Originally posted by questioningall
OH by the way - how are you going to debunk those cloud formations in Washington, or did you bother even looking at them? So that then means,
everyone who posted in PNW - was telling the truth in their post - right?
So then everyone else in the post above was not?
Well Firstly Question All well done for putting the time and work into this. Whether you are right or wrong you have the courage to speak your truth,
and stand by your opinion which I admire in people.
Unless of course the opinion or "truth" the person holds, is grasped to even though evidence and Proof that it is wrong is presented to them and
they ignore it as it does not fit their world view.
So the Quote above, Please that is just Lenticular clouds just because many state "I have not seen that before", does not mean its not just
I have never seen a Giant Squid underwater, If I did see one it would still be a Giant Squid and not an alien life form, not matter how much I banged
on about it... so Lenticular Clouds:
A lenticular cloud is relatively rare
But that does not mean it has anything at all to do with Earthquakes, and especially their predictions!
Now on one of your threads I even posted a You Tube Video showing the Lights and strange Sky Phenomina associated with earthquakes, which are observed
many times and known... but really Lenticular clouds?
Edu Lenticular Clouds Warren Wilson
It is the lens-like stack of clouds in the center of the above photo. Notice the contrasting appearance of the lenticular cloud with the puffy
cumulous cloud in the lower center. The lenticular cloud is formed in the wake of winds blowing over mountains
Pics of them over other mountains like Rainer can be seen :
San Diego Mountains
Etc and Etc!
Now for the rest of the research, you really should be taking the following into account.
The prevelance and talk generally about an Madrid event, within the press and pop culture, and recent science documentaries. These things have
heightened people in the area to notice things, and look for patterns where they were not before.
As opposed to Calif etc where the population has become desensitized to such News, warnings and Fears. They have heard many people there since
childhood that a Big one will one day happen, not a possibility, but will happen. Its normalised.
Lifestyles and socio economic factors are important too, and current events e,g, Californians I am sure have enough to worry about with the recnt
fires etc.... Has much happened in the Madrid Area recently?
Whats the talk of the towns now in the coffe shops and bars about the area, with the recent press and hype as mentioned above, the novelty and newness
I bet many talk about the Madrid fault, but go to LA or Calif and I am pretty sure you would have to go to many establishments before you found
someone talking about the Big One.
Even though Scientifically and historically it is more likely to happen in Oakridge NOW on a 8-9 scale than a 7 in Madrid over the next 10 yrs.
In Calif maybe those who would post are at the beach or out and about as is the lifestyle, but in the Madrid area many may be isolated and keen to be
on the net, with the factors already outlined this is their topic of choice.
So these are important factors.... very, before you can postulate your "research" has any validity.
However I am just bringing this to your and the readers attention, I do admire as I said your time, belief and work on this, but I feel you need to
understand real research, and be thinking a little bit out of the Box of inevability you seem to be in, Before you keep posting these threads on these
future events, especially with such grave Headlines to the OP!
You would also have to take into account the data set of the members geographical locations in the population of ATS in the US, and the actual times
those members have been online visiting when these were posted. To make it really specific and accurate as well you would need to know the
Geographical Location of the ATS members who visited your posts, and just read them, against who read and responded to get anywhere near a vague data
set of reliability.
Now these things IMHO make this a weak "WARNING" thread.....
But But.... as the Webots, and that Map showing the posted data, even if the data is unrelaible as shown, is interesting so I am not knocking it
entirely, just hoping to bring some perspective and honesty to this...
Oh and before you make such a strong case again, make sure ALL of the Tenets (eg lenticular clouds over mountains lol) are strong to stop the rest of
your case being ridiculed.
Having said that due to the Map even though poor data, and backed by my belief in "something" to the web bots though I am not quite sure how much,
or reliable or even self fulfilling, both in typed words and other ways too.. (I would love to see them run for 1 yr with no published results then
historically look back)...... well a S+F from me.