I am going to have to agree to this 100%. As for who should "take the reigns", I too do not know.
Either way, great thread.
For Rep. Paul, each piece of legislation must be examined for its constitutionality; that is, on the basis of whether or not the US Constitution allows the Congress or the Federal Government to engage in the actions described by the proposed legislation. If the Constitution does not allow it, then it must be opposed.
Paul authors more bills than the average representative, such as those that impose term limits, or abolish the income tax[85] or the Federal Reserve; many do not escape committee review.
The fact that marketing is most of what effects an election lends some credence to your idea. Ron Pauls age and looks arent really the problem. The problem is that the citizens of this country let the talking heads and multi million dollar media campaigns run the show. They go for fashionable or pretty.
Mainstream media loves him now that the election is over, and the economy is behaving much the way he said it would.
He's a key person in gaining an understanding of what the the two major political parties have done, and are continuing to do to the American population via bad money policies, and creeping socialistic control.
Originally posted by jam321
reply to post by spacedoubt
Mainstream media loves him now that the election is over, and the economy is behaving much the way he said it would.
Do they love him or are they using him cause he has a big following?
[edit on 5-12-2008 by jam321]