The world's most heinous crime, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 21 times


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 09:16 AM by pause4thought
reply to post by blueorder



Im more of an isolationist, leave these hell holes to their own devices unless it looks like they could interfere with our nation (primarily militarily)

Much of what you have said makes sense, sadly. Problem is, when a nation/nations regard oil deposits across the globe as intrinsically essential to their own growth/survival, loss of control/influence over such regions is equated with interference on the "home" front, so to speak.

After all, some nations have more right to control the oil than others.

(I think they call it 'democracy'.)


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 10:09 AM by pause4thought
reply to post by Grumble



In reality while Western troops are out trying to 'win' wars across the globe their governments have lost the plot at home.

It just so happens I've just posted this summary on the end of US domination and the rise of China on another thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I am aware what I said is stark, and arguably a worse-case scenario. But the evidence is mounting that no amount of oil-stealing will save the US economy - or reverse its consequent global political demise.

I take no pleasure in such predictions. It's simply a case of accepting the logical result of a total economic/financial meltdown in the US, which looks increasingly likely by the day.




[edit on 4/12/08 by pause4thought]


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 10:23 AM by blueorder
Originally posted by pause4thought

In reality while Western troops are out trying to 'win' wars across the globe their governments have lost the plot at home.

It just so happens I've just posted this summary on the end of US domination and the rise of China on another thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I am aware what I said is stark, and arguably a worse-case scenario. But the evidence is mounting that no amount of oil-stealing will save the US economy - or reverse its consequent global political demise.

I take no pleasure in such predictions. It's simply a case of accepting the logical result of a total economic/financial meltdown in the US, which looks increasingly likely by the day.




[edit on 4/12/08 by pause4thought]


I agree that the US (and indeed we in the UK) may be in decline- my reasoning would be more along cultural lines, we must be the only civilisation in history that voluntarily committed suicide in terms of its population, history and culture......


Re the oil, one thing is for sure, we don't "steal" it though, we pay for it, and dragged up backwaters like Saudi Arabia through our purchase


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 10:51 AM by pause4thought
reply to post by blueorder



I agree that the US (and indeed we in the UK) may be in decline- my reasoning would be more along cultural lines, we must be the only civilisation in history that voluntarily committed suicide in terms of its population, history and culture......

I believe you are right to tie all those threads together. We may well be entering a monumental period in history.

Re the oil, one thing is for sure, we don't "steal" it though, we pay for it, and dragged up backwaters like Saudi Arabia through our purchase

I should have been clearer. I had in mind the way oil contracts were handed out to select Western companies post-Iraq. The machinations were so blatant that I suspect the PTB were counting on the knowledge the masses wouldn't protest the injustice.

Perhaps it would be more accurate to say Iraq has been defrauded of control over its oil reserves.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 11:49 AM by budski
reply to post by pause4thought



At this stage, I'd like to go back to Iran in 1953 - the coup was staged in order to control the oil, this control being placed in the hands of western oil companies, after the leader mossadegh was overthrown by a CIA backed coup.

Some would say that this man was a remarkable leader who did nothing but good for his people - and then western powers overthrew him so that they could control the oil, because he had nationalised his own countries resources.

More info here

The coup and other info

So we can see history repeating itself - or if you prefer, western government using the same tricks they always have.

I do not accept the idea that it's ok for us to steal another countries resources just because we are better armed.

Nor do I buy into all the "freedom" crap spouted by BUsh and his ilk.

If the west truly represented freedom and an end to tyranny, it would NOT be happening in so many places, including our own countries.



reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 02:01 PM by budski
reply to post by Grumble



The only dirty work the US and other nations are doing, are the ones that benefit themselves.

All this prtecting democracy and freedom stuff is a red herring designed to invoke patriotism so that people don'tlook too closely at what's really happening.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 02:06 PM by Kailassa
Originally posted by pause4thought

Hi Kailassa. Despite the fact your avatar makes me feel distinctly giddy you raise some pertinent (and highly disturbing) issues. Do you have any links that provide evidence / discuss the points you raised?


Sorry about the avatar. I had a better one but a change in picture policy meant I couldn't use it.

I collected what I can find in the time available about America aiding Saddam in his misdeeds.
Here are two commentaries summing up the situation:

Gassing Our Own People

How the US armed Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons

On August 18, the New York Times carried a front-page story headlined, “Officers say U.S. aided Iraq despite the use of gas”. Quoting anonymous US “senior military officers”, the NYT “revealed” that in the 1980s, the administration of US President Ronald Reagan covertly provided “critical battle planning assistance at a time when American intelligence knew that Iraqi commanders would employ chemical weapons in waging the decisive battles of the Iran-Iraq war”. The story made a brief splash in the international media, then died.

While the August 18 NYT article added new details about the extent of US military collaboration with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during Iraq's 1980-88 war with Iran, it omitted the most outrageous aspect of the scandal: not only did Washington turn a blind-eye to the Hussein regime's repeated use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers and Iraq's Kurdish minority, but the US helped Iraq develop its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs.

Nor did the NYT dwell on the extreme cynicism and hypocrisy of the current US administration's citing of those same terrible atrocities — which were disregarded at the time by Washington — and those same weapons programs — which no longer exist, having been dismantled and destroyed in the decade following the 1991 Gulf War — to justify a massive new war against the people of Iraq.


Here is a list of more general articles going deeper into the background on a site I find informative:

informationclearinghouse.info

And a copy an important article from the LA Times, referenced by the above articles.
Unfortunately I can't locate the original online:

BUSH SECRET EFFORT HELPED IRAQ BUILD ITS WAR MACHINE;

But classified records show that Bush's efforts on Hussein's behalf continued well beyond the end of the Iran-Iraq War and persisted in the face of increasingly widespread warnings from inside the American government that the overall policy had become misdirected.

Moreover, it appears that instead of merely keeping Hussein afloat as a counterweight to Iran, the U.S. aid program helped him become a dangerous military power in his own right, able to threaten the very U.S. interests that the program originally was designed to protect.

Clearly, U.S. aid did not lead Hussein to become a force for peace in the volatile region. In the spring of 1990, as senior Administration officials worked to give him more financial aid, the Iraqi leader bragged that Iraq possessed chemical weapons and threatened to "burn half of Israel." Nor did he change his savagely repressive methods. In the summer of 1988, for example, he shocked the world by killing several thousand Kurds with poison gas.

Even today, the Iraqi nuclear and chemical weapons programs carried forward with the help of sophisticated American technology continue to haunt U.S. and United Nations officials as they struggle to root out elements of those programs that have survived the allied victory in the Persian Gulf War.
.....

While the American rationale was that Hussein was a buffer against Iran, classified records show U.S. support for his regime continued unabated after the official cease-fire in the Iran-Iraq War was signed in August, 1988, and after Iraq's chemical weapons attack on the Kurdish villages on July 19, 1988.


That's a lot of reading, but I'm guessing you won't mind that.


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 02:33 PM by budski
reply to post by Moonsouljah



As far as DRC goes, I'm pretty sure the Belgians (amongst others) messed them up pretty bad in colonial days - then pulled out and left them to pick up the pieces.



reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 05:57 PM by budski
reply to post by sos37



GWB simply preserved the existing status quo - he "only" did what many before him had done.
The major difference is that he and his friends did it to get rich themselves as well. (see halliburton/cheney/KBR)


reply posted on 4-12-2008 @ 06:12 PM by skeptic_al
reply to post by budski



The world's most heinous crime

Oooo, Ooooo I know this one

It's when a country decides to Bomb an entire country in order to
get one person.

It's when a country decides to invade another country based upon
News Services that based their News on Manufactured Information
intentionally leaked from the White House.

It's when one country accuses another country of heinous crimes and
that country then does the same heinous crimes in yet another country
to avoid their own laws on heinous crimes.

Is when somebody makes a law forbidding him to be prosecuted for
any War Crimes he may have commited in the past.
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian scientists reach buried Antarctic Lake Vostok
  Posted 5 days ago with 83 member flags
Monsanto quits as GM results announced (EUROPE)
  Posted 6 days ago with 72 member flags
Strange noises reported around North Battleford
  Posted 17 days ago with 67 member flags
Ayatollah: Kill all Jews, annihilate Israel
  Posted 5 days ago with 49 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 15 hours ago, 112 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 11 hours ago, 96 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 63 replies
Anonymous show your face!
  Rant, Posted 6 hours ago, 58 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 13 hours ago, 50 replies