Any discussion will do. I just want to see if someone can become aware of the real motives behind such efforts.
The first question I would like to ask in reply, is whether you have ever tried being a member at David Wilcock's forum. You will notice it is rather
heavily moderated. This makes the intellectual climate a bit... less than it could be.
People that are really trying to say something of significance will not have the patience to remain there for long, that much is obvious. The last
post I bothered to try to make there was supposedly "too long".
I have a lot of familiarity with the Ra material. That material is just like any other material that comes up - a mixture of information and
Hidden_Hand's posts, and the 2005 posts, are also clever mixtures of information and disinformation. He is leaving out information that should
logically precede how he would be able to arrive at the conclusion of such future predictions, on purpose. I can tell you a little bit about the
science of future prediction, if you like. Here's a good article to start you off:
Oh, I don't disagree philosophically with HH, his philosophy applies to this reality most certaintly. But his information is specifically designed to
perpetuate this paradigm for reality, even though he is talking about "next density" etc. I can tell you right now that the only "next" that is
possible is one of thorough understanding of non-duality. The teaching of the principles of non-duality is surprisingly rare.
Regarding 4), we have to avoid the temptation of jumping to conclusions too quickly. The best thing to do in such cases is to look at the information
all on its own and weigh it against a standard (I choose to weigh it against the standard of non-duality). Only then can we begin to draw conclusions
of intention, though I have my speculations.
Here is another important website for considering the concept of non-duality:
It is quite a long read I warn you. I recommend skipping ahead to where the QnA begins. Only with such information can we begin to see the sheer
extent of the illusory drama being woven all around us. That does not prevent us from escaping it, however, though we must wait for the right time.
Yes, I am only talking about the first part of Z.Addendum. Again, we have an example of purposeful mixing of info and disinfo. Funny, how the examples
just turn up all around us when we start looking for (usually intentional) mixtures of info. and disinfo. isn't it? And the 2005 posts even made that
one clear, to boot.
Shock testing is best exemplified at the psychological level. Any individual or group can be singled out, shock tested, and monitored for reaction.
Then statistics can be drawn up, and predictions made based upon those statistics.
Smaller shock test examples include gasoline prices, and the like. There is usually no real reason behind the price changes.
As for questions from LordBucket:
There is indeed *some* truth in H_H's posts and the ones in 2005. The establishment would like to perpetuate the illusion by mixing info. with
disinfo., as has worked for 1000s of years now. They just have to keep it up a few years longer and the new order would be in place.
The service I am trying to provide is to show a way of seeing past these illusions so that info. can be discerned from disinfo. Pure info. without
disinfo. inevitably leads to non-duality. Non-duality leads to an understanding that the purposes of the Western and Eastern schools of thought must
Spiritual aspirations require a strong Scientific foundation and an Artistic medium to connect them.
I realize saying that on its own leaves a lot to the imagination, but I will try my best to elaborate over time. We are working to have the 2010 shock
be just as poor as it shows on the Timewave Zero graph...
[edit on 6-12-2008 by other-worldly]