It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why do the viewers have to hide.
Obviously the material was considered illegal.
none of you here can absolutely show without any doubt that it would not have gone further than it was.
Originally posted by RFBurns
Now can ANY of you honestly say that none of you would eventually get tired of watching that same movie so many times? Does it mean that eventually, the movie will be changed to something else because the previous became boaring after seeing it again and again?
Originally posted by ANNED
It makes this case look like a setup just to convict this person on something for other reasons then these cartoons.
like a vendetta against this person
Originally posted by RFBurns
Quite frankly, anyone who MUST see naked cartoon characters really needs some psycological help.
Something wrong up there in that brain bucket. (do I hear echo's?)
Originally posted by Discotech
Yet more Irrational alarmist PC moonbats dragging society down the crapper.
Considering America is supposedly the land of the free every news report I hear coming from there makes me think the opposite.
The United "Socialist" Kingdom is even worse though thanks to these narrow minded self obsessed nutjobs who seem to want to ban everything they don't agree with or lack the intelligence to comprehend
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
reply to post by RFBurns
But I don’t see any legality behind that. Child porn is punishable by law because it depicts actual children in sexually graphic pictures. The law does not police our thoughts, yet. Unless his fake porn somehow proved he had the intent to purchase or be in possession of real child porn this doesn’t seem legally sound.
Edit: Also the same could be said about fiction stories. Do you think stories with underage characters engaging in sexual acts should be illegal if the message conveyed is the one that worries you in this instance?
But, it also begs the question about owning things like Manga and Anime from Japan, which can feature underage stuff. Their rules and societal norms seem much more lax with regard to sexuality than in some other parts of the world.
That said, what's the hubbub about with non-real "child pornography"? Well, the rationale is that promoting child porn promotes the actual abuse of children or contributes assistance (monetary) to those who abuse children. Thus it's bad.
Spencer Elden, the underwater infant pursuing a dollar bill on the cover of 1991's "Nevermind," is doing swimmingly these days, having graduated a year early from a Los Angeles-area high school. Being the "Nirvana baby" -- as Elden calls himself -- has been profitable. Now 17, Elden says he was paid $1,000 to re-enact the famous pool pose for photographers. Compare that to the original shoot, which paid $200.