reply to post by NavalFC
And you realise that attacking people in replies is not only frowned upon around this forum, but is out ans out against forum policy?
Just one word matey: Manners.
Basically saying that posters post nonsense and bollocks (we know what you are saying, even if it is spelt such to get away from auto-correction) is
rude, disrespectfull, and counterproductive to ATS members, who actually posess an open mind.
While you've got me at it, how exactly have you come by your 'beyond any reasonable doubt', fully conclusive evidence that 'moon landings' (as
purported to have taken place) actually happened as described? I'd be very interested in learning of it. If it's 'evidence' in the form of "
Because i saw it on TV, in a book, in photo's etc." Then you may as well forget any credibility you arrived with.
FYI. A hell of a lot of people (from what i've read here and elsewhere) DO think the official RECORD of the 'moon landings' were faked, rather than
a black and white " We have never gone to the moon". It's a hugely complex subject that is not as simple as you appear to imagine.
There are a couple of main scenarios:
1.) We DID, in fact travel to the moon, but the official RECORD (video, photo, transcripts, press pack, tape etc) WERE faked.
Again, opinion varies as to the reason(s) for this to be so.
Popular hypothesis include:
The film in the cameras were mostly spoiled due to harsh environmental conditions, or badly framed/focusing led to some creative artwork in a
studio/filmset back on earth, after the mission(s).
The luar surface is riddled with ancient technological artifacts, and structures left behind by an alien race/ancient humans, who had an outpost
situated on the moon. The RECORD was then faked/altered/edited to cover this knowledge up.
This is the hypothesis i subscribe to. There is a HUGE amount of EVIDENCE to prove this fact despite NASA's efforts to hide this. IF you are
genuinely interested, you can navigate to any OFFICIAL NASA Apollo photo archive and see the blatently obvious tampering and airbrushing and other
editing techniques, that are trying to cover these technological remnants.
As above, but the artifacts are from a HUMAN civilisation that existed in antiquity, and attained a very high degree of technological capability, but
was subsequently 'regressed' (perhaps over and over) to a pre-technological state, following an extinction level event of some kind (war, virus,
asteroid, pole shift, nibiru etc) We are their descendants.
There are more of course, but these are the main hypothesis floating about.
In conclusion, while you may not agree with the viewpoint of a poster, perhaps you could refrain from insulting them twice. Once by reducing
someone's view and substantial reasearch time investment as nonsense and bullocks, and twice by saying what you said, without offering ANY
information help uphold your point.
It's a bit like a TV programme, if you don't like what you see, don't look. If you don't like what you read, read something else!
Simple really isn't it?
If you need to be pointed to a specific photo or set of for 'proof', then there are hundreds of people here that can point you in the right
direction.
Spikey.
If everyone had all the answers and incontrovertible evidence, then why have an alternative
discussion site like ATS at all? 
In any case no one can be 100% sure of anything, except of course, death and taxes!! 
