AboveTopSecret.com Video and Media Portal.Books, posters, and more.T-shirts, mouse pads, cups, and bags.Member podcasts.Conspiracy theory wiki.Alternative news headlinesBelowTopSecret.com - off topic and general chit chat.AboveTopSecret.com - conspiracy theories and


 

 

This topic is in the Science & Technology discussion forum.  (rss)


Private Firms Own 22% of the Human Genome


<<  1    2  >>



reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 01:15 PM by kozmo


I highly doubt that God is going to be too excited to learn that some greedy company is holding a patent over His work!

Seriously though... at what point do we finally tell these companies to go f#*k themselves? There certain things that just shouldn't be "owned" and God's roadmap to life is pretty high on that list - I would think.

[edit on 15-12-2008 by kozmo]



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 01:24 PM by ZeroKnowledge


There is something good in this thread, to me at least. I thought that percentage of DNA patented by $ is larger.
As for the idea that it is not about the money - if one has patented gene that is responsible for color of eyes any toying with this gene to make color different will need to be via this patent. It is all about the money, as the song goes. Also think about diabetes gene (if there is one, i doubt it very much) or over genes that will be target for gene therapy in not so distant future.
Now_Then - patents are protected only where they are protected. No, i am not insane or cynical. Each country (or Union) have their patent office so in order for a patent to be protected in X , X's patent office needs to be paid. Y or Z are no mans land. Not to mention hiring a lawyer to check for patent infringements and for suing. So protecting patent globally needs a LOT of money. Usually patents are applied only in main producers and consumers of product.
All info is 5 years old from a boring class. Hope it is still valid and i am not senile.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 01:31 PM by ngchunter


Originally posted by Now_Then
Hang on... I'm using my DNA right now... Am I infringing copyright?

Not unless by "using your DNA" you mean you sequenced your own DNA to find a previously-patented gene sequence coding for a defect that you then create a test for to sell to people so they can find out if they have the same defect... then you'd be in violation.



   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 15-12-2008 @ 02:31 PM by Now_Then


reply to post by ngchunter



Phew that's some relief... No I'm just doing the normal reproduction of cells in a normal everyday living way - someone let me know when someone slaps a patent on cell division (or whatever it is I use my DNA for)... I also planing to have kids one day - that will be a new thing for me to do with my DNA.



   copyright & usage 
AboveTopSecret.com is advertising supported.


<<  1    2  >>












































ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.021 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.