I didn't change anything in the photo as far as size of highlight only brightness and contrast as well as gamma, I was having a hard time seeing the image(not size) thanks for the hi res image but I still don't see the same size.

Originally posted by alyosha1981
I see a clear diference in the size of the footprints even in the hi res image you provided the lower one looks more"deeply" embeded while the smaller one isn't as deep.

The angle between the pattern and the direction of the sun is not the same, the shadow is actually longer on the "small" footprint on the right. There is a third footprint between the two, with the horizontal tread pattern casting no shadows at all because it is parallel to the direction of sunlight). All three footprints have nearly the same depth.

Ok I see the print in the middle, however my question is why does the "heel cup" of the print in question not seem to be of consistant size with the lower print, in a boot you should have the same size soles unless you have two different sized feet! The hel portion of the print in question is clear enough to guess(imo) that the entire heel made contact ans not partial contact as has been mentioned. The outline of the heel portion can clearly be seen in your hi res pic. I think those boots did not have narrow heels like tennis shoes rather a more uniform wider build( I'll look into this tomorow its late)

This picture says it all for me:




K, as I always say, you may not know the who, what, where, when, why, the fact that there is a discrepancy in an official photo should set off bells for everyone.

The astronaut suits of those missions were all identical. So how in something so publicized and something that alot of people claim really happen, is there two different suits being worn on the moon.

Now personally I don't really believe in the apollo moon landings, but the picture above makes the whole secret program seem much more probable. Because on a set of a movie that was soooo important at the time, there would be no way they would just happen to have two different wardrobe suits. Come on!!! They would be on the ball with that, its the most obvious thing. Maybe there really is a secret program, we'll likely never know.

Originally posted by alyosha1981
I think those boots did not have narrow heels like tennis shoes rather a more uniform wider build( I'll look into this tomorow its late)

Yes I see what you mean. The narrower print on the right is caused by its different orientation. Perspective narrows vertical distance by 30% at 45°. Maybe the terrain is not perfectly level too, so it could add some bias to the perspective (red arrows). The left print is also closer, further changing the angle.



[edit on 2008-12-4 by nablator]

Originally posted by king9072
This picture says it all for me:

K, as I always say, you may not know the who, what, where, when, why, the fact that there is a discrepancy in an official photo should set off bells for everyone.

The astronaut suits of those missions were all identical. So how in something so publicized and something that alot of people claim really happen, is there two different suits being worn on the moon.

Now personally I don't really believe in the apollo moon landings, but the picture above makes the whole secret program seem much more probable. Because on a set of a movie that was soooo important at the time, there would be no way they would just happen to have two different wardrobe suits. Come on!!! They would be on the ball with that, its the most obvious thing. Maybe there really is a secret program, we'll likely never know.

They arent two different suits!!!! On the left the astronaut is clearly hunched forward caausing the part on his back to be raised up and conceal the forward part of his head, where in the right hes standing straight and their is no obstruction!

So the Moon People wear boots with identical tread patterns to the Apollo astronauts? Wow, talk about coincidence!

I understand the desire for an alien moon base, and evidence to prove it.

But alas I fear that no matter how hard you strain on this that foot print will remain a footprint belonging to a human astronaut.
Rocks will be nothing more than rocks, and space suites will simply be altered by light fluctuations and shadow fall.


If I had the power to wish things into existance, I'd wish me up a couple billion of whatever the best currency will be in 10 years.

In the mean time keep wishing.

Shouldn't the tread pattern be smaller if it were a smaller boot?

Originally posted by Monger
So the Moon People wear boots with identical tread patterns to the Apollo astronauts? Wow, talk about coincidence!

No! They don't! Check it out here:


Source: LunarArcheology

And notice the ridge in the bottom right pic? Now that's NOT the astronaut boot design. But could this be two prints overlapping? But then this is a five ridge pattern!

So all this discussion of a twisting boot in the dust, many boot marks, overlapping footprints, dust blown over, lighter left foot, gravitational effect on the left side etc, etc, doesn't hold much water!

And what's more, there seem to be not two, but three types of footprints! Wow! No equipment standardization at NASA, what?

Cheers!

One thought I had was that people who have seen "greys" which are small maybe 4-5 feet tall usually never mention their feet. Boots I suppose but I would guess they would be proportional in size but haven't really heard any "witness" ever mention that.

thats the same guy with his visor up look on the 1st page of this forum you will find that its the same guy with his visor up