "evil" liberals that supported the civil rights of every one.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by jsobecky
Those kind of characterizations put people on the defensive, and their responses reflect it.
Were my "generalizations" inaccurate? I don't think so...
Originally posted by GamerGal
reply to post by BlueTriangle
And guess what? In 1953 killing black people in the south wasn't a real crime. In 1803 killing a Native American wasn't a crime. In 1030 killing a Jew wasn't a crime in most of Europe. So I guess today we should be allowed to kill blacks, Native Americans, and Jews because in the past it wasn't considered a crime in one place or another.
Next, bipolar is natural? I thought that was already proven to not be natural but a disorder, not like Homosexuality which is natural.
Next "How does denying the right to marry impact civil rights?" If one person can do it and not another, that is discrimination.
Originally posted by toochaos4u
Memoryshock this is a good post and very true to the word. You forget one thing though (as have I lately) and that is society moves in baby steps.
Originally posted by dbates
If there were some benefit to being a homosexual, the Army would be the first one to embrace it. You can bet your life on that.
Why do they need the marriage license?
Why do we need to encourage homosexuality? People can do this if they wish but there is no merit to encourage it.
Originally posted by dbates
Let's play a question game...
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Why do people accept their risking of their lives in combat and have to fight what is essentially a non issue?
Originally posted by dbates
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Why do people accept their risking of their lives in combat and have to fight what is essentially a non issue?
I hear the same argument about drinking under 21. People can risk their life, shoot .50 caliber machine gun, or command a tank so they should be able to enjoy a beer.