It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
calcium hydroxyapatite (the essence of all mammalian bone), its parts are configured "naturally" (not cobbled together or in any other way hoaxed), and it presents numerous physical anomalies that do not conform to standard skull norms.
Originally posted by ATruGod
He states they couldn't retrieve Nuclear DNA on 6 attempts so they conclude its not of this world, but moms DNA is? Doesnt that make it "from this world".
I just don't see how this lack of evidence proves anything.
Originally posted by game over man
If it was a real skull it would be all over the news. The Phoenix Lights, Roswell, Stephenville, and Edgar Mitchell and occasionally Betty and Barney Hill are usually on the news/tv repeatedly. Why?
How could this guy find proof of alien life before NASA, SETI, MUFON, US AMRY, ect. ect..? To me the skull is clearly fake, unless someone has more to add...
Originally posted by poet1b
Since the DNA evidence isn't conclusive, the next thing to examine, it seems to me, is the material that the skull is made of. Why is the skull harder than a human skull? Is it made of calcium, like human bones, or something else. In the official reports sections it is stated that,
www.starchildproject.com...
calcium hydroxyapatite (the essence of all mammalian bone), its parts are configured "naturally" (not cobbled together or in any other way hoaxed), and it presents numerous physical anomalies that do not conform to standard skull norms.
Aparently it is more like tooth than bone, and has strange fibers inside the bone. If the authors of the official reports can be validated as dong the work stated with the credentials listed then clearly this is something extremely unique, and not explainable through normal biological development.
Also, I wonder why teams haven't been sent down to look for the remaining skeleton. If a young girl wondering in a cave found it, then surely teams searching through these cave would also be able to find the skeletal remains. The whole story of the discovery is very fishy.
It seems extremely unrealistic that some horny ET made it with a human female and she bored a child from the union. If the skull of the child is this different from a normal child, then it seems highly unlikely that two species so completely different could produce an offspring. Most likely such an offspring would have to be the result of genetic manipulation, but if so, you think the aliens would have kept the woman and the child in a very controlled environment so they could monitor their experiment. Maybe she escaped, hid in a cave, and died there with the child. Then again, maybe these ET's were doing some illegal experiments, the ET cops tracked them down, and they hid the woman and child to save their skins. I think the latter story sounds more believable, but still it is nothing but wild speculation.
If this child was the result of genetic manipulation, some sort of scientific experiment that was hastily abandoned, then maybe considerably more evidence of ETs could be found at the site were the skull was found. Possibly more skulls like this one are at this site.
Originally posted by Leto
Originally posted by NavalFC
reply to post by Leto
hardly know abything about genetics? Where have you been the last 30 years? you do realize we have mapped the entire human genome yes? and saying that we dont know everything int saying we know nothing. We know about speciation, well documented.
We may not know everything, but we know alot.
This is the very thing that allows species to seperate along the evolutionary ladder.
again, I state it again, you cant just "have sex with an alien" and get a hybrid especially with a being who has a diffeent nucleo peptide chaining method.
and thats besides the point all together! the premise of this video is that since they couldnt extract the fathers DNA, it must be an alien!
And that is utter and complete NON SENSE.
When you map the genome of every species on this planet,
when you bring back to life extinct species such as the mammoth and the tasmanian tiger,
and when you solve the hunger problem through genetics, and when you cure the genetic diseases, and when you improve human senses such as sight and hearing through genetics, and when you increase the human lifespan through genetics,
then you can you say we humans know a little about genetics.
Right now we know practically nothing about genetics compared to what's achieveable.
What if they found a forensics expert who does facial reconstruction from skulls? What would they determine? Would the results be the same?
Not to mention scientists have been able to get soft tissue from a T-Rex and are trying to pull DNA from it.
Originally posted by cruzion
Not to mention scientists have been able to get soft tissue from a T-Rex and are trying to pull DNA from it.
Hmm. Soft tissue from a creature extinct and buried for 65 million years? Do you have a source for this claim?
Originally posted by cruzion
Not to mention scientists have been able to get soft tissue from a T-Rex and are trying to pull DNA from it.
Hmm. Soft tissue from a creature extinct and buried for 65 million years? Do you have a source for this claim?